{"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=154&parliament=2&state=rejected","first":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?state=rejected","last":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=562&state=rejected","next":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=155&state=rejected","prev":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=153&state=rejected"},"data":[{"type":"archived-petition","id":54741,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54741.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Bring back 'Junior Choice' to Radio 2","background":null,"additional_details":"To call on the Government to ask the BBC to stop wasting money on staff pay-offs overs over and above its contractual obligations and consider bringing back the Radio 2 weekend morning show 'Junior Choice' and for the DCMS to consider making it a requirement of the renewal of the BBC's charter.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-09-10T10:40:34.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:22.941Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:42:23.512Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-09-10T10:40:34.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":6144,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/6144.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Repeal the Human Rights Act.","background":null,"additional_details":"The Government should simply repeal the Human Rights Act without regard for any European Union or other objections. This would automatically give the Government back it's right to decide such matters.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-08-06T20:52:04.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:26:40.198Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:33:25.900Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-08-06T20:52:04.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26046,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26046.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Court order for non resident parent","background":null,"additional_details":"When a married couple seperate and divorce the resident parent usually has the last say in whether or not the absent parent can see his/her children.\r\n\r\nEven though both parents should have equal responsibility, if the resident parent says no then it is up to the absent parent to apply to the courts to re-gain access to the children.\r\n\r\nThe law should be changed whereby the resident parent has to apply to the court first, give a reasonable explanation to the court as to why they dont want the absent parent to see the children before any forms of contact is stopped, then it would be up to the absent parent to apply to the court to re-gain contact.\r\n\r\nThere are too many instances of the resident parent using the children as weapons and creating an imbalance of parenting by taking it upon themselves to stop the absent parent having contact with the children just because they say so.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-19T09:22:54.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:44.878Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:09.482Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-19T09:22:54.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26062,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26062.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Do not increase benefits when public sector are taking pay freeze","background":null,"additional_details":"Reduce the amount paid to people on benefits.  Why should they be allowed a 5% increase in 2012 when the people who actually work in the public sector are having their pay frozen for a number of years.\r\n\r\nPeople on benefits should be given the minimum - not be better off for not going to work!\r\n\r\nAlso, the benefits should be paid in vouchers - not cash!  They should be told what and where they can spend the benefits on so it stops them buying luxury items (i.e. alcohol, cigarettes etc)","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-19T13:38:20.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:44.924Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:09.658Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-19T13:38:20.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":1454,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/1454.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Scrap the Digital Economy Act 2010 (DEA)","background":null,"additional_details":"The \"content industry\" has lied to governments and consumers over the impact on the economy due to filesharing for no cash, no profit and no personal gain.\r\n\r\nThe DEA is an ill-founded item of law based on such deception by those who perceive wrongly that they've most to lose.\r\n\r\nThe DEA must be repealed, and all Copyright legislation be brought up-to-date to reflect the changes in technology that opens the free sharing of knowledge and works to all of humanity.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-08-04T10:19:59.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:26:25.349Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:32:34.768Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-08-04T10:19:59.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26047,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26047.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"RACIAL groups cannot be required not to wear turbans, burkas, etc even if against the nature of their work/activities, but can for RELGIOUS groups?","background":null,"additional_details":"HMG should decide which have priority or the same; racial groups practising their customs or people's religious observances? Court could legally a race by factors like genetic make-up, physical appearance, language, geographical area, religion, etc. Sikhs/Jews an ethnic race, cult or religion? In Mandla v Dowell Lee (1983) the House of Lords found that Sikhs constituted a RACIAL group when a Sikh boy was refused a place at a school because he wore a turban. This judgement was based on Sikhs long shared history & conscious distinguishing it from other groups in terms of customs, geographical origin, common language, being recognised as a separate group in the surrounding community. Jews regard fellow Jews if they are born of Jewish mother. A person can be a Jew even if not practising Judaism. Likewise can a person converted to Sikhism by believing in karma & reincarnation unless BORN a Sikh? Belief in reincarnation does not require a believer to start wearing turbans, bangles, etc.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-19T09:32:39.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:44.882Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:09.503Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-19T09:32:39.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26061,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26061.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Any HMG (present & future) should not espouse for rights/aid/immigration be conferred to other states, unless UK is conferring in her best interests","background":null,"additional_details":"Benefits conferred to other states should always have a get-out cause and review date to ensure that any rights conferred to others are not for perpetuity. It is No Brainer that rights conferred to another state (like EU), if not renewed/negotiated from time to time by a sovereign state may be taken for granted to be permanent by stealthy ‘prescription’ (a Land Law concept). All EU agreements should not be assumed permanent & renewed/renegotiated every (say) decade. Grants of rights under EU treaties give the impression that they are for perpetuity. Under Land Law, the right of private way (easements) over another's land may arise from prescription by twenty years of use of a land by implied easement. What rights is given away by a sovereign state may be returned back to the state, unless it is by military conquest as in 1066 by William the Conquer.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-19T13:29:18.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:44.920Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:09.640Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-19T13:29:18.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":73370,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/73370.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop Youtube showing lock picking","background":null,"additional_details":"Youtube are showing how to pick locks, this should be removed immediately as it is helping burglars and other scum to get into places they should not.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2014-12-31T13:09:59.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:27.636Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:45:50.443Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-12-31T13:09:59.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":6221,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/6221.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Champion Human Rights, the authority of the European Court of Justice, and all international courts.","background":null,"additional_details":"Human rights legislation is an expression of our collective responsibility to each other, purely by virtue of us all being human. An attack on the inalienable rights of one person undermines the rights of every man, woman & child.\r\n\r\nThere is no need to fear the concept of supreme individual rights, on the contrary it empowers and makes the law comprehensible and accessible to every citizen. The innocent & victims of crime enjoy the same rights as criminals - it is the marrow of a true justice system to proportionally moderate the rights of wrong doers in order to protect the rights of the majority.\r\n\r\nI call upon parliament to publicly recognise that it, and our courts, have no sovereignty over human dignity and the rights it bestowed on the victims of the Holocaust & Gulags or the citizens of Libya and Syria today.\r\n\r\nIt is your duty, as the government of a civilised nation, to advance human rights everywhere by submitting to their supreme authority, as an example to the world.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-08-07T00:14:08.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:26:40.458Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:33:26.806Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-08-07T00:14:08.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26084,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26084.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Concorde fly-by for the 2012 Olympics","background":null,"additional_details":"We have spent around £10bn staging the 2012 Olympics, showcasing Great Britain to the word.\r\n\r\nWhat could be a more outstanding example of both our technological ingenuity and our ability to work with others than the fabulous aircraft, Concorde.\r\n\r\nTo have such an asset languishing in mothballs seems criminal when specialists believe they can have her flying in 6-7 weeks given the will and resources. Their efforts have been been frustrated, stymied and denied by a recalcitrant BA.\r\n\r\nIt is time the government put pressure on BA to at least allow others to Get Her Flying even if they don't have the patriotism to execute this task for themselves, for us, for the country.\r\n\r\nSee here:- http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2011/12/undercover-engineers-the-resurrection-of-concorde/\r\n\r\nThe will is there, apparently others such as Richard Branson have expressed interest in bringing Concorde back but have been rebuffed. Who knows what might happen if BA see's what interest she stirs up.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-19T22:45:40.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:44.986Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:09.855Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-19T22:45:40.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26089,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26089.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"RACIAL groups allowed to wear turbans, burkas, etc even if against the nature of their work/activities, but RELGIOUS groups can be forced not to do so","background":null,"additional_details":"HMG should decide which have priority or the same; racial groups practising their customs or people's religious observances? Court could legally define a race by factors like genetic make-up, physical appearance, language, geographical area, religion, etc. Sikhs/Jews an ethnic race, cult or religion? In Mandla v Dowell Lee (1983) House of Lords found that Sikhs constituted a RACIAL group when a Sikh boy was refused a place at a school because he wore a turban. This judgement was based on Sikhs long shared history & collective consciousness distinguishing them from other groups in customs, geographical origin, language, being recognised as a separate group in the surrounding community. Jews regard a Jew as born of Jewish mother. A person can be a Jew even if not practising Judaism. Likewise can a person be converted to Sikhism by believing in karma & reincarnation unless BORN a Sikh? Belief in reincarnation does not require a believer to start wearing turbans, bangles, etc.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-20T09:05:29.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:44.994Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:09.894Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-20T09:05:29.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26099,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26099.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Limit the pay increases of Britain's bosses","background":null,"additional_details":"The increases to top executives pay levels should be proportionate to increases for staff. There should be a limit (represented as a %) that board salaries should not exceed. So for example, if shareholders want to reward their CEO with a 50% increase, then the pay of general staff needs to increase proportionately. ","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-20T11:52:41.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:45.085Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:10.010Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-20T11:52:41.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26108,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26108.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"David Cameron must investigate the legality of the European Communites Act 1972","background":null,"additional_details":"I request that David Cameron bring before Parliament a private members bill to investigate the lawful status of The European Communities Act 1972, . It was  signed by Mr Edward Heath MP as Prime Minister, he did so without the prior approval of the British people by means of a General election or Referendum in contravention of the British Constitution .Even though Harold Wilson tried to validate the signing of the European Communities Act by means of a post dated referendum, this cannot have any basis in law in view of the \"Wednesbury Reasonable protocol \"  where  Baron Diplock, KC, an English judge and Law Lord, stated that a decision that is \"So outrageous in its defiance of logic or accepted moral standards that no sensible person who had applied his mind to the question to be decided could have arrived at it.\"\r\n\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-20T15:34:48.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:45.183Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:10.212Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-20T15:34:48.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":6239,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/6239.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Imagine if Kurdistan was your country and you were a Kurd what would have had in your mind now?","background":null,"additional_details":"Imagine if Kurdistan was your country and you were a Kurd what would have had in your mind now? Kurdistan literary means the “land of Kurds\", the land of a few civilisations locates between the two rivers of Tigers and Euphrates and is known as Mesopotamia. Despite, Kurds are regarded as the fourth largest people in the region and remained stateless. Kurdistan was largely a territory of the Ottoman Empire. Subsequent to the collapse of the latter following WWI; the allied members proposed in the peace treaty of Sèvres (1920) to recognise former Ottoman territories as independent countries whilst Kurdistan was amongst one of them. But in the treaty of Lausanne (1923) that replaced the former treaty, Kurdistan was ignored and divided amongst the four newly independent countries in the region. The lion share went under Turkey; the 2nd part remained under Persia; the 3rd part attached to Iraq. Lastly, the 4th part appended to Syria. Please sign this petition for the Kurds.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-08-07T02:34:43.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:26:40.505Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:33:26.972Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-08-07T02:34:43.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":38210,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/38210.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"ALL fuel and energy supplies ie.petrol,diesel,gas,elecric ,nation alised ,no private share holders.","background":null,"additional_details":"All fuel and energy supplies, ie. petrol, diesel,gas, elecricity,nationlised to ensure full control of all prices wholsale and retail are cotrolled at one source to ensure everyone is in the same boat.Then the Government can ensure we are all working together.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-09-05T15:06:41.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:23.927Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:39:19.155Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-09-05T15:06:41.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":46591,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/46591.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Withdraw From the EU","background":null,"additional_details":"Withdraw from the EU and spend the £50 Million pounds per day that is wasted on europe on getting people back to work, to cut the welfare bill.\r\nAt the same time close our boders to new imigrants until unemployment falls below 1 million saving British jobs for British people.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-03-01T17:25:04.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:55.055Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:40:49.973Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-03-01T17:25:04.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":31596,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/31596.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"To reject any proposal by government to privatise U.K. roads (new or old)","background":null,"additional_details":"Kill David Cameron's proposal stone dead to privatise new road building in the U.K.  What does he think we motorsists pay Road Fund Tax, fuel duty and Local counsil highways tax for in the first place?","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-03-19T15:04:10.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:02.618Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:38:07.587Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-03-19T15:04:10.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26140,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26140.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Vote against double summertime","background":null,"additional_details":"There is a proposal in Parliament to put the clocks forward two hours in the spring but only put them back one hour in the Autumn. This will mean during the depths of winter sunrise will be as late as 10.00am. All children will then go to school in the dark. We are told that there is no greater risk of accidents BUT be wary that if this proves not to be the case then maybe schools will revise their start times to avoid the darkness to keep children safer. If this happens working parents will be very much affected. Additionally this means that in the summer sunset will be as late as 10.30pm maybe good for some businesses but studies have shown it has a negative impact on health in general.\r\n\r\nIf you feel that getting up in the dark up to 10.00 o'clock in the morning and making children go to school in the dark is unnacceptable then please sign this petition so we can show the government the people do not want the change.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-20T23:59:08.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:45.279Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:10.533Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-20T23:59:08.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":38224,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/38224.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"my home is my castle","background":null,"additional_details":"in defending my home I should be able to use whatever force I deem necessary.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-09-05T18:15:28.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:23.977Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:39:19.283Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-09-05T18:15:28.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":1458,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/1458.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Include car insurance within the price of road fund license","background":null,"additional_details":"At the present moment, failure to purchase car insurance is punishable by the law under the Road Traffic Act 1968 & your vehicle is ALWAYS seized. Currently Motor Insurance can only be purchased from private companies and is thus extremely expensive. The compulsory nature of the legal position distorts market forces and prevents consumer choice. Essentially, the law forces road users, under law, to purchase products from private companies. For example, the cost of 1 year's insurance for a 17 year old male is now in excess of £4,500.\r\nThis petition requests that a not-for-profit 'basic' insurance which satisfies the law be included in the purchase price of the Road Fund License. Should users wish to improve their level of cover then private insurers will be allowed to continue to offer this.\r\nThis change will eliminate uninsured drivers, increase treasury revenues and prevent the police from enforcing extortion.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-08-04T10:20:15.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:26:25.364Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:32:34.836Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-08-04T10:20:15.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26144,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26144.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Using water hose to break up & control riots is more acceptable than firing plastic (or even live) bullets at protesters as in dictatorial regimes","background":null,"additional_details":"Utlising water hose to break-up a riot is more acceptable (& less life threatening) than firing plastic (or even live) bullets. A small group of armed police force tend form a clique & support each other. Accidents can happen when a group of armed police are trained in effect shoot first, ask questions later. There are incidences whereby a police officer shot a suspect dead a suspect carrying a table leg without warning because they thought he was carrying a shotgun, shot dead Menezes in a crowed tube as they thought he was a suicide bomber, an OAP, a barrister, a driver whilst attempting to stop him on a routine check. What about the police shooting dead a suspect in Ipswich about over 2 years ago? Where are the outcomes of the investigations by Police Complaints Authority? Suspects should not be shot dead without warning. Challenging armed suspects to surrender should be done in a more secluded place, away from crowded places.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-21T07:30:37.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:45.295Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:10.590Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-21T07:30:37.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":6240,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/6240.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Imagine if Kurdistan was your country and you were a Kurd what would have had in your mind now?","background":null,"additional_details":"Imagine if Kurdistan was your country and you were a Kurd what would have had in your mind now? Kurdistan literary means the “land of Kurds\", the land of a few civilisations locates between the two rivers of Tigers and Euphrates and is known as Mesopotamia. Despite, Kurds are regarded as the fourth largest people in the region and remained stateless. Kurdistan was largely a territory of the Ottoman Empire. Subsequent to the collapse of the latter following WWI; the allied members proposed in the peace treaty of Sèvres (1920) to recognise former Ottoman territories as independent countries whilst Kurdistan was amongst one of them. But in the treaty of Lausanne (1923) that replaced the former treaty, Kurdistan was ignored and divided amongst the four newly independent countries in the region. The lion share went under Turkey; the 2nd part remained under Persia; the 3rd part attached to Iraq. Lastly, the 4th part appended to Syria. Please sign this petition for the Kurds.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-08-07T02:37:49.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:26:40.509Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:33:26.994Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-08-07T02:37:49.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26185,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26185.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Revoke/Reduce Luis Suarez 8 match ban","background":null,"additional_details":"Peition to have Luis Suarez's 8 match ban revoked/reduced.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-21T18:48:14.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:45.413Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:10.956Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-21T18:48:14.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":38413,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/38413.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Save Ark Royal","background":null,"additional_details":"Ark Royal should be retain for the nation as part of its maritime heritage.\r\n\r\nBritain developed much of the technology behind aircraft carriers, and this needs to be celebrated.\r\n\r\nArk Royal would make a worthy companion to HMS Belfast in London.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-09-10T07:13:56.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:24.541Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:39:20.957Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-09-10T07:13:56.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26148,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26148.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"stop paying mp,s second home alowences and other expences the public are having reductions in local services lets start from the top","background":null,"additional_details":"i want the government to set a exsample they are bring in new ways they the public reciave housing benfit ,ie reducing it by 15% if they have one bedroom unoccupied 25% for two in social housing ,i was made redundant in may and got a part time job so i did not have to go on benfits i recaive housing benefits because i earn a low wage but if this is being brought into law i will be worse off just becuse i have a empty room and i am not prepard to move to a smaller property this is outrageous .yes there are not a lot of social housing but this is the governments fault not ordinary working mans.\r\nso i think that all government officails ie mp,s local officiels should have there expences reduced or even stopped .single out the poorest of society this just does not work out i go to work pay my travel i even pay towards my rent and the government proposes this scandelous reform time to change and stop mp,s second home and reant allowences and travel.\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-21T09:04:29.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:45.312Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:10.634Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-21T09:04:29.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26241,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26241.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Tube strike - Allow the public to hold a counter ballot to deny a tube strike","background":null,"additional_details":"The customers of the london underground are the ultimate sufferers of the tube strikes. We need a mechanism to look after their interests. If more people vote against the strike then for the strikes then there should be a ban on the strike. If the public agrees with the reasons for the strike they may support that. However the public deserves a say when the strike is viewed as being not fair","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-22T15:46:15.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:45.591Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:11.631Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-22T15:46:15.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":"This is a matter for the Mayor and the Greater London Authority."},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26184,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26184.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Say NO to Marriage Promotion","background":null,"additional_details":"It has been made clear the Free Schools and Academies will be expected, by the government, to ensure that children  \"protected from inappropriate teaching materials and learn the nature of marriage and its importance for family life and for bringing up children\". This represents a biased message that will be given to children and by representing marriage as an ideal, will create the impression that LGBT relationships are abnormal. We the undersigned wish for this requirement to be dropped.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-21T18:10:25.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:45.408Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:10.937Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-21T18:10:25.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":46593,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/46593.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Ban 3D printers for personal use","background":null,"additional_details":"I saw an online news article recently where a man in the United States made a fully functioning automatic machine gun with a 3D printer.\r\n\r\nIf that's the case, then 3D printers should be illegal for personal use because it could allow people (especially children) to make dangerous weapons. (Knives, etc.)","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-03-01T18:31:28.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:55.075Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:40:50.004Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-03-01T18:31:28.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54753,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54753.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Save the Caversham Branch of Nationwide","background":null,"additional_details":"Nationwide Building Society are closing our local branch in Caversham, Reading - despite keeping two branches open in neighbouring streets in the town centre.\r\n\r\nThis decision, will make it difficult for many Caversham Residents - including Children, The Vulnerable & The Elderly, to continue to bank with Nationwide as the residents wish to continue banking locally.  Although cheques are being less commonly used, there are still many people who rely on this service, and to remove a local facility would make things difficult for many people, forcing them to travel further & pay rising Parking costs.\r\n\r\nClosing the local branch may affect local commerce, where residents may have shopped in Caversham when they went to their bank they will now move further afield.\r\n\r\nI would like for the government to intervene & to try to keep this local bank open for the residents.  ","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-09-10T19:10:49.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:22.981Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:42:23.636Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-09-10T19:10:49.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26212,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26212.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Bring discipline back into schools","background":null,"additional_details":"It is high time that the government seriously addressed the on-going and current issues surrounding the appalling lack of discipline that is ever present within our schools today. School bullying wherein the perpetrators have a total disregard for current behaviour management schemes needs to be thoroughly addressed forthwith. The present educational climate in relation to pupil/bullying issues and discipline must be dealt with. I say bring back decent moral standards and corporal punishment, before it is too late.   ","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-22T03:41:14.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:45.488Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:11.238Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-22T03:41:14.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":46596,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/46596.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"York residents vote of no confidence","background":null,"additional_details":"This petition is an opportunity for residents of York to sign a no confidence vote against, council leader, Coun James Alexander and the City of York councils ruling Labour Party.\r\nAll the residents of York signing this e-petition demand that Council leader James Alexander and the ruling Labour Party that represent York, resign with immediate affect.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-03-01T19:14:45.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:55.084Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:40:50.029Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-03-01T19:14:45.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26215,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26215.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Police using water hose to break up & control riots is more acceptable than firing plastic (or live) bullets at protesters as in dictatorial regimes","background":null,"additional_details":"Police allowed to use water hose to break-up a riot is more acceptable (& less life threatening) than firing plastic (or even live) bullets. A small group of armed police force tend form a clique & support each other. Accidents can happen when a group of armed police are trained in effect to shoot first, ask questions later. There are incidences whereby a police officer shot a suspect dead a suspect carrying a table leg without warning because they thought he was carrying a shotgun, shot dead Menezes in a crowed tube as they thought he was a suicide bomber, an OAP, a barrister, a driver whilst attempting to stop him on a routine check. What about the police shooting dead a suspect in Ipswich about over 2 years ago? Where are the outcomes of the investigations by Police Complaints Authority? Suspects should not be shot dead without warning. Challenging armed suspects to surrender should be done in a more secluded place, away from crowded places.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-22T07:56:25.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:45.500Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:11.289Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-22T07:56:25.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26286,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26286.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"car insurance price rises","background":null,"additional_details":"Insurance companies should be banned from raising the premiums of innocent traffic  accident victims. If you are hit from behind by another car your premium will rise by £30-£50 and stay higher for several years. This is unfair on innocent drivers and should be stopped or the extra should be recoverable from the gulity parties insurance company.  Please sign if you feel innocent drivers are being unfairly penalised.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-23T17:32:21.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:45.734Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:12.088Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-23T17:32:21.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":"This is a matter for the insurance industry."},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":1468,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/1468.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Decriminalized and controlled legislation for growing and consuming cannabis","background":null,"additional_details":"There has been a lot of research into medical cannabis around the world where they have found it is useful in treating many things such as:\r\n\r\n- Multiple-Sclerosis\r\n- Asthma\r\n- Nausea\r\n- Insomnia\r\n- Skin Tumors.\r\n\r\nProfessor David Nutt released the Lancet ranking while he was working to advise the government on the misuse of drugs. The ranking which is based on scientific evidence shows cannabis does less physical harm than two LEGAL drugs available today alcohol and tobacco.\r\n\r\nIt is time the government researched a lot more about cannabis and brought in legislation based on a broad range of scientific evidence and not just a select few pieces. The government should look at if the actual criminalization of cannabis benefits the society as a whole or does it just bring in additional cost to the police and encourage organized drug trafficking.\r\n\r\nThere is a lot of information and issues on cannabis which have never been addressed inside the house of commons. This alone is a problem.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-08-04T10:25:14.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:26:25.400Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:32:35.004Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-08-04T10:25:14.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26430,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26430.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"kerbs","background":null,"additional_details":"where i live is a busy bus route, and parking is very difficult.\r\ni would like councils to make grass verges into hardcore surfaces.\r\nthis will help drivers and pedestrians, because we have had several near miss with cars having to mount the paths to clear oncoming cars.\r\nand the grass verges are just mud holes this time of year,this will help my communities, and more if the problem was looked at all over.\r\ni have spoken to my local council,and was given no answer just excuses. they may do sometime if some one is run over but that will be to late for them.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-28T18:33:51.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.175Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:13.583Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-28T18:33:51.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":"This is a matter for local highway authorities."},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26305,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26305.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Victims - Access to Justice When Failed By The Legal System","background":null,"additional_details":"This petition is for members of the public who are victims of crime and have been let down with the Justice System and one or all it's agencies.  The law as it stands allows the victim no recourse other than to ask the Attorney General to look at the sentence - if one is passed and ask him to appeal an unduly lenient sentence.  If you buy a pair of shoes and they are faulty you have more legal rights than you do if your loved one is brutally murdered, in 2012 this cannot be a fair and just system.  When Judges undermine other Judges how can we trust in this broken system?  ","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-24T10:42:30.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:45.801Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:12.294Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-24T10:42:30.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54759,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54759.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Save The Caversham Nationwide Branch","background":null,"additional_details":"Save the Caversham Nationwide Branch","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-09-10T22:53:39.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:22.996Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:42:23.689Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-09-10T22:53:39.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26347,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26347.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Castle Doctrine - An Englishman's Castle","background":null,"additional_details":"An American's home is his castle.\r\n\r\nA Castle Doctrine (also known as a Castle Law or a Defense of Habitation Law) is an American legal doctrine arising from English common law that designates one's place of residence (or, in some states, any place legally occupied, such as one's car or place of work) as a place in which one enjoys protection from illegal trespassing and violent attack. It then goes on to give a person the legal right to use deadly force to defend their place, and any other innocent persons legally inside it, from violent attack or an intrusion which may lead to violent attack. In a legal context, therefore, use of deadly force which actually results in death may be defended as justifiable homicide under the Castle Doctrine.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-26T09:58:56.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:45.919Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:12.706Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-26T09:58:56.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26399,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26399.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Retain The Broadcasting Of The Football League Show","background":null,"additional_details":"The Football League show is set to be taken down from BBC One due to BBC cuts. We also understand that the boxing day and new years eve edition got taken down due to budget reasons, confirmed by Manish Bhasin, the presenter of the show.  Therefore I would like to see the free to air show The Football League Show retained in 2012.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-27T20:19:45.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.076Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:13.238Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-27T20:19:45.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26437,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26437.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Banksy to carry the olympic torch.","background":null,"additional_details":"It would be spectacular for Bansky to carry the olympic torch into the stadium and reveal himself. It has been a 100 years since the olympics have come to London and how enterprising it would be for all art and sports lovers to be treated in this way. No other olympics could match this very British secret. ","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-29T00:29:08.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.203Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:13.659Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-29T00:29:08.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26510,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26510.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"larger fines for motoring offences","background":null,"additional_details":"To indtoduce or to replace a serious of offence with larger on the spot fines.\r\nmany offences should be dealt with by larger on the spot fines starting from £500 per offence plus increased points\r\nexample where this could be implemented, on a mobile telephone, not wearing a seatbelt, having your field of vision obsucred with badly placed sat nave, failure to indicate sufficiently at road junctions.\r\nthese offences could either be witnessed by a police officer or captured of CCTV\r\nthis would free up court times, act as a detterent and make offenders pay for their acts.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-30T12:42:35.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.432Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:14.390Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-30T12:42:35.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":46598,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/46598.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Revise Definition of Rape in 2013","background":null,"additional_details":"The definition of rape in the UK is drafted from the point of view of a man, despite the crime being committed against a woman.\r\n\r\nIn 2013, the UK needs to revise this to include the point of view of a woman.\r\n\r\nThe UK needs to further recognise the many sexual assaults that are being committed against men in the UK.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-03-01T19:57:48.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:55.088Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:40:50.047Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-03-01T19:57:48.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26556,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26556.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Propose Martin Lewis, Money Saving Expert, for a New Years Honour in 2013","background":null,"additional_details":"Martin Lewis, Money Saving Expert, is the most searched man in the UK.  He runs the two biggest money sites in the UK, his Money Saving Expert site and his site for Money Saving Expert forums. His main site attracts 10 million users a month and over six million receive the Martin's Money Tips email.\r\n\r\nHe has successfully ran campaigns on bank charges, Payment Protection Insurance and helped consumers to reclaim council tax and mortgage fees.\r\n\r\nHe is also founder and chair of the MSE Charity which so far has distributed over £200,000 of grants to consumer finance education charities and individuals.\r\n\r\nGiven the millions of people who have been helped by Martin, proposing him for a New Years Honour would seem to be apt recognition by the Government and our Queen.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-31T13:57:24.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.608Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:14.816Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-31T13:57:24.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"honours","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26476,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26476.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Replace Steve Claridge with Rob 'npower' Collins","background":null,"additional_details":"It is rumored that the BBC is set to bring the Football League Show to an end for bugetory reasons. The signatories to this petition believe that the show is important to many sports fans and that the BBC would be forced to reconsider if ratings massively increased and believe that the best method to achieve this is for the government to pressure the BBC to remove Steve Claridge as a pundit and replace him with Rob 'npower' Collins. Claridge is regarded by many viewers as one of the worst football pundits but Mr Collins would keep the viewers hooked with his limitless knowledge of obscure facts and figures, the fact that Ray Stubbs is a Tranmere fan and the alarmingly long list of football personalities that are 'ex-Tranmere'","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-29T19:20:35.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.327Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:14.006Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-29T19:20:35.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26538,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26538.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"zero tolerance on alcohol fuelled violence","background":null,"additional_details":"*New laws implemented to help prevent or reduce violence from alcohol, i.e if a premises license is not being complied with, immediate closure should be a likely outcome. *Licensing powers are reactive, they should be proactive, cutting away all the bureaucracy and delays.*Bouncers/nightlife marshalls to be placed inside of pubs and clubs not just on doors. To be fully trained on how to deal with aggressive behaviour and how to calm a building aggressive or confrontation situation.*All door supervisors should wear high visibility jackets inside and outside licensed premises.*Compulsory CCTV monitoring in large pubs/clubs to create 'the big brother effect'. *Tougher sentencing for drunken violence related attacks (Full sentences to be completed/ no early release for good behaviour or if plead guilty)*kicking and stamping during an assault should be an aggravating factor when sentenced. Only in extreme circumstances should imprisonment be avoided.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-30T20:58:52.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.536Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:14.635Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-30T20:58:52.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26523,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26523.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Abolish the requirement of TV Licences for private households.","background":null,"additional_details":"TV licensing is a blanket style operation, of which every house hold must always pay the fixed fee.\r\nThis is unacceptable and breeds fear for what other fees in said style could be introduced in the future.\r\n\r\nSuch taxation should be firmly judged as to how it can be that you \"MUST\" pay, or go to prison/receive a nasty fine for failing to adhere,\r\nfor something we do not fully understand as to why we pay for it again and again.\r\n\r\nTV Providers such as Sky, Virgin, and Freeview etc, are paid for services/generate an incredible amount of money per annum.\r\n\r\nPerhaps if TV Licensing truly is found to be 100% necessary, then it should be sought from these organisations\r\nor the BBC should perhaps begin to advertise, just like most other channels, and find 100% of their money from advertising.\r\n\r\nIt is a disgrace that this can be enforced and its time to make a change to this long and greatly disliked,\r\nincredibly confusing licensing/tax to be completely abolished for private households.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-30T15:35:34.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.476Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:14.512Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-30T15:35:34.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":1487,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/1487.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"NO! to restoring capital punishment","background":null,"additional_details":"From Amnesty International \"The death penalty legitimizes an irreversible act of violence by the state and will inevitably claim innocent victims. As long as human justice remains fallible, the risk of executing the innocent can never be eliminated\"\r\n\r\nIn 1988 a survey was conducted for the UN to determine the relation between the death penalty and homicide rates. This was then updated in 1996. It concluded:\r\n\r\n\"...research has failed to provide scientific proof that executions have a greater deterrent effect than life imprisonment. Such proof is unlikely to be forthcoming. The evidence as a whole still gives no positive support to the deterrent hypothesis.\"\r\n\r\nCapital Punishment therefore can be seen as revenge and not justice, and this has no place in our modern society.\r\n\r\nOn this basis we petition the government that no action is taken that could re-instate the death sentence.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-08-04T10:33:15.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:26:25.459Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:32:35.189Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-08-04T10:33:15.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":46600,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/46600.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"An equal pension for women","background":null,"additional_details":"An analysis by the House of Commons Library found that 430,000 women, born between April 1952 and April 1953, who will retire before the new pension scheme takes effect in four years, could be £1,900 a year or £36.55 a week worse off than a man of the same age.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-03-01T20:00:56.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:55.096Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:40:50.076Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-03-01T20:00:56.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54762,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54762.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Royal British Legion's 2014 Real Poppy project","background":null,"additional_details":"The Heritage Lottery Fund has rejected the British Legion's application for funding to plant millions of real poppies to commemorate WWI.\r\n\r\nWe call upon the Department for Culture, Media and Sport to instruct the National Heritage Memorial Fund to reconsider their decision, and to work alongside the Royal British Legion to ensure their bid fits all the criteria to allow the project to go ahead.\r\n ","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-09-11T08:04:48.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:23.007Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:42:23.735Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-09-11T08:04:48.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":"The Government cannot interfere with HLF decisions."},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":27610,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/27610.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"we the poor tax payer will not pay for a royal yacht","background":null,"additional_details":"we the poor tax payers will not fund a royal yacht in these times of economic austerity","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-01-16T23:03:45.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:49.928Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:25.365Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-16T23:03:45.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}}]}