{"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=204&parliament=2&state=rejected","first":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?state=rejected","last":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=562&state=rejected","next":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=205&state=rejected","prev":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=203&state=rejected"},"data":[{"type":"archived-petition","id":26305,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26305.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Victims - Access to Justice When Failed By The Legal System","background":null,"additional_details":"This petition is for members of the public who are victims of crime and have been let down with the Justice System and one or all it's agencies.  The law as it stands allows the victim no recourse other than to ask the Attorney General to look at the sentence - if one is passed and ask him to appeal an unduly lenient sentence.  If you buy a pair of shoes and they are faulty you have more legal rights than you do if your loved one is brutally murdered, in 2012 this cannot be a fair and just system.  When Judges undermine other Judges how can we trust in this broken system?  ","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-24T10:42:30.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:45.801Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:12.294Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-24T10:42:30.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54759,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54759.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Save The Caversham Nationwide Branch","background":null,"additional_details":"Save the Caversham Nationwide Branch","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-09-10T22:53:39.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:22.996Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:42:23.689Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-09-10T22:53:39.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26347,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26347.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Castle Doctrine - An Englishman's Castle","background":null,"additional_details":"An American's home is his castle.\r\n\r\nA Castle Doctrine (also known as a Castle Law or a Defense of Habitation Law) is an American legal doctrine arising from English common law that designates one's place of residence (or, in some states, any place legally occupied, such as one's car or place of work) as a place in which one enjoys protection from illegal trespassing and violent attack. It then goes on to give a person the legal right to use deadly force to defend their place, and any other innocent persons legally inside it, from violent attack or an intrusion which may lead to violent attack. In a legal context, therefore, use of deadly force which actually results in death may be defended as justifiable homicide under the Castle Doctrine.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-26T09:58:56.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:45.919Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:12.706Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-26T09:58:56.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26399,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26399.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Retain The Broadcasting Of The Football League Show","background":null,"additional_details":"The Football League show is set to be taken down from BBC One due to BBC cuts. We also understand that the boxing day and new years eve edition got taken down due to budget reasons, confirmed by Manish Bhasin, the presenter of the show.  Therefore I would like to see the free to air show The Football League Show retained in 2012.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-27T20:19:45.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.076Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:13.238Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-27T20:19:45.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26437,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26437.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Banksy to carry the olympic torch.","background":null,"additional_details":"It would be spectacular for Bansky to carry the olympic torch into the stadium and reveal himself. It has been a 100 years since the olympics have come to London and how enterprising it would be for all art and sports lovers to be treated in this way. No other olympics could match this very British secret. ","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-29T00:29:08.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.203Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:13.659Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-29T00:29:08.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26510,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26510.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"larger fines for motoring offences","background":null,"additional_details":"To indtoduce or to replace a serious of offence with larger on the spot fines.\r\nmany offences should be dealt with by larger on the spot fines starting from £500 per offence plus increased points\r\nexample where this could be implemented, on a mobile telephone, not wearing a seatbelt, having your field of vision obsucred with badly placed sat nave, failure to indicate sufficiently at road junctions.\r\nthese offences could either be witnessed by a police officer or captured of CCTV\r\nthis would free up court times, act as a detterent and make offenders pay for their acts.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-30T12:42:35.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.432Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:14.390Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-30T12:42:35.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":46598,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/46598.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Revise Definition of Rape in 2013","background":null,"additional_details":"The definition of rape in the UK is drafted from the point of view of a man, despite the crime being committed against a woman.\r\n\r\nIn 2013, the UK needs to revise this to include the point of view of a woman.\r\n\r\nThe UK needs to further recognise the many sexual assaults that are being committed against men in the UK.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-03-01T19:57:48.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:55.088Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:40:50.047Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-03-01T19:57:48.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26556,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26556.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Propose Martin Lewis, Money Saving Expert, for a New Years Honour in 2013","background":null,"additional_details":"Martin Lewis, Money Saving Expert, is the most searched man in the UK.  He runs the two biggest money sites in the UK, his Money Saving Expert site and his site for Money Saving Expert forums. His main site attracts 10 million users a month and over six million receive the Martin's Money Tips email.\r\n\r\nHe has successfully ran campaigns on bank charges, Payment Protection Insurance and helped consumers to reclaim council tax and mortgage fees.\r\n\r\nHe is also founder and chair of the MSE Charity which so far has distributed over £200,000 of grants to consumer finance education charities and individuals.\r\n\r\nGiven the millions of people who have been helped by Martin, proposing him for a New Years Honour would seem to be apt recognition by the Government and our Queen.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-31T13:57:24.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.608Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:14.816Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-31T13:57:24.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"honours","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26476,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26476.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Replace Steve Claridge with Rob 'npower' Collins","background":null,"additional_details":"It is rumored that the BBC is set to bring the Football League Show to an end for bugetory reasons. The signatories to this petition believe that the show is important to many sports fans and that the BBC would be forced to reconsider if ratings massively increased and believe that the best method to achieve this is for the government to pressure the BBC to remove Steve Claridge as a pundit and replace him with Rob 'npower' Collins. Claridge is regarded by many viewers as one of the worst football pundits but Mr Collins would keep the viewers hooked with his limitless knowledge of obscure facts and figures, the fact that Ray Stubbs is a Tranmere fan and the alarmingly long list of football personalities that are 'ex-Tranmere'","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-29T19:20:35.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.327Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:14.006Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-29T19:20:35.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26538,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26538.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"zero tolerance on alcohol fuelled violence","background":null,"additional_details":"*New laws implemented to help prevent or reduce violence from alcohol, i.e if a premises license is not being complied with, immediate closure should be a likely outcome. *Licensing powers are reactive, they should be proactive, cutting away all the bureaucracy and delays.*Bouncers/nightlife marshalls to be placed inside of pubs and clubs not just on doors. To be fully trained on how to deal with aggressive behaviour and how to calm a building aggressive or confrontation situation.*All door supervisors should wear high visibility jackets inside and outside licensed premises.*Compulsory CCTV monitoring in large pubs/clubs to create 'the big brother effect'. *Tougher sentencing for drunken violence related attacks (Full sentences to be completed/ no early release for good behaviour or if plead guilty)*kicking and stamping during an assault should be an aggravating factor when sentenced. Only in extreme circumstances should imprisonment be avoided.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-30T20:58:52.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.536Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:14.635Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-30T20:58:52.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26523,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26523.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Abolish the requirement of TV Licences for private households.","background":null,"additional_details":"TV licensing is a blanket style operation, of which every house hold must always pay the fixed fee.\r\nThis is unacceptable and breeds fear for what other fees in said style could be introduced in the future.\r\n\r\nSuch taxation should be firmly judged as to how it can be that you \"MUST\" pay, or go to prison/receive a nasty fine for failing to adhere,\r\nfor something we do not fully understand as to why we pay for it again and again.\r\n\r\nTV Providers such as Sky, Virgin, and Freeview etc, are paid for services/generate an incredible amount of money per annum.\r\n\r\nPerhaps if TV Licensing truly is found to be 100% necessary, then it should be sought from these organisations\r\nor the BBC should perhaps begin to advertise, just like most other channels, and find 100% of their money from advertising.\r\n\r\nIt is a disgrace that this can be enforced and its time to make a change to this long and greatly disliked,\r\nincredibly confusing licensing/tax to be completely abolished for private households.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-30T15:35:34.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.476Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:14.512Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-30T15:35:34.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":1487,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/1487.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"NO! to restoring capital punishment","background":null,"additional_details":"From Amnesty International \"The death penalty legitimizes an irreversible act of violence by the state and will inevitably claim innocent victims. As long as human justice remains fallible, the risk of executing the innocent can never be eliminated\"\r\n\r\nIn 1988 a survey was conducted for the UN to determine the relation between the death penalty and homicide rates. This was then updated in 1996. It concluded:\r\n\r\n\"...research has failed to provide scientific proof that executions have a greater deterrent effect than life imprisonment. Such proof is unlikely to be forthcoming. The evidence as a whole still gives no positive support to the deterrent hypothesis.\"\r\n\r\nCapital Punishment therefore can be seen as revenge and not justice, and this has no place in our modern society.\r\n\r\nOn this basis we petition the government that no action is taken that could re-instate the death sentence.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-08-04T10:33:15.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:26:25.459Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:32:35.189Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-08-04T10:33:15.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":46600,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/46600.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"An equal pension for women","background":null,"additional_details":"An analysis by the House of Commons Library found that 430,000 women, born between April 1952 and April 1953, who will retire before the new pension scheme takes effect in four years, could be £1,900 a year or £36.55 a week worse off than a man of the same age.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-03-01T20:00:56.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:55.096Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:40:50.076Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-03-01T20:00:56.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54762,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54762.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Royal British Legion's 2014 Real Poppy project","background":null,"additional_details":"The Heritage Lottery Fund has rejected the British Legion's application for funding to plant millions of real poppies to commemorate WWI.\r\n\r\nWe call upon the Department for Culture, Media and Sport to instruct the National Heritage Memorial Fund to reconsider their decision, and to work alongside the Royal British Legion to ensure their bid fits all the criteria to allow the project to go ahead.\r\n ","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-09-11T08:04:48.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:23.007Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:42:23.735Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-09-11T08:04:48.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":"The Government cannot interfere with HLF decisions."},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":27610,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/27610.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"we the poor tax payer will not pay for a royal yacht","background":null,"additional_details":"we the poor tax payers will not fund a royal yacht in these times of economic austerity","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-01-16T23:03:45.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:49.928Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:25.365Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-16T23:03:45.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26550,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26550.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"A National Screening Programme for Prostate Cancer","background":null,"additional_details":"I request for a National Screening Programme for Prostate Cancer to be implemented from the age of 40 . Also with the option of PSA checks annually on request to your GP from the age of 30.\r\n\r\nThe implementation of an early National screening programme would save tens of thousands of lives every year and I believe would save the NHS millions.\r\n\r\nProstate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the UK. 37,000 cases are diagnosed each year.\r\n\r\nI dispute the European findings that this would cause more harm than good and request further research and investigation to be implemented and analysed.\r\n\r\nMost cases go undiagnosed and are often not caught in time to cure or treat efficiently. Causing financial strain on the NHS due to higher cost methods of treatment that need to be implemented for advanced prostate cancer and the spread of secondary cancer.\r\n\r\nSave lives and grant this application.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-31T11:52:36.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.581Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:14.751Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-31T11:52:36.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54764,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54764.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Birmingham Met College Must Not Ban The Niqab","background":null,"additional_details":"Birmingham Met College has decided to ban students form wearing hats, hoodies and face veils (the Niqab). Dame Christine Braddock DBE the principal of Birmingham Met College has claimed that banning these items of clothing are to enable the faces of students to be visible for identification and security. Since hats, caps and hoodies do not cover the face, this is clearly an attempt to discriminate against Muslim women who wish to practices their faith in this way.\r\n\r\nThis discriminatory policy must me stopped so please add your name to the petition to reverse this decision.\r\n\r\nThank you. ","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-09-11T08:58:45.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:23.015Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:42:23.784Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-09-11T08:58:45.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":38439,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/38439.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Ark Royal","background":null,"additional_details":"Stop Ark Royal being sold for scrap in Turkey, KEEP IT IN BRITAIN, CREATING BRITISH JOBS, AND BRITISH PROFITS, PAYING BRITISH TAXES","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-09-10T15:11:27.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:24.629Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:39:21.196Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-09-10T15:11:27.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":"Petition id: 38386 exists regarding Ark Royal"},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":27723,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/27723.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Say NO to new yacht being built for the Queen.","background":null,"additional_details":"Say NO to David Cameron's plan to build a new yacht costing over 80 million pounds as gift for the Queens Jubilee .","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-01-17T20:56:41.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:50.232Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:26.269Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-17T20:56:41.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26574,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26574.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"controle the price of cannabis through legalisation","background":null,"additional_details":"in the last 5 years cannabis has gone up in price by over 100%, this is largely due to supply and demand and it will continue to go up in price due to this.\r\n\r\nwith less work about and the price of everything going up it seams to me that people will be finding it vey hard to afford cannabis (I am).\r\n\r\nbecause cannabis is part of a underworld there are a lot of bad people involved and they do not care how much people pay or weather they can really afford it.\r\n\r\nI believe that it should be legalised and taxed, this should help balance supply and demand and hopefully bring the price back to a sensible sum, or at least people would be able get a standard quality of cannabis if they cant grow there own.\r\n\r\nat the moment i would guess a lot of the money spent on cannabis is lost from the banking system or spent abroad, if it was sold legally and taxed it could help our country greatly and could also bring tourists to spend money in our country, like in holland (Amsterdam).\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-12-31T23:38:47.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.668Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:15.046Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-31T23:38:47.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":6377,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/6377.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Appoint 'ordinary'  licence-fee-payers as BBC Trustees","background":null,"additional_details":"I petition that the BBC Charter be amended so that the Trustees include a majority of members of the general public to ensure that the Corporation reflects the views of the majority of licence-fee-payers.\r\n\r\nThe BBC Trustees are supposed to represent the 'ordinary' licence-fee-payer, but are themselves members of the elitist, liberal clique that control the Corporation's policy.\r\n\r\nCurrently, the official criteria for suitability ensures that only “the great and the good” are eligible.\r\n\r\nThe BBC over the years has exerted far more influence than the Murdock organisation and fear of its power has prevented MPs from representing the overwhelmingly majority view of the electorate on matters like immigration, Europe, antisocial behaviour etc.\r\n\r\nMeanwhile (as is the current procedure) the Prime Minister should advice HM Queen to appoint members of the general public to replace at least half of current BBC Trustees.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-08-07T11:12:07.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:26:40.933Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:33:28.399Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-08-07T11:12:07.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"honours","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26585,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26585.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop punishing the majority for the actions of the minority","background":null,"additional_details":"With the advent of a knee-jerk reaction by the Prime Minister over his ordering of minimum pricing for alcohol he graphically demonstrates his inability properly to deal with the problems of a minority of individuals making a choice to undertake activity which damages them.  The response is ALWAYS to issue new rules and regulations which damage the majority of the population.  It has been said that sun-beds should be banned because 1 in 4 of users abuse them and end up giving themselves cancer.  The fact that 3 out of 4 users do so properly and do not end up with cancer is ignored.  The minority of miscreants ought to have action taken against them, NOT the majority.  Deny the 1 out of 4 who give themselves cancer access to free medical treatment; deny binge drinkers access to free medical treatment - stop asking taxpayers to fund the self destructive activities of these people they should NOT be visited upon the majority.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-01-01T11:46:54.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.699Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:15.141Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-01T11:46:54.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":6241,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/6241.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"the general public has no confidence in this coalition government","background":null,"additional_details":"the general public has no confidence in this coalition government","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-08-07T02:44:49.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:26:40.513Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:33:27.014Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-08-07T02:44:49.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26616,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26616.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Milton Keynes Grid Roads","background":null,"additional_details":"MK Partnership was set up by the previous government. It is an unelected quango, and treats the concerns of MK residents with contempt.\r\n\r\nMK has grid roads, which give us a pedestrian casualty rate far below the UK average, cleaner air as cars travel efficiently, and prosperity as working people can get in, out and across the city quickly.\r\n\r\nMK Partnership has, ever since 2004, ensured that where they have authority, no grid roads have been created or extended, and that existing grid roads have been downgraded.\r\n\r\nIf localism means anything, then MK Partnership must be abolished. They work contrary to the wishes of MK residents, ignore local transport policies, and go directly against the Core Strategy, which was published under the previous LibDem council and is now agreed by the Conservative administration.\r\n\r\nAbolish MK Partnership now.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-01-02T11:11:44.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.799Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:15.443Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-02T11:11:44.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":"This is a matter for the local authority."},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26635,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26635.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Men Get Eating Disorders Too","background":null,"additional_details":"Eating disorders are commonly perceived as illnesses which only affect females, with a strong association to teenage girls, however, in reality they are suffered by people of all ages, irrespective of age, social background, race, sexuality or gender. Current research indicates that around 10% to 20% of all cases are male, however, due to the stigma and disadvantage male sufferers face, the true figure is likely to be far higher, due to male sufferers often not seeking medical help. Once a sufferer does seek help there is a worrying lack of awareness and education amongst health professionals when dealing with male cases, often leading to misdiagnoses or delayed treatment, which further increases the isolation and risk to the sufferer. We are calling on the government to make essential changes in the provision of individual, specific care on both a policy and service delivery level to eradicate the barriers faced not only at the point of access but throughout treatment and recovery.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-01-02T18:09:46.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.888Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:15.639Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-02T18:09:46.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":46607,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/46607.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Torquay Outside Seating","background":null,"additional_details":"Torbay Council have served local businesses with notice that this years charges for their Pavement Licences will increase by 600%.\r\n\r\nThe businesses already pay high rents and business rates, and only turn a profit from their outside seating when the sun shines, and so this is hugely unfair and has been tagged by the local press as a \"tax on cafe culture\".\r\n\r\nCoupled with the fact that plans are being quietly approved for a 7 story, 5 star hotel, on the Marina Car Park, next to the neglected and empty Pavillion building,  locals are rightly beginning to protest.\r\n\r\nThis campaign is backed by the Federation of Small Businesses and the Towns Centre Company, and since the story broke yesterday (Thursday 28th Feb) has had huge support on social network sites.\r\n\r\nThis petition will be presented to all local councillors, and Torbay's Mayor, Gordon Oliver. ","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-03-02T00:48:52.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:55.111Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:40:50.118Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-03-02T00:48:52.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":"This is a matter for the local authority - central Government (to whom e-petitions are directed) has no power to intervene."},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":6419,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/6419.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Nurture Growth in UK Industry ","background":null,"additional_details":"  It's time to admit that we have let Industry in the UK down.\r\n\r\nWe can't rely indefinitely Financial Services, and Banking for long term growth.\r\n\r\nWe need to get back to manufacturing products, creating something tangible for the UK economy.\r\n\r\nSupportive tax structures for Manufacturing, subsidies to enable competitive labour rates, provision of skilled workforce through improved  apprenticeships, creating the right conditions for favourable export, and stopping the migration/''sell off''  of knowledge to regions like the Far East, where they care little for copyright or UK prosperity.\r\n\r\nSenior Politicians are too interested in their Non-Executive Directorship's in UK Banking Institutions post Political career, to begin to turn the tide of Industrial decline in the UK.\r\n\r\nFirst we must get parliament to wake up!\r\n\r\nIf we carry on down the current path, what will be left of the UK?","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-08-07T12:23:37.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:26:41.048Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:33:28.738Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-08-07T12:23:37.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":28013,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/28013.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Say Yes to Gay Marriage","background":null,"additional_details":"This is really simple... Say YES to gay marriages!","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-01-20T20:17:17.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:51.114Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:28.914Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-20T20:17:17.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26646,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26646.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Be Fair - Reduce fares on Kent's slower and mainline and metro serivces.","background":null,"additional_details":"At present an unfair Complete Monopoly is awarded to the winning bidder of the Kent franchise. Thus controlling a monopoly of high speed and \"cattle truck\" metro and mainline services.                                                            This allows Favour to HS services ( in some cases by scandalously slowing existing services) offers no chance of  competition that privatiation was supposed bring.\r\n                                                                               In the 2014 we the Kent rail users, Supporters and Residents and demand that franchise requirements after the 2014 Tender. Privdes competition on Kent railways bring a reduction to the \"Cattle truck\" fares rip off and monopoly presently enjoyed by Southeastern.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-01-03T03:49:41.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.922Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:15.738Z","opened_at":"2012-01-03T10:58:51.000Z","closed_at":"2013-01-03T10:58:51.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-03T03:49:41.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":"Removed at request of petitioner."},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54772,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54772.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"holiday companies should keep the same prices during holidays as during term time]#","background":null,"additional_details":"Are you sick of holiday companies hiking up the price of family holidays during school holidays? I am, especially when you can clearly see a massive price difference in the weeks before and after the school holidays. Now the government have introduced this fine if parents take their children out of school to take them on holiday, are they in cahoots?? Lets make a stand and stop the travel companies charging the earth simply because demand is higher.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-09-11T12:21:44.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:23.042Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:42:23.873Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-09-11T12:21:44.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":46613,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/46613.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Change the law to compell NHS organisations to allow patients to communicate with them by email.","background":null,"additional_details":"It is almost impossible to find an email contact address with most NHS organisations.  Email allows the author to retain a copy of his/her correspondence AND to prove, when it proves necessary, that the correspondence was actually sent and received by the addressee.  In this day and age it can only be for their own deniability that the NHS does not allow email correspondence between patients and its organisations.  It is hugely more expensive for patients to be able to record telephone call conversations with the NHS than it is to keep email records.  WE MUST BE GIVEN THAT OPPORTUNITY.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-03-02T12:58:10.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:55.134Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:40:50.202Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-03-02T12:58:10.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":1489,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/1489.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Pull out of the European Economic Community","background":null,"additional_details":"With Greece economically finished and Italy threatening to follow suit that would leave the UK with a £43 Billion additional debt, this country cannot afford to waste its money on a failing institution like the EEC.\r\n\r\nWith a million unemployed young people, we can only restore the UK economy by stopping economic migration which is an unmitigated burden on public services. This would cease to be a problem once we pull out of the EEC.\r\n\r\nAs we get all our luxury goods from the Asian tiger economies, which are increasing in strength this century, it make better sense to secure effective trading links with the wider part of the world which was responsible for putting the 'great' in Great Britain.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-08-04T10:34:11.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:26:25.467Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:32:35.230Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-08-04T10:34:11.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54773,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54773.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"give anonymity in rape cases to both parties","background":null,"additional_details":"Change the law on rape and sexual abuse to give anonymity to both alleged accused and alleged accuser, at least till after the trial.If the case is proven,they can be named after the event.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-09-11T12:28:43.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:23.046Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:42:23.899Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-09-11T12:28:43.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":6458,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/6458.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Allow discussion of e-petition details","background":null,"additional_details":"Allow discussion about the details - like for criminal sentencing petitions: Why is the 3-strikes idea better than two or four strikes and should a third strike have to be more than a trivial crime? Would you really want someone going to jail permanently for throwing a custard pie at a politician or businessman? Why?\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-08-07T13:07:35.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:26:41.157Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:33:29.111Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-08-07T13:07:35.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26659,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26659.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"HMG should decide & legislate on the confusion about which have priority (or similar), RACIAL groups or a RELGIOUS group?","background":null,"additional_details":"Which have priority or the same - racial groups practising their customs (like wearing turbans, wearing burkas) or believers’ religious observances? Sikhs/Jews an ethnic race, cult or religion? In Mandla v Dowell Lee (1983) House of Lords found that Sikhs constituted a RACIAL group when a Sikh boy was refused a place at a school because he wore a turban. The appeal was therefore allowed under Race Relations Act. This judgement was based on Sikhs long shared history & collective consciousness distinguishing them from other groups in customs, geographical origin, language, being recognised as a separate group in the surrounding community. Jews regard a person a Jew if born of Jewish mother. A person can be a Jew even if not practising Judaism. Likewise can a person be converted to Sikhism by believing in karma & reincarnation unless BORN a Sikh? Belief in reincarnation does not require a believer to start wearing turbans, bangles, ceremonial swords, long beard, etc. ","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-01-03T09:49:43.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:46.943Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:15.797Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-03T09:49:43.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54775,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54775.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"IRAQ WAR - prevention/withdrawal of Honours","background":null,"additional_details":"The Government should never accept any recommendation for any honour award to be made to anyone criticised by the Chilcott Enquiry into the 2003 Iraq War and should promptly seek the withdrawal of any honour award already granted to anyone, also so criticised,  after the commencement of the War.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-09-11T13:04:38.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:23.053Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:42:23.925Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-09-11T13:04:38.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"honours","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":75327,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/75327.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Maintenance of the Bomber Command War Memorial","background":null,"additional_details":"Squadron Leader Les Munro, aged 95, is the last surviving Dambusters pilot. He is proposing to sell his well-earned war medals on 25th March 2015 to raise money for the Bomber Command memorial 'out of a sense of comradeship'. Currently, the charity, the RAF Benevolent Fund, has the duty to pay for its maintenance and upkeep in perpetuity at a cost of £50,000 a year. The upkeep should be paid for by the Ministry of Defence in recognition of the part played by Les and his comrades in World War 2. It should not be up to an individual to sell his hard earned war medals to fund this maintenance.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2015-03-02T21:23:40.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:33.548Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:46:09.912Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2015-03-02T21:23:40.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":"This is a duplicate of ID 75310"},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26685,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26685.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"FALKLANDS INDEPENDANCE - U.K. SOLIDARITY","background":null,"additional_details":"It cost the UK over 255 dead, many more wounded, scores mentally effected & a lot of money that could have been better spent, when the Argentina military thought we were indifferent to the sovereignty of these islands.  Again the sabre rattling has started & we must ensure that it does not happen, again.  One way, would be to orchestrate additional military training on the islands, instead of elsewhere. We could ask our Commonwealth special forces if they could do some foul weather training in the area. Anything to remind  Argentina we are not too far away.  Anything of additional military traffic to the regular service personel stationed there, should be encouraged.  The Government should also question the legality of banning individual international shipping from designated South American ports.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-01-03T16:18:30.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:47.035Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:16.138Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-03T16:18:30.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":38833,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/38833.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"increase in price of flights and holidays during school holidays","background":null,"additional_details":"Ensure the price of flights and holidays are the same all year round, to ensure families are not penalised for taking their children away in school holidays.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-09-17T11:27:28.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:25.991Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:39:25.876Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-09-17T11:27:28.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26732,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26732.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"UK time should be keep constant all year round as it will be less confusing, therefore cause fewer accidents and saves lives as a result","background":null,"additional_details":"HMG should facilitate adequate debates & consultation whether to keep UK time constant all year (GMT, European time, etc) as it will be less confusing; therefore cause fewer accidents, saving lives as a result. This is because people can get ‘acclimatised’ & habituated towards the daylight hours available to them during various times of their usual daily routines, like going to and from work, school, shopping, etc. What is accepted as the chronological time at any fleeting moments in time, interacts & affects people’s idiosyncratic & varied lives. Therefore it is important to have a bottom-up approach by having proper debates and consultation on whether UK time should be kept constant all year; either at GMT, BST or continental time (2 hours ahead of GMT).","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-01-04T15:47:50.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:47.148Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:16.458Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-04T15:47:50.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26773,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26773.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Parking tickets for hazzards only  not for petty reasons","background":null,"additional_details":"Parking tickets for people parked on yellow lines, in disabled bays and where they are causing traffic problems etc... are justified. But traffic wardens are now hovering round cars and car parks where tickets are due to expire and where drivers are slightly over white lines and fining people up to £100, sometimes more for very minor or in some cases no reason what-so-ever! During a reccession where people are strapped for cash fining people for going over their paid ticket by 1minute or because they have gone over a white line of a free carpark is a rip off of the public and the government need to address councils and companies who are making money by loittering traffic wardens and fining people often for very petty reasons! Parking tickets should be issued where a hazzard is occuring not for reasons such as being 1 minute over your parking ticket! ","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-01-05T12:05:39.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:47.284Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:16.986Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-05T12:05:39.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":"Local highway authorities are responsible for the work of traffic wardens.  What is the petition asking central government to do?"},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":38605,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/38605.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Shut Down The Sun","background":null,"additional_details":"To shut down The Sun after the damming reports found from the Hillsborough disaster 1989. The company and the editor have been forced to apologise but now they have been found to lie they should now be shut down permanently.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-09-13T10:59:02.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:25.206Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:39:23.284Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-09-13T10:59:02.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":"In the UK, the press is not subject to state regulation. The Government believes that this is fundamental to our democracy. That is why the government does not interfere in what a newspaper or magazine chooses to publish. However, with this freedom comes great responsibility.\r\n\r\nNewspapers must, of course, abide by the law, but they also sign up to a Code of Practice, overseen by the independent Press Complaints Commission (PCC). The Editor's Code of Practice sets a benchmark for the standards the press is expected to maintain.\r\n\r\nIf you would like any more information on the PCC and the Editors’ Code of Practice, it can be found on the PCC’s website at: http://www.pcc.org.uk."},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54780,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54780.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Change the oath or affirmation of allegiance to require a legally binding bond between the elected MP's and their constituents.","background":null,"additional_details":"The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards publishes an MP’s Code of Conduct but in the light of recent events - for instance our Prime Minister’s support for action against Syria without public or parliamentary support, Mr Clegg's promise to end top up fees, and Mr Gove's aggressive refusal to see a constituent, this voluntary code isn't strong enough.\r\n\r\nIn order to prevent deception, false promises or simply refusing to represent ALL constituents, we propose that the MP’s oath or affirmation of allegiance be altered & become legally binding, as follows:\r\n\r\n“and to serve without favour, to the best of my ability & with regard to the reasonable expectations of all my constituents.”\r\n\r\nSuch as oath or affirmation should be enforced on each MP personally not collectively by law.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2013-09-11T14:28:54.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:23.069Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:42:23.983Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-09-11T14:28:54.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26781,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26781.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Sack Dianne Abbott on the grounds of racism","background":null,"additional_details":"Dianne Abbott said on Twitter 'White people love playing divide & rule, we should not play their game'.\r\n\r\nNow imagine a white male MP saying 'Black people love playing divide & rule, we should not play their game'. The individual would be sacked and labelled a disgrace, and rightly so.\r\n\r\nDianne Abbotts comments were ignorant, whether she has been somehow taken out of context (and it is difficult to see how this could happen) or not, the blunder is enough to have a bi election called.\r\n\r\nIn recent times:\r\n\r\n-Ann Winterton was sacked for telling a racist joke and rightly so.\r\n-Labour have called for Aidan Burley to be gotten rid of for attending a party with 'potential' nazi themed fancy dress.\r\n\r\nYet Dianne abbott is given 'a severe dressing down'.\r\n\r\nIf she doesn't resign she should be sacked, as she should not be in a position of trust as an MP and clearly cannot represent the views of the country or her constituents any longer.","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-01-05T13:16:22.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:47.303Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:17.071Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-05T13:16:22.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":38621,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/38621.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Keeping seas free of harmful waste","background":null,"additional_details":"Every year thousands of tons of waste is dumped by large sewage companies off the shores of Great Britain; harming our sealife and destroying the beautiful beaches that we all enjoy. This is something that has been talked about but little action has been taken. Pressure groups like Surfers Against Sewage have been battling for many years against dangerous waste and sewage being dumped close to our shores. This is something that should be taken more seriously and needs review.\r\n\r\nKeep are beaches clean\r\n\r\nTom Straughan ","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-09-13T14:20:29.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:25.266Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:39:23.483Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-09-13T14:20:29.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":68851,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/68851.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"We, the undersigned, support the policy of UKIP Crewe and Nantwich to halt any further development of the green gaps/green belt in Crewe and Nantwich","background":null,"additional_details":"We, the undersigned, support the policy of UKIP Crewe and Nantwich to halt any further development of the green gaps/green belt in Crewe and Nantwich.\r\n ","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2014-08-25T12:33:12.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:11.884Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:45:00.691Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-08-25T12:33:12.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"no-action","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":1497,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/1497.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Campaigrally against evening and weekend parking fees in London","background":null,"additional_details":"I feel the government/local government are taking us all for idiots and believe it is now time for us to stand up against them. We are experiencing cuts left, right and centre with no increase in pay but plenty in expenses. We are in a recession, the businesses need money and the government are making it hard for people to get to the shops. Travelling at weekends are usually off due to railway repairs, it seems then ridiculous to charge for parking.\r\nDavid Cameron talks about ‘The Big Society’...but again in his society the only ones giving are us,whilst the government continues to take. We can only give so much...unfortunately I feel this country has given too much and now it is time to start getting something back!\r\n\r\nWe want you to stop this new policy of charging for parking fees evenings and weekends in london.\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2011-08-04T10:39:24.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:26:25.497Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:32:35.350Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-08-04T10:39:24.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":"This is a responsibility of Transport for London and the Mayor."},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":26813,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/26813.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Diane Abbott should be required to resign immediately","background":null,"additional_details":"Although the racism cards are being seriously overplayed, they must necessarily apply equally.  If someone had made a similar comment about black people they would be seriously dealt with.  As an MP, Diane Abbott has an obligation to be even more circumspect in what she says than most.  If she is not required to resign it will just reinforce what is a widely held belief amongst so many of the indigenous people of this country - namely that the racist laws apply only to protect ethnic minorities.  There is serious resentment already that the racial equality laws do not apply equally to the white population of this country.  If Diane Abbott is allowed to escape any penalty by just apologising, how does this make it any better than being told that footballers should just shake hands when a racist comment is made? This is not just a matter for the labour party, this is an issue that goes to the heart of government.  An MP is not above the law,","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-01-05T18:58:37.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:47.392Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:17.448Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-05T18:58:37.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"irrelevant","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":28706,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/28706.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"a knight hood for kenny dalglish","background":null,"additional_details":"for his services to liverpool and liverpool football club","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2012-01-31T00:13:19.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:53.211Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:37:35.508Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-31T00:13:19.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"honours","details":null},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":68574,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/68574.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"we want a voice","background":null,"additional_details":"The aim of our campaign is to get 10 young people from all around England to meet with politicians in the House of Commons once a month in order to debate issues concerning young people.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":1,"created_at":"2014-08-13T21:22:06.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:10.893Z","rejected_at":"2017-06-21T12:44:57.913Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-08-13T21:22:06.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":"Please see e-petition created by Zak Green, closing on 21/11/2014\r\n\r\n''There should be a young group, aged 14+ to be selected from their schools to form a group that can meet with the government on a regular basis to discuss matters that are close to them. Surely we can't deny young people beginning to understand the government and it's decisions?''"},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}}]}