{"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=259&parliament=2&state=all","first":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?state=all","last":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=1219&state=all","next":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=260&state=all","prev":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=258&state=all"},"data":[{"type":"archived-petition","id":55221,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/55221.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"'Super Society Raffle' - an economic Initiative","background":null,"additional_details":"In a direct response to the tough economic climate faced by consumers and businesses alike, the introduction of a 'Super Society Raffle' will generate much needed disposable income back into our LOCAL economies. The SSR aims to be established as a non-profit regional based organisation designed to award multiple £5000 cash prizes, it will also donate substantial funds to good causes in each region in line with commission guidelines. Rules regarding 'large society lotteries' would currently not support the operation of such a scheme, this petition will endeavour to convince our Government to enact 'unique' legislation authorising its existence. It is worth remembering the 'UK National Lottery' was established in this manner.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2013-09-24T21:50:29.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:24.488Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-10-08T10:37:36.000Z","closed_at":"2014-10-08T10:37:36.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-09-24T21:50:29.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":31195,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/31195.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Social Workers should be regulated as strictly as doctors","background":null,"additional_details":"Social Workers are not held accountable, nor are given strict guideleines about all aspects of their workings practices.  This needs to change before more children needing care are missed, and children being removed into care that needn't have happened.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-03-10T22:21:44.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:01.285Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-03-14T14:46:07.000Z","closed_at":"2013-03-14T14:46:07.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-03-10T22:21:44.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54160,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54160.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Multi-buy Offers","background":null,"additional_details":"Ban special offers involving multi-buy on perishable goods.\r\n\r\nIf a company wants to promote a certain perishable item then they can reduce the price of a single item instead.\r\n\r\nThis will help reduce food waste. And allow single people or the elderly to buy what is needed at a special price rather than buy too much and later throw some away or just go without.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2013-08-23T22:35:18.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:20.807Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-08-27T08:27:18.000Z","closed_at":"2014-08-27T08:27:18.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-08-23T22:35:18.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":53373,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/53373.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Cap Vet Prescription Charges","background":null,"additional_details":"Since vets were allowed to charge for prescriptions from November 2008, charges have continued to escalate. While it is only right that vets should make a charge for the time taken to prepare the prescription, many feel that the charge is totally disproportionate to the time involved.\r\n\r\nI am therefore calling for a national cap to be introduced for veterinary prescriptions, to legally enforce an upper limit for such charges.\r\n\r\nI am not going to propose the value of the cap, but perhaps it should be commensurate with the cost of a doctor's prescription in England.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2013-08-01T19:45:28.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:18.125Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-08-12T15:29:02.000Z","closed_at":"2014-08-12T15:29:02.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-08-01T19:45:28.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":23426,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/23426.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Cap Car Insurance Premiums and Payouts to help the \"Big Society\"","background":null,"additional_details":"Car insurance prices are becoming a joke, mainly due to the blame-claim society we live in. I propose the Government take action by placing a cap on the premium payable by the customer dependant on age and power output of the vehicle they wish to drive. Likewise I also propose they place a cap on the payouts received by people involved in minor motoring accidents so that it is proportionate to the injury and inconvenience suffered. If more people could afford to own and run a car the government would make more income via Road Tax and Fuel Duty thus hopefully reducing fuel prices and improving road infrastructure and also more people would be able to apply for jobs further away from home thus reducing the number of unemployed relying on state benefit. The benefits to society by not pricing people out of motoring could be endless.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2011-11-20T19:55:52.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:37.124Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-11-21T13:34:35.000Z","closed_at":"2012-11-21T13:34:35.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-11-20T19:55:52.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":53037,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/53037.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Lindisfarne Gospels to stay in Durham","background":null,"additional_details":"The Lindisfarne Gospels are a key part of the north east's religious and cultural history.  Following this summer's successful temporary return to Durham, the government should ensure the British Museum takes immediate action to permanently return the Gospels to their rightful home in Durham, under the guardianship of the University of Durham and Durham Cathedral.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2013-07-24T08:13:45.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:16.935Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-07-24T10:26:58.000Z","closed_at":"2014-07-24T10:26:58.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-07-24T08:13:45.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":52891,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/52891.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop car insurance postcode lottery","background":null,"additional_details":"When booking car insurance, the premium can increase by up to 400% just for a change in the postcode of the policy holder even for third party insurance which is independent of the home of the policy holder. I believe this is plain discrimination against people leaving in certain post codes. For instance, if a person moves from post code A to B, the insurance cost can increase from £1000 to £5000 even for a car worth less than £1000. This cannot be right as it is still the same person with the same driving skills and habits. The insurance should be based on the risks posed by the policy holder to other road users and a small increase in premium (proportional to the cost of the car) if the policy include fire and theft or is comprehensive.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2013-07-19T21:20:06.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:16.338Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-07-22T08:33:43.000Z","closed_at":"2014-07-22T08:33:43.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-07-19T21:20:06.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":52040,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/52040.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Fair and public hearings for Harassment and related complaints","background":null,"additional_details":"The UK Government is taking steps to reform ASBOs so that their issue is considered by the civil courts. This may ensure a fair and public hearing for the person they may be issued on and the people who want them issued.\r\nAt present the police are issuing fixed penalties, cautions and harassment warnings for claims that may be tenuous against the recipient and not enough for the complainant, thus denying both their rights to a fair and public hearing under the Human Rights Act 1998.\r\nWe therefore call for the UK Government to review fixed penalties, harassment warnings and other cautions, as they have done with ASBOs, to provide a way for both complainants and recipients to have a fair and public hearing, as is their right under the Human Rights Act 1998. This may include making greater use of the civil courts or similar tribunals.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2013-06-25T10:17:42.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:13.479Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-07-08T14:16:35.000Z","closed_at":"2013-10-08T14:16:35.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-06-25T10:17:42.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":51806,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/51806.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Recycling compulsory free collection","background":null,"additional_details":"London schools; the majority of them do not offer recycling in schools due to cost. A Lot of them offer recycling bins but public schools do not have the money to pay for collection, therefore it all ends up in general waste.\r\nPlease take this in to acknowledgment; I hope that goverment will either make compulsory free collection or give the school a budget for collection.\r\nThis is important because a huge amount of paper waste comes from schools.\r\nThankyou Imogen\r\nimmy_099@hotmail.com","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2013-06-18T19:25:40.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:12.752Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-06-20T08:55:38.000Z","closed_at":"2014-06-20T08:55:38.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-06-18T19:25:40.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":51641,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/51641.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"prescription fee fairness","background":null,"additional_details":"There needs to be fairness in prescription charges, who determines a price on a persons health? should a recovering heroine addict get free methadone, yet a depressed person has to pay for the vital medication to keep them from suicide.... The current legislation is far from equal, a person in Wales gets all prescription medication free, yet cross the bridge into England, if a person doesn't meet the right criteria then they have to pay for their medication. No one is prescribed medication without a real need for it to live a healthy life, is this fair? No it isn't. the NHS would obviously suffer if all prescription were free... so maybe there should be a fee for everyone, at a much lower rate, therefore creating fairness and equality, without the NHS suffering.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2013-06-14T09:15:12.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:12.185Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-06-17T09:53:47.000Z","closed_at":"2014-06-17T09:53:47.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-06-14T09:15:12.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":51435,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/51435.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Support an international investigation into war crimes and other human rights abuses committed in Sri Lanka","background":null,"additional_details":"Both the Sri Lankan government and the opposition Tamil Tigers reportedly committed war crimes, crimes against humanity and human rights abuses during the war in Sri Lanka. The Sri Lankan government has a poor record of effectively investigating violations by its forces, as documented by Amnesty International. An international investigation into the crimes and abuses committed by both sides during the war is needed if the victims are to receive justice. The UK government should publicly support such an international investigation as a first step toward achieving accountability in Sri Lanka for these crimes and abuses.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2013-06-09T12:14:23.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:11.566Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-06-11T09:18:06.000Z","closed_at":"2013-12-11T10:18:06.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-06-09T12:14:23.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":50846,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/50846.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"stop Dog Fighting Within the U.K","background":null,"additional_details":"to stop dog fight's within the U.K. Would like the Government to combat and bring to book the People responsible that commit this violent and cruel crime against dog's. To use technology and other uses to hand to track down the people responsible. This is a violent and cruel crime.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2013-05-26T10:04:13.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:09.482Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-05-29T10:42:37.000Z","closed_at":"2013-11-29T11:42:37.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-05-26T10:04:13.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":50744,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/50744.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Address the \"performance gap\" in low carbon buildings before setting higher performance standards.","background":null,"additional_details":"The Department for Communities and Local Government have released grant funding for the Designed vs As-Built project.\r\n\r\nThe project sets out to steadily close the \"Performance gap\" between design performance in buildings and actual performance. The target of the project is to ensure that 90% of the new low carbon homes built in the UK perform to meet or exceed there design target by 2020.\r\n\r\nDCLG's roadmap to zero carbon is still targeted to 2016, 4 years before this problem is set to be resolved.\r\n\r\nThis petition is asking the DCLG to focus more towards these performance gap issues. This is in preference to setting the bar higher, just to see more developments miss there own performance targets by a greater degree.\r\n\r\nIdentifying the cause of these performance problems will become impossible nearer the zero carbon standard.\r\n\r\nNew developments built between now and 2020 will be an unacceptable waste. Please address the performance gap in new buildings before aiming for zero carbon.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2013-05-24T16:09:10.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:09.155Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-06-14T13:02:04.000Z","closed_at":"2014-06-14T13:02:04.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-05-24T16:09:10.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":44691,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/44691.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Royal institution","background":null,"additional_details":"Prevent the sale of the historic buildingbthat houses the Royal Institution and keep this important heritage for the nation.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2013-01-19T16:40:16.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:48.877Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-01-23T11:11:18.000Z","closed_at":"2014-01-23T11:11:18.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-01-19T16:40:16.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":44292,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/44292.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Ensure the welfare of the Cow","background":null,"additional_details":"The sad truth is many of our bovine friends around Europe are not happy cows, with standards of animal welfare varying greatly across the EU. But we can do something about it & to do this, we need your help!\r\n\r\nHow can we help the cows I hear you say!? Well, as there is currently no specific legislation covering the welfare of Europe’s 23 million dairy cows, as there is for pigs and hens, we want to call for the UK government to help make Europe’s cows happier.\r\n\r\nWe want all our Europe’s cows to be happy by lobbying for a specific European Directive for dairy cow welfare. Please show the cows some love.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2013-01-11T18:37:35.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:47.581Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-01-14T09:14:35.000Z","closed_at":"2014-01-14T09:14:35.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-01-11T18:37:35.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":44010,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/44010.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Tax Breaks for Companies that bring Call Centres back to the UK","background":null,"additional_details":"Allow tax breaks for companies that bring their call centres back to the UK to creat jobs","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2013-01-05T22:48:38.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:46.574Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-01-07T09:32:48.000Z","closed_at":"2014-01-07T09:32:48.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-01-05T22:48:38.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":43876,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/43876.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Enforce Adequately A Ban on the Consumption of Alcohol on the Transpennine Ale-Trail Route","background":null,"additional_details":"Approximately 45,000 so-called \"ale-trailers\" enter into villages between Batley and Stalybridge each year with around 2000 visiting these small villages along the way on Saturdays in the summer months. Alcohol is \"freely\" consumed at many of these unmanned stations causing groups of people to  urinate on platforms, urinate in the corridors of trains, trespass on Network Rail land and generally cause anti-social behaviour. Marsden and Slaithwaite are un-manned stations and it is only a matter of time before one of these \"ale-trailers\" (usually on a stag or hen do - intoxicated before 2pm in the afternoon) goes under a train.\r\nPlease \"enforce\" adequately a ban on consuming alcohol on the platform and on the train itself on this line for the safety of \"all\" using (or trying to use) this service.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2013-01-02T15:53:32.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:46.136Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-01-07T10:18:26.000Z","closed_at":"2014-01-07T10:18:26.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-01-02T15:53:32.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":43861,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/43861.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"MP's should only do one job and not be allowed to do any other works whilst working as an MP","background":null,"additional_details":"MP's should only do one job and not be allowed to do any other works whilst working as an MP. They are voted in as an MP and should only be allowed to do one job only.\r\n\r\nThe voters are getting fed up with watching MP's make a small fortune whilst us the hard workers get nothing. Its time for change and the MP's must follow what the people want. We the people want a proper public vote on this.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2013-01-02T11:24:42.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:46.075Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-01-03T10:52:25.000Z","closed_at":"2014-01-03T10:52:25.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-01-02T11:24:42.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":43851,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/43851.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Mandatory neutering of pets","background":null,"additional_details":"The mandatory neutering of all pets either before pets are sold or within a 6 month time period, to help prevent unwanted litters and abandoned animals.\r\nOnly registered breeders and animal charities to be allowed to sell animals, subject to limits and the reporting of all animals sold.\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2013-01-01T16:45:48.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:46.043Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-01-03T07:40:08.000Z","closed_at":"2014-01-03T07:40:08.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-01-01T16:45:48.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":42695,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/42695.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Create National Disability Vehicle Fuel Duty Capping/Subsidised Benefit Scheme!.","background":null,"additional_details":"Create National Disability Vehicle Fuel Duty Capping/Subsidised Benefit Scheme, for disabled drivers and passengers plus families in the UK.\r\n\r\nWe are asking the Treasury Ministers and the Coalition Government, plus Select Committee’s for Treasury and Transport, to review increasing vehicle fuel and they are disadvantaging disabled people especially and unfairly to others in society.\r\n\r\nAlso ask for a free MP’s debate in the House of Common’s, over Create National Disability Vehicle Fuel Duty Capping/Subsidised Benefit Scheme too.\r\n\r\nPLEASE EVERYONE SIGN UP TO THIS E-PETITION, TO SUPPORT DISABLED PEOPLE. ALSO INFORM OTHERS ABOUT THIS TOO, THANK YOU CONARD, WENDY & DAVID DMFed","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-12-02T23:35:48.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:38.424Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-12-03T08:08:29.000Z","closed_at":"2013-12-03T08:08:29.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-12-02T23:35:48.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":42487,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/42487.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Scrap 1p's and 2p's- Boost Economy.","background":null,"additional_details":"If we scrap 1p's and 2p's then companies cant sell an item for example £9.99. This would mean the company would make an extra penny. The average to below person most probably wouldnt miss the penny. The amount of transactions companies in the UK do everyday with an extra penny would add to millions I believe. Therefore boosting profits economy, growth and hopefully employment. Also you dont have annoying copper. #killoffcopper","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-11-29T10:25:54.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:37.697Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-11-30T08:30:41.000Z","closed_at":"2013-11-30T08:30:41.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-11-29T10:25:54.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":42468,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/42468.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"create a new law to stop cyberbullying","background":null,"additional_details":"For our citizenship campaign we have decided to start a petition to get a new law made to stop cyberbullying. We want harsher punishment for the Cyberbullies and more support for the victims. We want the police to have more training in how to deal with cyberbullying and teachers allowed  the ability to deal with it at school.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-11-28T19:28:39.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:37.643Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-12-03T15:37:29.000Z","closed_at":"2013-03-03T15:37:29.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-11-28T19:28:39.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":41851,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/41851.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Freeze Fuel Prices / Taxation for 4 years","background":null,"additional_details":"We, the public of the UK, would like a 4-year freeze on increase in price / taxation of Petrol and Diesel Fuel.\r\n\r\nDue to the rise in inflation, which is not inline with wages, we the motorist's (Public) of the UK would like you to consider a freeze in the rise of fuel / Taxation for 4 years. If a freeze is not feasible, we request a drop in prices.\r\n\r\nOur current fuel prices are £1.339 per litre for Petrol (average) and £1.399 per litre for Diesel (average), whereas in the USA - they currently charge the equivalent of £0.586 per litre of fuel, that is $0.928 per litre of Petrol. We are nearly 3 times the amount USA charge their motorists to fill up their vehicles.\r\n\r\nMore details on fuel prices throughout Europe and USA can be found here:\r\nhttp://www.fuel-prices-europe.info/\r\n\r\nInformation stated in this e-petition is correct as of 15th November 2012.\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-11-15T20:43:37.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:35.859Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-11-16T08:56:25.000Z","closed_at":"2013-11-16T08:56:25.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-11-15T20:43:37.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":41747,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/41747.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Review ESA eligibility criteria and only allow medical professionals to make the final decision.","background":null,"additional_details":"The Criteria for ESA eligibility should be reviewed and changed as they are too broad and are inappropriate for many illnesses and conditions.\r\n\r\nAlso, the final decisions are not made by medical professions so they do not have the knowledge of illnesses and conditions that is required to assess peoples capabilities and therefore eligiblility.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-11-14T11:45:42.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:35.585Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-11-14T12:35:53.000Z","closed_at":"2013-11-14T12:35:53.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-11-14T11:45:42.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":41705,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/41705.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Publicise the HMGovernment petitions website","background":null,"additional_details":"A petition to improve the public awareness of this website so as to improve the quality and accuracy of these petitions.\r\n\r\nEveryone should have the right to sign any of the petitions on this website easily and effectively. The creation of a login system so that people don't have to regularly go to their emails in order to sign multiple petitons woul be useful.\r\n\r\nAdvertising could be improved also, so that people know that they have this posibility of a positive and active say in what their government is doing. ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-11-13T19:39:16.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:35.504Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-11-19T09:44:21.000Z","closed_at":"2013-11-19T09:44:21.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-11-13T19:39:16.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":41494,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/41494.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"DVLA should not be above the law and be allowed to be corrupt.","background":null,"additional_details":"If a justified criminal complaint of corruption is made against the DVLA to the South Wales Police, which is responsible for policing Swansea where the DVLA is based, the South Wales Police say they do not consider such complaints against the DVLA, and so imply that the DVLA is above the law and is allowed to be corrupt.\r\nThe DVLA is currently a criminal organisation which can and does corruptly lie about someone having a medical condition and so revoke that person's driving licence, and can do so with impunity as they are currently above the law.\r\nThe DVLA should not be above the law and be allowed to be corrupt.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-11-10T18:35:58.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:34.961Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-11-12T08:56:20.000Z","closed_at":"2013-11-12T08:56:20.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-11-10T18:35:58.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":41195,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/41195.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Foreign aid referendum - budget allocation review","background":null,"additional_details":"The arbitrary target 0.7% GDP was decided by the UN and not the British people. In 2008, the british contribution was 0.48%, whilst the US and Japan only 0.2%\r\n\r\nSuch a major budget decision, especially in such economic times should be allowed for the people to vote and not have to wait for policy & manifestos in next round of elections.\r\n\r\nA referendum should be called to allow for cross party discussion and to allow THE PEOPLE TO DECIDE.\r\n\r\nA) Increase to 1% of GDP (same as Sweden)\r\nB) Increase to 0.7% (UN target)\r\nB) Revert to 0.45% (average country contribution)\r\nC) Reduce to 0.2% (same as US & Japan)\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-11-04T13:47:49.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:33.984Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-11-06T15:21:46.000Z","closed_at":"2013-05-06T14:21:46.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-11-04T13:47:49.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":41160,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/41160.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"The CSA fails to promote responsible parenting.","background":null,"additional_details":"CSA law says that a Non Resident Parent receives a 1/7th reduction per night a child spends with them.\r\n\r\nI petition to increase the nightly rate from 1/7th to 2/7ths.\r\n\r\nCurrently, if a NRP has a child overnight for 3 nights a week (almost half) they still have to pay 4/7ths of the assessment to the PWC. Why? The PWC has no legal duty to provide footwear, clothing, anything, for overnight stays. The NRP still has to provide bedding, clothing etc. Equal shared care should mean no payment either way. Changing the 1/7th per night reduction to 2/7ths, almost addresses this.\r\n\r\nThe Government want to charge for using the CSA. Why deal with the symptoms of having an unfair system - address the causes.  They should encourage NRP's (95.2% dads), to be involved in their childrens lives. Currently, It is cheaper for a NRP to send a check in the post than be involved in the childs life.\r\n\r\nThis is morally wrong. End absent parenting and increased child support evasion due to an unfair system.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-11-03T11:20:11.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:33.855Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-11-05T10:48:30.000Z","closed_at":"2013-11-05T10:48:30.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-11-03T11:20:11.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":41064,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/41064.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Abolish paper tax disks","background":null,"additional_details":"I would like the government to stop producing tax disks and stop requiring the display of tax disks.\r\n\r\nAccording to an FOI request made by Mr Worsdall: \"The average cost of producing a tax disc for 2010-11 was £1.27. This includes the cost of producing and issuing a renewal reminder for a tax disc or SORN (V11 reminder) which is part of the relicensing process and the cost of posting the tax disc where applicable.\"\r\n\r\nThis to me is a complete waste of money, we don't need tax disks, as all the data is on DVLA computers and is available to law enforcement.\r\n\r\nWe don't have a insurance disk to show we have insurance, therefore we also don't need tax disks to show we have tax.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-10-31T20:05:41.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:33.496Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-11-01T12:48:56.000Z","closed_at":"2013-11-01T12:48:56.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-10-31T20:05:41.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":41040,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/41040.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop False Allegations","background":null,"additional_details":"Change the law to ensure false allegations of sexual abuse do not make it to trial.\r\n\r\nEncourage the UK to change the law as per a number of European countries.\r\n\r\nBring in lie detectors, imprisonment for false accusers and stop any sort of compensation.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-10-31T08:45:31.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:33.400Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-11-14T11:27:11.000Z","closed_at":"2013-11-14T11:27:11.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-10-31T08:45:31.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":41019,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/41019.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Royal Mail Delivery to Neighbour scheme","background":null,"additional_details":"This month the Post Office introduced a scheme whereby most post, which could not be put through residential letterboxes, will be delivered to a neighbour of the postman's choice, unless a sticker is displayed preventing this. This change was inadequately researched and poorly publicised but was implemented nonetheless. There is a real risk of lost post. I petition Parliament to cancel this scheme and revert to the previous delivery arrangements.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-10-30T15:11:41.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:33.345Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-10-31T14:44:51.000Z","closed_at":"2013-10-31T14:44:51.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-10-30T15:11:41.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":40620,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/40620.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"child advocacy to be a right of every child facing protection issues or in need","background":null,"additional_details":"Currently each Local Authority has to have child advocacy provision. However a social worker or anyone with parental responsibility can prevent a child accessing services without a court order in some circumstances. It is also reliant on what contract is in place with the Local Authority.\r\nThe welfare of the child is paramount. So the law needs changing to ensure every child that is identified as in need, on protection plan, looked after or with a disability get automatic right to be heard. That no adult except the advocacy services themselves decide if it is viable and right for a child.\r\nThis to uphold the human rights articles for children to ensure their views are heard and promoted at every level.\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-10-21T19:09:03.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:32.024Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-11-08T09:25:01.000Z","closed_at":"2013-11-08T09:25:01.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-10-21T19:09:03.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":40505,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/40505.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"MPs duty bound / forced to reveal they rent Tax Payer funded homes.","background":null,"additional_details":"Members of the House of Commons, current and former ministers, who claim expenses for Rent when already receiving rent from properties that they own in London, or have purchased, improved, furnished with taxpayer assistance.\r\nMust be stopped, exposed, and rules changed that prevents, does not allow this to happen.\r\n\r\nIf they own a property in London they should use it for their parliamentary office and not claim tax payers money, expenses for another home.\r\n\r\nThis is happening now and has been for years. The loopholes that allow this must be Closed.\r\n\r\nWhere property portfolios can be built up at Tax Payers expense and must be stopped.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-10-19T07:53:21.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:31.679Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-10-23T09:00:56.000Z","closed_at":"2013-10-23T09:00:56.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-10-19T07:53:21.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":40372,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/40372.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Fairness for Student Part Time Workers","background":null,"additional_details":"Students are currently having a tough time raising funds and preparing themselves for the financial difficulties that universities and modern consumerism brings. This is why it is important that students are able to have part time work outside of their studies. However the current conditions of work, especially applying for part time jobs are incredibly unfair. The greatest trouble is businesses not accepting or even reading applications for those who do not have experience in the career. However, a student cannot gain experience if they are not accepted, which results in a vicious cycle that severely affects the wellbeing of the person. Worse still, a business rarely responds to an appication by stating that they have not obtained the job. This is the benefit of modern business. I would wish for Parliament to discuss legislation to provide part time students with fairer conditions for applying for jobs.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-10-16T19:04:59.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:31.215Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-10-18T08:04:51.000Z","closed_at":"2013-10-18T08:04:51.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-10-16T19:04:59.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":40294,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/40294.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop the CO-OP opening a large store in Lenham Maidstone","background":null,"additional_details":"The Co-operative are currently trying to acquire the Lenham Hardware site just off the square to build a large retail convenience store.\r\n\r\nThis will be detrimental to the village, it will not bring anything new or anything needed that we do not already have. It will put a lot of strain on the current retailers and jeopardise the future of the village life as it is known now.\r\n\r\nPlease help us stop Co-op or any other large retail group using the site and put the site back into the hands of people from the village to help the local economy instead of putting it at risk.\r\n\r\nAll support is greatly needed.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-10-15T11:38:42.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:30.956Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-10-16T13:08:11.000Z","closed_at":"2013-04-16T13:08:11.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-10-15T11:38:42.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":39893,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/39893.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"HM Queen Elizabeth 2nd Silver Jubilee Criteria","background":null,"additional_details":"We the undersign ask that the same criteria for the award of the Golden & Diamond Jubilee Medals be extended to the Queen Elizabeth 2nd Silver Jubilee medal","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-10-06T17:43:59.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:29.606Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-10-12T12:00:49.000Z","closed_at":"2013-10-12T12:00:49.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-10-06T17:43:59.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":39891,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/39891.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Reconsider the Schengen Area","background":null,"additional_details":"We wish for the UK to reconsider the opt-out of the Schengen Area. The fact that a separate visa is required to visit the UK prevents many tourists, particularly those from China, from touring this country. France currently hosts 30% more tourists than the UK, with roughly 700,000 Chinese tourists compared to our 140,000.\r\n\r\nThis move, we feel, would help boost our economy in a time of recession, as well as allowing UK nationals a more streamlined process when travelling.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-10-06T17:41:37.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:29.598Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-10-15T13:58:59.000Z","closed_at":"2013-10-15T13:58:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-10-06T17:41:37.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":39653,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/39653.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Ban On All Car Park Charges In Britain","background":null,"additional_details":"I just think car park charges are a nuisance and we should go back to the day there wasn't any car park charges anywhere.\r\n\r\nSome of my family members had to go back home just to get the right change for the pay and display meters.  My dad used to go to the town centre loads of times but now hardly ever since they brought in the parking charges.\r\n\r\nPlease ban car park charges everywhere in britain as it is a burdon on drivers everyday.  ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-10-02T21:48:31.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:28.745Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-10-03T07:53:40.000Z","closed_at":"2013-10-03T07:53:40.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-10-02T21:48:31.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":39519,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/39519.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Provide a smoking area at UK Airport","background":null,"additional_details":"As we all know we live in a \"smoke-free\" UK, which is fine and not unreasonable for everyday life.\r\nHowever when faced with a long flight ahead of you, there should be some provision made for smokers again in our UK airports.\r\nI'm not talking a fancy area but a smoking room or small outside space like most other international airports would be fine, just somewhere to have a smoke once air-side.\r\nI was recently waiting to board a flight at Heathrow and was chatting to a young New Zealander who was a transit passenger having just had a ten hour flight and was waiting to board another ten hour flight and found it unbelievable that there was nowhere to smoke at all in the entire airport.\r\nWe are not asking for much, surely is this not against our human rights? If alcohol is readily available and can be drunk at numerous outlets air-side then smoking should be allowed as well.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-09-29T13:10:01.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:28.257Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-10-01T08:29:27.000Z","closed_at":"2013-10-01T08:29:27.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-09-29T13:10:01.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":21426,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/21426.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"E-book readers and e-books should be zero rated for VAT for the deaf-blind/visually impaired","background":null,"additional_details":"The deaf and hard of hearing can read a printed book of any print size, a visually impaired person can sometimes read a book of normal print size with the aid of a magnifier (but that is not always the most comfortable of options), a large print book (where available) or they can listen to audio books (where available).  For the deaf-blind it starts to get a little more tricky.\r\n\r\nE-book readers and e-nooks are classed as a luxury for those with good vision and rightly so, the person with good vision has the choice of how to read a certain piece of literature however to the deaf-blind and visually impaired e-books are one of the most fantastic inventions and should not be classed as a luxury - they are an essential part of everyday living as it is not just books that can be purchased but also newspapers and magazines.\r\n\r\nThese should be zero rated for VAT for these people.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2011-11-03T14:01:24.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:30.496Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-11-07T08:45:03.000Z","closed_at":"2012-05-07T07:45:03.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-11-03T14:01:24.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":39150,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/39150.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Police should show more respect for cyclists","background":null,"additional_details":"One factor which contributes to the low level of cycling in the UK is the attitude of the police to cyclists. Too often cyclists are regarded as a nuisance who do not deserve to use the road. The recent incident in which the Chief Whip was required by the police to dismount and wheel his bicycle through the pedestrian gate on leaving Downing Street exemplifies this attitude.\r\n\r\nWe call on the Home Office to encourage the police to recognise that cyclists are vulnerable road users who deserve at least as much respect as other road users.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-09-21T12:27:06.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:27.064Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-09-25T11:05:35.000Z","closed_at":"2013-09-25T11:05:35.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-09-21T12:27:06.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":38868,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/38868.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Reduce domestic supply voltage to 230v","background":null,"additional_details":"The European Community domestic supply voltage is 230 volts. All appliances are rat for 230volts.  It is not necessary to supply at 240voltd.  Domestic power supply companies in the UK produce 240v  {plus or minus 10%}. If the national grid and power supply companies were to supply at 230 volts every household in the country would receive 8% less domestic bills. The subsequent drop in supply would increase the resilience of the UK supply network therefore reducing our dependence on costly fossil fuels.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-09-17T19:24:18.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:26.113Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-09-18T12:41:15.000Z","closed_at":"2013-09-18T12:41:15.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-09-17T19:24:18.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":38315,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/38315.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop the Proposed relaxation of Planning Permission laws","background":null,"additional_details":"Please reject the the proposed relaxing of planning laws simply to boost work for the construction industry and allow further spoiling of the countryside with unnecessary developments on green fields and in peoples back gardens.  ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-09-07T09:13:43.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:24.207Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-10-02T07:38:15.000Z","closed_at":"2013-01-02T08:38:15.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-09-07T09:13:43.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":38177,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/38177.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Illegalize khat","background":null,"additional_details":"Khat is a stimulant drug with effects similar to amphetamine.Chewing it makes people feel more alert and talkative and suppresses the appetite, though users describe an ensuing calming effect when used over a few hours. Regular use may lead to insomnia (inability to sleep), anorexia and anxiety. In some cases it may make people feel more irritable and angry and possibly violent. Psychological dependence can result from regular use so that users feel depressed and low unless they keep taking it.\r\n\r\nKhat is illegal in Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland and many other countries, please support this petition to make it illegal in the UK. This drug is used a lot in some middle eastern countries and among other things does cause aggressiveness and should be banned, for the safety of our society.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-09-04T21:58:04.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:23.826Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-09-05T11:55:03.000Z","closed_at":"2013-06-05T11:55:03.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-09-04T21:58:04.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":37816,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/37816.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Lancashire County New Names","background":null,"additional_details":"This petion proposes that the historic county name, Lancashire, be used to re-name firstly, Greater Manchester to South East Lancashire and secondly Merseyside to South West Lancashire. The duties and responsibilities of the counties would remain as is in current operation, This would be a simple name change only and would be similar to the county names of Yorkshire.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-08-27T15:01:32.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:22.673Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-09-13T10:43:20.000Z","closed_at":"2013-09-13T10:43:20.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-08-27T15:01:32.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":37835,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/37835.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Proposed changes to widowed parents allowance Aug 12","background":null,"additional_details":"I oppose the changes to WPA proposed recently by Lord Freud. This would increase the amount paid to widows with children during the first year to £9,800, and thereafter all payments would cease.  At the moment, widows with children receive a one-off payment of £2,000 and subsequently around £5,000 every year while their children grow up.  These changes  mean that a widow who loses their husband/wife when their child is only a year old will ultimately lose up to £80,000 while their child is growing up.\r\nThis will place an enormous additional burden on widowed parents and subsequently disadvantage their children. ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-08-27T22:23:05.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:22.744Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-09-03T08:57:45.000Z","closed_at":"2012-12-03T09:57:45.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-08-27T22:23:05.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":66419,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/66419.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Change the law on givin parental responsibility to those on birth certificates","background":null,"additional_details":"To change the law bdothan that an absent parent or any parent who is not main carer should not just be allowed parental responsibility because they are named on a birth certificate. My ex partner has been given everything he has asked for since deciding to want 'contact' after 4 years of being absent. The reason for this, because he split from his other partner and his visitation with his other child has been decreased. I name him on the birth certificate for my child not him so that when my son asked I could give him the information. He is being forced to have contact against his will and is something that should not be tolerated ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2014-06-15T16:48:34.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:03.253Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-06-16T11:27:19.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-06-15T16:48:34.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":37589,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/37589.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"National trails to remain the responsibility of the national government","background":null,"additional_details":"The Government must retain responsibility for the thirteen National Trails rather than handing over responsibility to hard pressed local authorities and voluntary groups which will result in fragmented management and probable degradation of these fantastic resources which generate hundreds of millions of pounds per annum for local businesses and support many, many thousands of jobs within local economies, add health benefits to society in general and to the millions of people who walk these trails, not only British walkers but overseas visitors too who benefit the national economy by spending foreign currency on goods and services.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-08-23T10:04:21.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:21.892Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-08-23T13:17:56.000Z","closed_at":"2013-08-23T13:17:56.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-08-23T10:04:21.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":20558,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/20558.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"We DON'T want an in/out referendum on EU membership","background":null,"additional_details":"We the undersigned think Referenda are detrimental to the principles of representative democracy in this country and undermine the sovereignty of Parliament.\r\n\r\nThere may be a case for a referendum if there is a proposal for major constitutional change or at the time of a new EU treaty being proposed.\r\n\r\nHowever, spending millions of pounds of taxpayers money on a referndum about EU membership at the current time, when there are no major treaty changes proposed between the member states of the EU, would be a waste of money and time when the world is in economic crisis.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2011-10-27T15:32:10.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:27.680Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-10-31T11:14:40.000Z","closed_at":"2012-10-31T11:14:40.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-10-27T15:32:10.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":36318,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/36318.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Disclosure of financial terms in publically funded contracts","background":null,"additional_details":"Financial terms of any contract, agreement or settlement between a public body, local or national government office and a commercial organisation, involving the use of £100,000, or more of public funds (or the waiving of rights to income) should be placed in the public domain. The Government should introduce legislation to make such non-disclosure an offence and, in addition to penalties, offending persons/bodies/contractors shall be barred from seeking further contracts.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":13,"created_at":"2012-07-20T13:27:37.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:17.660Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-07-23T07:33:58.000Z","closed_at":"2013-07-23T07:33:58.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-07-20T13:27:37.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}}]}