{"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=290&parliament=2&state=all","first":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?state=all","last":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=1219&state=all","next":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=291&state=all","prev":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=289&state=all"},"data":[{"type":"archived-petition","id":73794,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/73794.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop GM-crops in the UK","background":null,"additional_details":"Once we start growing GM crops in the UK there is NO way back, they cross-contaminate other crops because GM pollen is effectively an invisible pollution that can reproduce. Canada can't grow organic oilseed rape anymore and Spain is losing its organic sweetcorn because all these crops have been contaminated. GM seeds are also patented, neighbouring farmers are being sued by the biotech companies if their seed stocks get contaminated with GM. This has led to many American farmers buying GM products simply because they can't afford the risk that their land might have picked up GM 'traits' from contamination. All I ask is that you at least educate yourself about GM crops and the risks and effects to environment AND human health. I recommend looking at: http://www.stopgm.org.uk/ and if you, like me don’t agree with GM crops in the UK and want the government to ensure it doesn't happen please sign this petition. ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2015-01-14T02:27:52.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:29.057Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2015-01-14T15:25:00.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2015-01-14T02:27:52.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":73332,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/73332.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"removal of sharia law courts/sharia comliance from uk","background":null,"additional_details":"We the undersigned wish Her Majesties Government to debate the removal of sharia compliance/courts from the U.K.\r\nSection 9: human rights act\r\npart 2:\r\n2 Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.\r\nThe U.K. Has specific laws for the protection of the rights of;\r\nwomen,\r\nL.G.B.T. people\r\nSharia law does not recognise these rights, therefore sharia compliance and sharia courts are circumnavigating both British and European laws.\r\nUnder clause 2 the protection of rights and freedoms of others supersedes religious beliefs.\r\nDue to sharia law NOT recognising equality of men with women, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, sharia becomes incompatible with U.K. Law, European law and western law and culture in general.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-12-29T10:24:31.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:27.510Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2015-01-16T11:25:04.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-12-29T10:24:31.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":72726,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/72726.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Remove New Censorship on Online Porn (Including Banning Female Ejaculation)","background":null,"additional_details":"The Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014 has banned the presentation of female ejaculation, and other acts, in all British-made on-demand pornography. The change especially targets acts that provide sexual pleasure for women, such as facesitting, and even goes as far as to ban the completely natural act of female ejaculation itself. BDSM and urolagnia have also been targeted, despite these being valid fetishes enjoyed by a minority of British people. Furthermore British-made porn now faces a severe threat, forcing the industry to leave the UK.\r\nThe government is banning this content for everybody to protect the under-18s, instead of restricting access to websites and improving the farce that is British sexual education. We call upon the government to repeal the unfair, sexist and ill-thought-out 'Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014'.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-12-03T19:36:59.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:25.642Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-12-04T15:52:20.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-12-03T19:36:59.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":71480,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/71480.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Medical Care 4 Recruits","background":null,"additional_details":"British army recruits do not get the nessacary medical care if they injure themselfs in training and more often than not are medically discharged as a result of this.\r\n\r\nYears ago when you joined the army that was that and you were only medically discharged if you could not perform as a solider.\r\nRecruits are now given just a few weeks to recover from their injury which with most training injurys is unrealistic\r\nMany recruits get medically discharged over trivial injures which could be treated otherwise\r\nbut because this uses time and money Recruits just get told to go home and get discharged\r\n\r\nThis is a moral injustice and a punch in the face to all the brave men and women who say goodbye to their families and join the army\r\n\r\nWe want recruits to receive full medical care for any injury that occurs during their training regardless of money or time\r\n\r\nPlease sign\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-10-29T22:51:50.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:21.292Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-10-30T11:13:00.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-10-29T22:51:50.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":71347,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/71347.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"reduce/remove deferral for gay blood donations","background":null,"additional_details":"All blood is tested before being given to a hospital patient.\r\nHIV and AIDS is no longer a gay only disease. Heterosexual people who are promiscuous have a higher chance of being HIV positive than monogamous gay couple, for example.\r\n\r\nOnly 4% of adults currently donate blood, but most of us would happily take the blood of we needed if.\r\n\r\nWhy cut out a whole demographic of potential donors...\r\n\r\nMore lives could be saved. There is no evedence to support that a 12 month deferral makes much difference.\r\n\r\nIf blood is tested before it is given to a patient, does it matter who donated it? Only safe blood would be give to a patient in need.\r\n\r\nThe 12 month deferral needs to be scrapped. ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-10-26T14:11:35.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:20.807Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-10-27T14:52:08.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-10-26T14:11:35.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":70755,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/70755.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop sale of URENCO and Eurostar","background":null,"additional_details":"Westminister doesn't have the right to sell public assets with out a public consultation. These assets are paid for by the British tax payers over many years and require parliment to listen to its share holders; we need to say what happens to these assets.\r\n\r\nThe Royal Mail was sold off at half its value and the same could happened to Eurostar. At present the value of our share is £20 billion, if we wait another 10 years the asset could be worth more. At present the company is making us money and the profits are being ploughed back into the state or the company. If a sell off is to happen, a British company or assets group should have priority.\r\n\r\nThe selling of URENCO would put our national security at risk. Having a forgien company to own our nuclear assets, could mean that other countries having access to uranium enrichment eg nuclear.\r\n\r\nNote If this petition is deleted it would indicate that the government already has a preferred buyer and is ignoring it's uk tax payers.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-10-13T07:47:18.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:18.673Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-10-16T08:51:15.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-10-13T07:47:18.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":70495,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/70495.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Introduce a 99p coin","background":null,"additional_details":"I am sick of paying £2 for something that costs £1.99 and getting that awkward 1p that sits at home forever. Making a 99p coin would get rid of the awkward exchange of loose change.\r\n\r\nObviously, the 1p coin would still be required in the event that someone would want to purchase an item from poundland using a 99p coin ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-10-07T21:37:31.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:17.811Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-10-08T07:01:01.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-10-07T21:37:31.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":69548,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/69548.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Expert debate/referendum for cannabis legalisation","background":null,"additional_details":"With Cannabis legalisation becoming a more heated debate, it is time that UK politicians finally except that the general public can have their say.\r\n\r\nIn the United states, many states have gone green with a multitude of positive effects following the change.  Although we are different from our friends in many ways, we can learn from the positive effects cannabis legalisation has had.\r\n\r\nOur NHS is crippled and the revenue produced from legalisation will inject billions of pounds into the system, more than enough money to cover any negative effects that the NHS may have may have to deal with.\r\n\r\nEducation and benefits for non smokers is the way to make people stop, not by criminalising them\r\n\r\nSo many uses and so overdue\r\n\r\nGIVE CHOICE, REDUCE CRIME, GO GREEN!","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-09-14T22:27:22.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:14.234Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-09-15T08:06:57.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-09-14T22:27:22.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":69492,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/69492.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Make sexual offence charging for women equal to that for men, accept female-to-male rape into law","background":null,"additional_details":"Currently in the United Kingdom a female cannot be convicted of raping a male under any circumstances. A female over the age of 16 who has sex with a male under the age of 16 is not charged with statutory rape, instead she can only be prosecuted for indecent assault.\r\nI believe that there are many circumstances in which a female can rape a male; if the male is attracted to the female sexually but asks her to stop for any other reasons and she refuses throughout intercourse, if a female drugs a male, and if a female sleeps with a minor.\r\nI am aware that male-to-female rape is far more common than female-to-male rape and that women have a much more difficult time in society than men do, however I believe that for the law to not accept that a woman can rape a man is ridiculous!\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-09-13T08:21:08.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:14.041Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-10-03T09:57:33.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-09-13T08:21:08.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":69366,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/69366.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Ban conspicuous religious symbols in public places","background":null,"additional_details":"In France, despite the majority religion being Roman Catholicism, the Church and the State are kept strictly apart. This includes the wearing of conspicuous religious symbols. In the UK, however, there are overlaps with religion and the public domain. This is wrong.\r\nOf course, we must allow freedom of religion, but the outward expression is seen by many as offensive and imposing. As a result, we call for all conspicuous religious symbols to be banned in public places, which incorporates any government-owned/controlled building. This includes:\r\n-government-funded schools, colleges and universities\r\n-shopping centres\r\n-government-funded parks etc.\r\nThe conspicuous religious symbols criteria includes:\r\n-conspicuous crucifixes\r\n-hijabs/burqas/niqabs/veils\r\n-elaborate turbans\r\n-yarmulkes\r\n\r\nWe demand for Britain to become secular in order to adapt to the modern era.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-09-09T23:08:29.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:13.607Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-09-11T17:07:43.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-09-09T23:08:29.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":69339,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/69339.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Children first, Dogs second","background":null,"additional_details":"Each year, 200,000 people are estimated to be bitten by dogs including 6,000 emergency hospital admissions for dog bites (around 100 savage dog attacks per week).\r\n\r\nIt has been estimated that up to 28,000 facial injuries are caused by dogs each year and a significant proportion of children are affected. This does not even include the impact of dogs creating fear and apprehension in others.\r\n\r\nAlong with the impact on lives, these injuries are an unnecessary economic burden on the health system.\r\n\r\nIt is therefore suggested that ALL dogs, regardless of breed should be muzzled (at the owners expense) outside of the home including in any environment in which they may escape into a public area.\r\n\r\nThe loss of 'little rovers' mandible freedom seems a fair exchange for the cost (financial, physical and psychological) of the damage being done to humans.\r\n\r\nThe petition asks the Department of Health to put Children first and Dogs second and seek legislation to ensure this happens.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-09-09T12:11:04.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:13.505Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-09-10T09:41:48.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-09-09T12:11:04.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":68685,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/68685.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"reduce length and duration of motorway roadworks","background":null,"additional_details":"The UK's motorways are constantly being improved - that's great.  However, on some roads drivers are limited to 50mph for far too long.  This is unsafe in terms of drivers losing concentration and drivers subsequently driving faster after the roadworks to try to make up lost time.  When there is mile after mile of a lower speed limit for no reason (work has not yet started, or has finished), this could encourage drivers to have less respect for speed restrictions.\r\n\r\nFurthermore, what is the cost to businesses which use these roads?  To what extent are the emergency services delayed leading to a loss of life due to these lengthy roadworks?\r\n\r\nWe are asking for legislation to limit the length of roadworks to 8 miles in a single stretch, and remove the restrictions as soon as possible once work is finished.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-08-18T20:53:07.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:11.328Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-08-20T07:34:20.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-08-18T20:53:07.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":73796,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/73796.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"stop winter fuel payments for people who live in hot countries","background":null,"additional_details":"Ex pats should NOTcontinue to receive winter fuel allowance, as it is NOT part of their pension rights. Payment SHOULD be determined by country of residence. Expats should not compare a supplement towards heating with child benefits payments or the stupid UK immigration laws.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2015-01-14T07:10:38.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:29.066Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2015-01-14T15:24:21.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2015-01-14T07:10:38.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":68103,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/68103.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Report on Westminster Paedophile Ring to be fully published to the public","background":null,"additional_details":"This petition aims to force the government, to fully publish the report on the Westminster Paedophile Ring to the public. It is vital that these monsters who abused and hurt children in the care system are punished, named and shamed so they cannot be in a position to continue to hurt vulnerable people, and made to face up to their crimes publicly.\r\n\r\nWhy should they receive anonymity and protection while many children's lives were destroyed by their abuse of power. So far, the report has been lost, a few member's names have been hinted at if nothing more. One judge has resigned while many more are still at large, still in a position of power; enabling them to continue to hurt children.\r\n\r\nCommon sense says the government will not publish the whole report, and do it over a period of a few years to try and avoid 'civil unrest'. These people need to be stopped, they need to be forced to face their victims and the public for what they have done.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-07-29T20:13:54.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:09.242Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-08-01T09:07:47.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-07-29T20:13:54.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":67124,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/67124.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop Training days in term time if parents are being fined for holidays in term time.","background":null,"additional_details":"Training days should be done in school holidays not in term time.\r\nAs parents we are told our children should be in school, we are being fined for holidays being taken in Term time and are even refused permission to have a day or two off unless for a very good reason.\r\nHow can it be justified that missing school due to Training days is ok? If they are so important then they should also be taken out of school hours.\r\nIt would seem highly unacceptable to a school if after 6 weeks summer holidays a child requested a day off on the very first day back to school in a new year but it is ok because it's a Training day?\r\nEither stop fining parents for taking their children out of school unless for extreme cases or stop training days being a reason for children to miss days of school.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-07-04T13:40:21.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:05.848Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-07-10T13:19:09.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-07-04T13:40:21.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":65950,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/65950.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"A large number of people are about to be cheated out of the pension to which they are entitled by this government","background":null,"additional_details":"In September the government will change the retirement rules so that those who retire after 2016 and who are currently entitled to a full state pension after having contributed to the scheme for 30 years will no longer be eligible and will have to work an additional five years.  Obviously, those who are now over the age of 58 will not be able to do this even if they were not too old to employ.\r\nThis is not only the usual breach of trust by the government but a breach of contract too.\r\nPlease sign this petition to have the date of the introduction of the new rules put back to 2020, at the earliest, in order to give people the opportunity to make up this contrived shortfall in their pension contributions.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-06-03T14:00:52.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:01.559Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-06-04T13:51:38.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-06-03T14:00:52.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":63810,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/63810.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Protect the Armed Forces Pension.","background":null,"additional_details":"While the need to restructure the finances of the UK is clear and apparent, targeting pensions for serving members of the Armed Forces should be and was illegal (Until 2013).\r\n\r\nThe aim of this petition is as follows:\r\n\r\nTo make the government re-think their stance on forcing members of the Armed Forces onto a pension scheme that will cost the individual money.\r\n\r\nProtect the rights of Service Personnel that have been promised one type of pension and then have that right denied.\r\n\r\nIntroduce a new law, Protecting all members of the UK from having pensions changed without reasonable reason (Currently to save a business becoming bankrupt is acceptable, However the MOD isn't going bankrupt?) ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-04-11T15:39:00.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:54.345Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-05-19T15:14:25.000Z","closed_at":"2015-02-19T16:14:25.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-04-11T15:39:00.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":63304,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/63304.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Fathers to have rights to legally make sure a mother of their child turns up to a child civil court case regarding  father visitation rights","background":null,"additional_details":"working father;s who want to have an active role in their child life with a ex partner who will refuse to turn up to a civil court case.\r\n\r\n100's of working class men pay for civil court cases to get access to their children, yet the mother of the children are not legally obliged to turn up to the court hearing.\r\n\r\nThis potion is to make the government hear all the voices like me and 100's of other willing fathers who are being denied their rights as a father due their being now law. In hand this makes the father lose a lot of money for court fees and has to spend more money out time and time again until the mother of the children decides to turn up.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-04-02T20:19:55.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:52.492Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-04-03T08:08:06.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-04-02T20:19:55.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":63123,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/63123.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Long Sentences for Crimes Against Disabled and Vulnerable People","background":null,"additional_details":"I want the government to insist on Long Jail Sentences for people found guilty of committing serious crimes against disabled and vulnerable people. In a recent case in Salford, three bullies who subjected a vulnerable Autistic teenager to a horrific three-day ‘torture’ ordeal walked free from court after judge Jonathan Geake handed out community service orders. I feel very strongly that this sends completely the wrong message to thugs like these and  sets us back 50 years in terms of disability discrimination. The victim was subjected to the following attack:\r\nKicked in the head and had his head stamped on, repeatedly punched, beaten with a tennis racket,   body sand-papered, thrown down a steep hill, pelted with dog mess, forced to drink alcohol until he passed out, subjected to further abuse involving a dog. He then had tape applied and ripped of his genitals.\r\n\r\nSurely these crimes, committed over three days, deserves a long custodial sentence.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-03-29T11:04:20.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:51.930Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-04-01T08:34:22.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-03-29T11:04:20.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":62819,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/62819.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"allow married couples/civil partners and common law partners to share their personal tax free allowance","background":null,"additional_details":"Allow mwrried couples and people living as such, common law and civil partnerships to share their tax free allowance.\r\n\r\nnot all couples have two people working for one reason or another espevially families who may have one parent at home with the children. I want the hmrc to accept this as a way of life and allow them to join there tax free allowance together in order to make family life easier.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-03-22T18:09:39.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:50.966Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-03-24T08:09:48.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-24T08:09:48.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-03-22T18:09:39.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":71026,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/71026.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop unnecessary Motorway Closures","background":null,"additional_details":"Complete closure of sections of Motorway overnight is unnecessary and harmful to the cost of living.\r\nThere should be no reason to completely close sections of motorway unless it is to demolish, replace or install a bridge over all 3 lanes.\r\nAt least one lane should be kept open at all times, even if that is just the hard shoulder to enable traffic flow, rather than lengthy diversions.\r\nThese diversions cost fuel, time and wear and tear to vehicles, all of which, (in the case of delivery vehicles) is then passed on the general public.\r\nHealth and Safety gone mad.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-10-18T05:23:08.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:19.633Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-10-21T12:02:52.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-10-18T05:23:08.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":70922,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/70922.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Ban payday lenders advertising on children's sports shirts","background":null,"additional_details":"This petition calls upon the UK Government to bring in legislation that prohibits the brands names and logos of Wonga and other payday lenders from being displayed on children’s replica sports shirts; bringing payday lenders in line with the alcoholic drinks and gambling industries, which are prohibited from displaying such brands on children’s replica shirts. ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-10-15T19:48:35.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:19.225Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-10-20T16:37:47.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-10-15T19:48:35.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":60801,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/60801.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Return the Elgin Marbles to the New Acropolis Museum, Athens, Greece","background":null,"additional_details":"The New Acropolis Museum is a fit and proper place for the original Parthenon marbles. They can be swapped for the replica casts on display at that museum.\r\nAn online petition is particularly apt as a democratic method for determining the return of its most important heritage to the country where democracy originated.\r\nThe return of the marbles would give a boost to tourism for Greece at a time when it needs all the additional income it can earn.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-02-12T17:33:52.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:44.033Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-02-13T10:31:45.000Z","closed_at":"2014-08-13T09:31:45.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-02-12T17:33:52.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":60502,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/60502.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Adainst the D.V.L.A for taking to long to renew HGV drivers vocational licences","background":null,"additional_details":"Why are the DVLA taking to long to renew HGV vocational licences after paying for a doctor to have a medical then the DVLA medical board hold up the drivers licence so he or she cannot work and cause misery to there families, and put Owner Drivers out of Business. Then have to claim Benefits costing the Government money. The 56 days allowed is way to long,they should be returned within 7 days.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-02-08T04:44:01.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:42.988Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-02-10T11:56:06.000Z","closed_at":"2015-02-10T11:56:06.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-02-08T04:44:01.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":59548,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/59548.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Prevention of Cultural Celebration","background":null,"additional_details":"   Councils are stripping the rights of the Orthodox Tewahedo Community in celebrating the 'Finding of the True Cross'. With no clear reason apart from a watered down response via email, vague and clear indication to not reading my initial emails to them; I am  outraged by the marginalization of the Orthodox Tewahedo Church. Thus, I ask you all to support me in this ministry mission of faith.\r\n   I aim to organise a Damera event that commemorates a historical event and I have clearly stated in my emails the bonfire will be 3m high and that a park is required. If there were health and safety issues, I would understand but how can there be in a wide open space? So what is the underlying issue, fear of integration or discrimination? The celebration symbolizes our commitment to the faith and our commitment to the faith re-affirming our devotion to Christ.  So I ask where is the religious freedom and equality? Where is our freedom of Cultural expression?\r\n   ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-01-21T22:17:35.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:39.650Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-01-27T16:09:04.000Z","closed_at":"2014-10-27T16:09:04.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-01-21T22:17:35.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":59423,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/59423.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"BAN XENON HEADLIGHTS","background":null,"additional_details":"Xenon head lights have been shown in many international research paper to affect badly eye retina and cause catarct .\r\nAbout 400,000 Britons are having Cataract surgery every year and the numbers are increasing dramatically with the increase of the number of cars fitted with Xenon headlights.\r\nIn addition, thousands of accidents on British roads are actually caused by the dazzling effect of Xenon head lights even though this cause is not researched and reported.\r\nIf Xenon head lights are left LOOSE on our roads, millions of Britons will be BLIND within a decade of being subjected to Xenon headlights.\r\n\r\nSUPPORT a TOTAL BAN ON XENON HEAD LIGHTS.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-01-18T14:16:44.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:39.208Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-01-20T09:03:30.000Z","closed_at":"2014-04-20T08:03:30.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-01-18T14:16:44.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":58303,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/58303.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"STOP CHARGING US FOR 0800,0845,0808,0500 NUMBERS","background":null,"additional_details":"This petition is simply asking UK Government and   Ofcom to ban  all UK mobile carries in charging the general public for : 0800, 0845, 0808, 0500 and any such numbers that relate to general enquires to UK Limited companies and PLC companies.\r\nOn average 85% of the British public have a mobile contract with free minutes its time that these firm give value to the British consumer and not rip them off by charging for the above numbers. Of course premium numbers such as 0901 and so forth are not included in this petition.At a time when the country is in deep financial crisis, the ordinary working people of this country are still losing their jobs, suffering wage freezes while living costs are spiralling, and the government cutting or capping benefit payments.  Is it right for these firm to charge the general public? For something that they already should get as part of their free minute allowance.\r\nWaheed Rafiq\r\nMember of the General Public\r\nwww.waheedrafiq.com\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2013-12-14T12:22:30.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:35.332Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-12-17T09:11:23.000Z","closed_at":"2014-09-17T08:11:23.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-12-14T12:22:30.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":57410,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/57410.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Allow dogs in private rented, council rented, leasehold and freehold homes!!!","background":null,"additional_details":"Living in private rented property, I find it frustrating I am unable to have any pets, let alone a dog. Not having a deposit to buy my own home has forced me into private renting, and I don't qualify for council housing.\r\n\r\nIf you rent or leasehold somewhere you are paying someone to have use of the 'building' as your own, so why are we not all allowed to treat it as our own home?\r\n\r\nThere being so many dogs in need of homes in rescue centres upsets me as I am able (if it wasn't for my landlord/freeholder) to give a dog or 2 a home.\r\n\r\nHaving previously been a responsible dog owner, I understand the care of a dog.\r\n\r\nI also understand that dogs can be an annoyance, if not cared for properly or without the right training.\r\n\r\nI am asking for no restrictions on pets/dogs in all properties, but understand there must be guidelines and boundaries in place to protect neighbours from things like continuous noise such as barking and owners to be able to inspect the property.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2013-11-22T00:17:28.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:32.098Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-11-29T16:11:30.000Z","closed_at":"2014-11-29T16:11:30.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-11-22T00:17:28.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":57317,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/57317.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Allow under 16s to be referred to CAHMS without the need for parental permission","background":null,"additional_details":"Over 850,000 children in the UK have been diagnosed with a mental health issue, however there are also a significant number who are currently battling against similar problems but have not been able to reach out for help. Currently CAMHS (child and adolescent mental health service) requires that anyone under the age of 16, first has to obtain their parent's permission in order to get the help they desperately need. This is not, however, an option that many children can take, as they may not have the courage to tell them or their parents may be part of the problem.\r\n\r\nThere are children that need urgent help in order to tackle feelings of depression, suicide, paranoia and the likes, but are being prevented from doing so, despite wanting the help. It is of vital importance that the government allows a child of any age to reach out to the mental health service without any worry of the repercussions. ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2013-11-19T17:36:29.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:31.761Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-11-26T10:13:06.000Z","closed_at":"2014-11-26T10:13:06.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-11-19T17:36:29.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":55713,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/55713.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Better rights for cohabitants","background":null,"additional_details":"We call for the implementation without delay of proposals giving cohabiting couples fair and reasonable redress upon relationship breakdown and upon intestacy, based upon the proposals made in the Law Commission’s 2007 and 2011 reports because:\r\n1. The present lack of provision protecting cohabiting couples upon relationship breakdown is unsatisfactory and unfair to them and their children;\r\n2. The law of intestacy needs reform to protect the position of those in cohabiting relationships when their partners die;\r\n3. The Law Commission’s proposals are fair, proportionate and workable and would not in any sense undermine marriage or civil partnerships;\r\n4. Achieving fair arrangements for cohabiting couples on relationship breakdown and intestacy is a necessary part of creating a fair society.\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2013-10-10T11:29:05.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:26.159Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-10-18T10:24:47.000Z","closed_at":"2014-10-18T10:24:47.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-10-10T11:29:05.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":55230,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/55230.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Congestion Charge PCN - STOP THE UNFAIR FINES","background":null,"additional_details":"1) If a motorist has not paid their Congestion Charge - Send them a reminder with payment details.\r\n\r\n2) Update the lacking signage to include the payment terms (by the next day) to ensure motorists have fair warning to pay before receiving fines.\r\n\r\n3) Make it clear on the HOME page of the congestion charging website that payment must be made beforehand or by the following day.\r\n\r\n4) Allow a fair amount of time to pay the congestion charge, after receiving a reminder / invoice.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2013-09-25T12:36:44.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:24.520Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-09-26T08:05:39.000Z","closed_at":"2014-09-26T08:05:39.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-09-25T12:36:44.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54109,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54109.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"All commercial organisations to provide email address for contact","background":null,"additional_details":"All commercial organisations should provide an email address for contact, complaint, order and service enquiries.\r\nUtilities and other large companies are too quick to take orders but make it difficult to make enquiries except through their web site, their call centres or by mail.\r\nOften this seems to be to allow them the opportunity to sell alternative services when people phone up for another reason.   It also makes it difficult to keep a record of any discussions or decisions.\r\nWeb forms to make an enquiry or complaint rarely provide the sender with a copy.\r\nThe best and simplest way is to use email which then allows the person to keep all discussion points on record until the issue has been cleared.\r\n\r\nEven Ofcom make it difficult and only provide a web page submission.\r\n\r\nAnswer:  Make it a legal requirement for all Commercial organisations, Utilities, other large organisations to provide a live email address to be able to submit questions, complaints or other communications\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2013-08-22T09:29:34.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:20.626Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-08-30T09:51:34.000Z","closed_at":"2014-08-30T09:51:34.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-08-22T09:29:34.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54065,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54065.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Implement Full Financial Compensation for  individuals serving Jury Duty","background":null,"additional_details":"It is said that it is a public duty to serve when called for jury duty.  If this is the case then why is it that an unfortunate minority are forced to foot the bill.  This can be a very expensive exercise for many.  If jury service is not to be voluntary, as it should be, then those who are forced to serve should not suffer financially as a result.  Full compensation should come from the public purse and the burden not be placed on the individual.  This is an infringement on civil liberties and quite frankly an outdated practice.\r\n Please sign this petition to show your support for a change in the law to provide those who serve the justice system with full financial compensation for loss of earnings.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2013-08-20T20:26:34.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:20.476Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-08-21T08:41:14.000Z","closed_at":"2014-08-21T08:41:14.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-08-20T20:26:34.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":53941,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/53941.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop the planned regulation of investigators","background":null,"additional_details":"We, the undersigned, call on the government to stop the planned regulation of investigatory organisations on any one of the following grounds:\r\n\r\n1. There already exist adequate laws to deal with abuses by private eyes and other investigators and the creation of yet another regulatory quango would be a waste of money.\r\n\r\n2. The headline making crimes that brought about the politicised call for the regulation of investigators have been commissioned and paid for by the media and law firms which would be exempt from the proposed out-of-date legislation anyway (cf The Private Security Industry Act 2001).\r\n\r\n3. Since June 2013 the media (cf USA NSA revelations) have revealed the government is involved in the illegal and/or questionable access of UK citizens’ personal data; rather than regulate private eyes it should legislate that any data relating to UK citizens no matter how obtained (including by governmental organisations such as GCHQ) be only obtained and accessed lawfully. ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2013-08-16T17:42:09.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:19.987Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-08-19T10:12:24.000Z","closed_at":"2014-08-19T10:12:24.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-08-16T17:42:09.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":53889,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/53889.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop RyanAir unfair charges/fines for customers","background":null,"additional_details":"This is a request for a full investigation into the RayanAir practice of misleading/conning passengers into extortionate fines and charges.\r\n\r\nI was recently charged 70 euro each (x4) for a young lady to write 4 boarding passes in under two minutes, making her hourly rate 2,100 euro.\r\n\r\nI tried to comply with RyanAir terms and conditions by checking in online and printing my boarding passes. I did this with minimal telephone network coverage and on their completely inaccessible website - which crashed.\r\n\r\nTheir fault, not mine. Yet I was made to pay 280 Euro for their dreadful website errors.\r\n\r\nThese charges must stop. Sign the petition to start the process!","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2013-08-15T12:08:58.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:19.803Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-08-16T09:36:20.000Z","closed_at":"2014-02-16T10:36:20.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-08-15T12:08:58.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":53117,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/53117.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Empty properties total council tax exemption","background":null,"additional_details":"My house is up for sale and empty.Since April 2013 local councils have been able to set the length of council tax exemption on unoccupied and unfurnished properties.Mine was three months which is now up.How can my council tax be the same as my neighbours who have a family of four compared to an empty property.\r\nThe Government want to fill empty properties to help with the housing shortage.Well could you please give house sellers who have left their property vacant, who need to sell for financial reasons a chance of putting their house on the market without adding to the financial burden","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2013-07-25T19:47:08.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:17.220Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-08-02T09:05:53.000Z","closed_at":"2014-08-02T09:05:53.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-07-25T19:47:08.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":75179,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/75179.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Change the Care Order Form C110A to protect Adoptive Parent who return child to state care for medical reasons only","background":null,"additional_details":"CARE ORDER Form C110A fails to protect adoptive parents whose adopted child is returned to Local Authority Care for extreme medical reasons only. As the form stands: Part 4 of the Children Act 1989 states:The grounds for the application are that the child(ren) is suffering or is likely to suffer, significant harm and the harm or likelihood of harm is because the child is:\r\n\r\n•\tnot receiving care that would be reasonably expected from a parent, or\r\n•\tis beyond parental control\r\n\r\nThere is no third entry box for ‘because of extreme medical needs’.\r\n\r\nI want a new third entry box in Section 4:  Has extreme medical needs.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2015-02-25T08:28:30.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:33.032Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2015-03-18T11:18:39.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2015-02-25T08:28:30.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":57226,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/57226.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Force private companies awarded contracts with taxpayer funds to pay corporation tax","background":null,"additional_details":"Recently it has become common knowledge that some private companies that have been awarded contracts via taxpayer funds have managed to escape paying corporation tax. Please sign this petition and show your support to force ALL private companies awarded uk contracts with taxpayer funds to pay corporation tax.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2013-11-17T16:56:49.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:31.446Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-11-18T12:55:04.000Z","closed_at":"2014-11-18T12:55:04.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-11-17T16:56:49.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":73197,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/73197.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Make the nhs routinely screen for GBS","background":null,"additional_details":"Screening for GBS is not recommended by the UK National Screening Committee nor the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists .An antenatal screening program, using tests specifically designed to detect group B Strep carriage, would identify more women whose babies are at increased risk of GBS infection than using risk factors alone.  Research shows that as a result of these additional cases being prevented, this could save the government an estimated £37 million per year.\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-12-20T20:52:42.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:27.108Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-12-22T10:52:34.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-12-20T20:52:42.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":72712,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/72712.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Post Graduate Funding is ageist","background":null,"additional_details":"The recent announcement of Post Graduate funding is a milestone for anyone wanting to progress their careers, or pursue a research based career.\r\n\r\nHowever, the recent announcement also highlights the ageist nature of the funding as there are many people over the age of 30 that would like to engage in post graduate education, but cannot afford to do so.\r\n\r\nIf the government is using the length remaining of a career as its reasons for not funding over 30s, then this is not a good enough reason; they already fund people in their 50s and 60s for undergraduate qualifications.\r\n\r\nPlease sign this petition should you believe that this funding stream should be made available to anyone wanting to pursue a post graduate qualification.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-12-03T14:44:43.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:25.598Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-12-03T17:14:33.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-12-03T14:44:43.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":72685,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/72685.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Repeal amendment to the 2003 Communications Act","background":null,"additional_details":"Government today amended 2003 Communications Act to ban the following from pornography online:\r\nSpanking\r\nCaning\r\nAggressive whipping\r\nPenetration by any object \"associated with violence\"\r\nPhysical or verbal abuse (regardless of  if consensual)\r\nUrolagnia (known as \"water sports\")\r\nFemale ejaculation\r\nStrangulation\r\nFacesitting\r\nFisting\r\n\r\nA great deal of which seems to be targeting female pleasure as well as acts which particularly feature in gay pornography.\r\nMoreover, they are consensual acts by adults watched by consenting adults.\r\nWe are telling you to stop interfering with non-issues.  ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-12-02T22:50:10.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:25.523Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-12-04T15:58:05.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-12-02T22:50:10.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":71171,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/71171.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Cap the number of homes a private landlord can buy","background":null,"additional_details":"Private landlords now own 18% of all homes in Britain, according to a 2014 report by a mortgage lender.\r\n\r\nThis buy-to-let trend has and will continue to increase house prices & rental rates.\r\n\r\nIt reduces the housing stock available to first time buyers and puts pressure on councils to permit building new homes on limited agricultural land, best used for growing crops to feed our growing population.\r\n\r\nPrivate landlords can improve housing and contribute to the economy but their contribution to housing in the UK needs to be sustainable. This would be best done by limiting the number of houses one person/company can buy. The limit could be a maximum of 5 homes for example. There are individuals in the UK currently with property portfolios in excess of 500 homes! ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-10-22T13:43:58.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:20.206Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-11-21T14:56:37.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-10-22T13:43:58.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":71538,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/71538.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Cats Should Be Reported if Knocked Down","background":null,"additional_details":"A pet cat close to our heart does not have to be legally reported if it has been knocked down. There are so many missing cats and this is because there is not a law set in place for reporting such a tragedy. A pet dog is no different to a pet cat. Both are very much loved animals and cat owners have no rights to any laws. I feel there should be a law set in place where a cat is treated the same as a dog.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-11-01T02:49:45.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:21.473Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-11-03T07:37:28.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-11-01T02:49:45.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":70308,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/70308.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Independent Investigation into the horrific deaths of David Miller and Hannah Witheridge","background":null,"additional_details":"Knowing full well that the Thai authorities are notoriously corrupt and have in the past intentionally withheld and/or planted evidence in order to protect murderers that are well connected, and with accusations of police offering bribes to false witnesses, we are not able to trust that the two Myanmar nationals being detained at present have not had their confessions forced out of them and as such we cannot trust that they are responsible for the horrific rape and murders of David Miller, 24, and Hannah Witheridge, 23.This being said, we demand a full independent investigation to be conducted by the government of the United Kingdom into these deaths in the hopes that the families of these victims may know that justice has been served.\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-10-03T08:05:20.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:17.126Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-10-11T19:18:05.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-10-03T08:05:20.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":69573,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/69573.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"More funding for care of the elderly both in care homes and hospitals","background":null,"additional_details":"More funding for the elderly both in hospitals and care homes and make it illegal for care home owners to say they don't want someone back just because their needs have increased following a hospital admission. Have a systematic approach to re assess needs every time there is a change. More and more funding for care of the elderly wards to have more nursing staff to assist every patient adequately and safely. The number of nurses per patient is unacceptable for the care of the elderly wards.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-09-15T15:32:40.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:14.329Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-09-16T06:37:04.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-09-15T15:32:40.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":69073,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/69073.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Motion for Discussion supporting protection of Kurdish - Yezidi community against a Genocide","background":null,"additional_details":"Reports of violence, repression and murder by Isis and other extremist groups have become increasingly prevalent in Iraq. The most vulnerable group has been the Yezidis who are a small Kurdish ethno-religious community.\r\nThey are currently running in fear of their lives from \"Islamic State\" (IS) militants, who have killed and captured thousands and still hunting them  since the beginning of August.\r\nThere is a need of special protection for this community to avoid its extermination.\r\n\r\nMore details about the Yezidis below:\r\n\r\nhttp://goo.gl/ScQo1Z\r\n\r\nhttp://goo.gl/8HxqTh\r\n\r\nhttp://goo.gl/C0096i\r\n\r\nhttp://goo.gl/yHNYmY\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-09-01T09:46:24.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:12.583Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-09-03T10:19:49.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-09-01T09:46:24.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":68042,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/68042.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"The UK to help Bring Hamas Terrorists before an International War Crimes Tribunal","background":null,"additional_details":"That the UK Government must help bring Hamas Terrorists before an International War Crimes Tribunal as soon as possible. The reason for this is simple. Hamas is going against all international norms of Conducting a War in the 21st Century, here the Geneva Conventions in its unjustified War against Israel. Hamas is deliberately stockpiling and launching weapons from urban heavily populated zones, here Schools, Hospitals and places of Worship. Such areas of not military thus are not allowed to be used in this manner in the first place and in times of war. Nor is Hamas conducting its unlawful War against Legitimate Israeli Military Zones rather Hamas is only targeting Israeli civilians. Please support this e-petition.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-07-27T15:24:43.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:09.040Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-07-29T12:01:23.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-07-27T15:24:43.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":64676,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/64676.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Councils to build new council houses","background":null,"additional_details":"As a councillor I see first hand how young family's struggle to get on the housing market note average new build house prices 150'000 to 200'000. in more in rural villages And area like London house prices have shot through the roof which mean only the richest can afford to get on the housing market.Also we hear the word affordable housing this is a joke this only means a provision for social housing not the house is cheap to buy. renting houses has also gone up exponentially  pushing family's to the brink of food poverty.And making landlord very wealthy indeed.Councils need to start a massive rebuilding of council houses to give  family's a chance of house.It's time for the government to act on this housing time bomb .","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-05-05T09:04:01.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:57.241Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-05-06T09:45:47.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-05-05T09:04:01.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":64377,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/64377.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"winter fuel payment / allowance to be paid at 60","background":null,"additional_details":"Older people still feel the cold at 60 and find it hard to heat their homes. The winter fuel payments should be payable at 60 regardless of the state pension age , after all we are not all on an MP's wage of £65,000.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-04-27T09:27:42.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:56.280Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-04-29T11:06:07.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-04-27T09:27:42.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":61772,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/61772.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Impose severe sanctions due to the Russian invasion of Crimea,Ukraine.","background":null,"additional_details":"The Russian occupation of Ukraine violates international law and should be opposed in the strongest terms. The US should impose sanctions to express our outrage over Russian aggression.\r\n\r\nSanctions should include:\r\n\r\n1. Eliminating Russia's membership in G8 and G20.\r\n\r\n2. Removing Russia's membership in the WTO.\r\n\r\n3. Cancelling US visas to members of the Russian Government and Ruling Party Parliament members and their families.\r\n\r\n4. Banning import of dual-use technologies to Russia, that may help to develop their armed forces.\r\n\r\n5. Freezing assets and open investigation of money-laundering activities conducted by Russian officials in USA.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":10,"created_at":"2014-03-02T11:08:55.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:47.437Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-03-06T16:56:01.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-06T16:56:01.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-03-02T11:08:55.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}}]}