{"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=393&parliament=2&state=all","first":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?state=all","last":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=1219&state=all","next":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=394&state=all","prev":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=392&state=all"},"data":[{"type":"archived-petition","id":55484,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/55484.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Introduce measures to make mobile operators, manufacturers & public take steps to reduce mobile phone theft / crime","background":null,"additional_details":"700000 mobile handsets were stolen last year, according to the Home Office. This represents significant cost & drain on police resource & even greater loss to the public who pay for the police & thefts.\r\nTechnology could make mobile phone theft less viable & less attractive. The government should look at getting operators/manufacturers to bear some of these costs if they do not introduce crime reduction methodologies or campaigns.\r\nOperators, manufacturers & the public should be more proactive in using existing security facilities & capability of the current mobile phone generation.\r\nOperators should be required to run national campaigns, making public aware & able to set up security & other measures, e.g. tracking & immobilising.\r\nFinally, the public should be incentivised to implement available security measures to the full. Consider making mobile phone insurance mandatory & raise excess premiums for theft victims who have not implemented these security measures.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-10-03T10:32:52.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:25.438Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-10-03T10:42:57.000Z","closed_at":"2014-10-03T10:42:57.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-10-03T10:32:52.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":23609,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/23609.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Purchase utilities from the Government","background":null,"additional_details":"Purchase utilities from the Government.\r\n\r\nWe should be able to purchase our power etc from a government source so the profit is retained by our country.\r\n\r\nWe are bombarded with suppliers of power that do not manufacture their product but just sell it on so why can we not buy from No11 direct.\r\n\r\nThe price could be linked to the average of the providers but we the country can reinvest the profits into our hospitals schools etc or reducing the debt burden","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2011-11-22T13:37:14.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:37.704Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-11-23T10:49:49.000Z","closed_at":"2012-11-23T10:49:49.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-11-22T13:37:14.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":55543,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/55543.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop the wind turbine being built in King's Lynn","background":null,"additional_details":"They are building a new wind turbine near north Lynn which will stand 200ft tall. You can see it being built right now. This needs to be taken down straight away. whether your anti wind or you just generally care about the landscape this so called landmark needs to be stop. I do not need to describe why wind power is bad they is plenty information out there. But i thought we at least deserve a say on whether it should be built. if we live in a democracy we should be allowed to choose our energy sources and where they go. ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-10-05T10:40:32.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:25.621Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-10-08T14:29:58.000Z","closed_at":"2014-10-08T14:29:58.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-10-05T10:40:32.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":23599,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/23599.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"RBS Shares for all taxpayers","background":null,"additional_details":"The government should give the majority portion of the RBS shares they hold to all UK income tax payers. The bank was bought and rescued using tax payers money in the first place. The trade in these shares would in turn generate a windfall to help stimulate the economy.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2011-11-22T11:56:06.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:37.666Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-11-23T09:03:16.000Z","closed_at":"2012-11-23T09:03:16.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-11-22T11:56:06.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":55194,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/55194.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Listed properties should be exempt of proposed mansion tax","background":null,"additional_details":"The Government has a major chance to support the UK's built Heritage by exempting listed properties from any proposed mansion tax.\r\nThis would financially support existing owners who already have the burden of high running and maintenance costs. It would encourage new investment as many potential purchasers currently overlook listed buildings. It would give listed buildings a deserved tax advantage.\r\nIf listed buildings are NOT exempt then what would be the incentive for owners to maintain and improve these properties as any increase in value will result in an increased tax liability? In fact many owners may decide to allow properties fall into poor condition in order to cap their tax liability or in order not to breach the proposed £2m threshold.\r\nThe economic and social benefit would outweigh any tax revenue raised. If the Government wants to ensure the future viability of the UK's built heritage then make owning a listed property a more desirable prospect.\r\n\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-09-24T10:37:42.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:24.390Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-09-25T06:50:05.000Z","closed_at":"2014-09-25T06:50:05.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-09-24T10:37:42.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54945,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54945.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"The Queen should abdicate in 2020","background":null,"additional_details":"I believe the time is coming for the Queen to Abdicate in the near future.\r\nIn 2020, she will be 94 years old and her reign will have lasted 68 years.\r\nI am sure she will always be committed to her role as monarch but old age & infirmity is inevitable. A country's head of state should be active and able. Prince Charles would be a good King for 10-20 years after this and should be allowed to take the role.\r\nAbdication is not the same as giving up and Queen Elizabeth has more than earned a peaceful retirement. I believe she should be able to retire and remove any stigma of royal abdications; after all there have been 3 in Europe this year!","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-09-16T14:06:26.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:23.608Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-09-16T14:56:32.000Z","closed_at":"2014-09-16T14:56:32.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-09-16T14:06:26.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54356,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54356.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Vehicle Tax System Rationalisation","background":null,"additional_details":"Currently in the UK Vehicle Tax and Insurance are two separate payments to separate entities, but BOTH are legally required.  The current bizarre systemic disconnection between Tax and Insurance can and has lead to repeated situations whereby one may be Taxed but not Insured or vice-versa.\r\n\r\nThis petition calls for a thorough and complete overhaul of the Vehicle Tax System and appropriate legislation, in order to merge both Tax and Insurance into a single payment directly to Financial Institutions.  Thusly, as opposed to the status-quo HM Government would NOT directly collect Vehicle Tax from responsible entities (i.e vehicle owners) but rather from Financial Institutions, who in turn would 'build-in' the Tax charge into the insurance charge (and who would thereby further remunerate HM Government accordingly).\r\n\r\nThis system would offer benefits to all stakeholders, simplify the Tax system, and reduce the risk of having any untaxed or insured vehicles on the road.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-08-29T10:23:54.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:21.530Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-08-30T07:03:36.000Z","closed_at":"2014-08-30T07:03:36.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-08-29T10:23:54.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54349,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54349.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Remove David Cameron from the decision making process over Syria.","background":null,"additional_details":"David Cameron is trying to placate his wife's 'outrage' over Syrian human rights violations and therefore is emotionally compromised and unable to make sound, sensible, reasoned judgements in the situation.  For this reason alone he MUST be conflicted over how to keep his promise to his wife and therefore he MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-08-29T07:51:48.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:21.502Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-09-02T09:50:46.000Z","closed_at":"2014-09-02T09:50:46.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-08-29T07:51:48.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54454,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54454.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"No VAT on car repairs","background":null,"additional_details":"Our Government already receives massive amounts of money from the purchase of fuel & Road Tax.\r\nThe 20% VAT on repair bills adversely affects those who cannot afford to buy new cars therefore must maintain second hand, older cars in order to remain mobile, drive to work or use their work vehicle for business purposes.\r\nThis additional financial burden is increasingly the last straw for small businesses.\r\nKeep Britain mobile & working!\r\nSCRAP VAT ON CAR REPAIRS ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-08-31T17:34:42.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:21.881Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-09-02T08:18:17.000Z","closed_at":"2014-09-02T08:18:17.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-08-31T17:34:42.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":23515,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/23515.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"CSA to consider both parents earnings","background":null,"additional_details":"Proposal to amend the CSA to take into account the earnings of BOTH parents.For example if the parent with responsibility earns 5 times the income of the parent without surely it is unjust that the non-resident parent should pay maintenance when the resident parent is more than capable of supporting the child ? ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2011-11-21T16:23:22.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:37.394Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-11-22T10:17:04.000Z","closed_at":"2012-11-22T10:17:04.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-11-21T16:23:22.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":23503,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/23503.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Costs of EU Membership","background":null,"additional_details":"In view of the UK disastrous finacial state. We the people of the UK instruct the Government and MPs  not under any circumstance to pay any increase or extra increases to the EU Commission for our membership until the UK is fully back on its feet and that should this petition succeed under no circumstaces are the Whips to be allowed to interfer with the petition","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2011-11-21T14:17:35.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:37.358Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-11-22T09:44:21.000Z","closed_at":"2012-11-22T09:44:21.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-11-21T14:17:35.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":54403,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/54403.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Say yes to a recall of Parliament to support military action against Syria","background":null,"additional_details":"Petition to recall Parliament to overturn it's appalling decision last night not to support military action against the Assad regime, such support to given  once it is clear that there is a hgh probability that the chemical weapons were used by the forces of the Syrian Government","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-08-30T11:50:35.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:21.691Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-09-02T09:50:13.000Z","closed_at":"2013-12-02T10:50:13.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-08-30T11:50:35.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":53967,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/53967.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Set a Maximum limit for all loan APR of 75%","background":null,"additional_details":"The instigation of a new financial law limiting the maximum loan APR to 75% for all financial loans.\r\n\r\nThis new law would protect the vulnerable from excessive   APR practices of some existing loan companies and prevent the creations of loans above the threshold in the future. ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-08-17T16:31:53.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:20.108Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-08-28T07:04:23.000Z","closed_at":"2014-08-28T07:04:23.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-08-17T16:31:53.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":25975,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/25975.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Peak Oil Crisis","background":null,"additional_details":"Asking the government to have a public debate on the impending global energy crisis with peak oil having been passed and to show a clear and concise plan for measures to address life after oil has gone. ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2011-12-17T06:32:29.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:44.640Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-12-19T11:07:21.000Z","closed_at":"2012-12-19T11:07:21.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-12-17T06:32:29.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":53878,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/53878.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Motorway Roadworks","background":null,"additional_details":"These are the actions, we the signed, wish the government to take to improve implementation of roadworks.\r\n\r\n- Limit the length of lane closures on the motorway to a bare minimum, lane closures for several miles with one person working 8 miles in are not necessary.\r\n\r\n- Overhead gantry signs should worn people up to a maximum of 1 mile before lane closures, not several miles before, forcing all road users into a single lane for miles when the lanes are still open.\r\n\r\n- Have repeater signs starting one mile before any lane closures teaching people how to merge, this will stop people getting into a single lane a long way back, rather than using all open lanes until the lane closure as is stipulated in the highway code.\r\n\r\n- When there is not any workmen (i.e. at night), the lane closures and/or temporary speed measures must be lifted. This will be easier if the closures are smaller in length.\r\n\r\nThanks","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-08-15T08:03:31.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:19.760Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-08-16T09:36:12.000Z","closed_at":"2014-08-16T09:36:12.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-08-15T08:03:31.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":23494,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/23494.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Ask Network Rail to Rename St Pancras","background":null,"additional_details":"As the Government is the owner of Network Rail, I would like the government to instruct Network rail to rename St Pancras station.\r\n\r\nSince there is a long European tradition of naming international railway terminuses after military victories. For example, Gare d'Austerlitz in Paris, and Waterloo in London. In addition St Pancras is only a minor saint. Since Waterloo is no longer an international terminus it would be appropriate to rename St Pancreas station Agincourt station to maintain this European tradition.\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2011-11-21T13:21:45.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:37.326Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-11-21T13:40:11.000Z","closed_at":"2012-11-21T13:40:11.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-11-21T13:21:45.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":53803,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/53803.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Bring the Dartford tolls into the 21st century by offering online / mobile payments to reduce lengthy, persistent and worsening congestion on the M25!","background":null,"additional_details":"The congestion caused by vehicles waiting to pay the £2.00 toll is maddening. It isn’t uncommon to wait for two hours or more, increasing journey times and thus pollution by a significant margin. Why? And for how long will the public have to suffer?\r\n\r\nTechnology has to hold the answer. I truly believe that there is MASSIVE demand for a technology-based solution to the “problem tolls” on the Dartford crossing. Even if queues are likely during peak times with the new technology in place, if the flow rate is increased and the waiting time reduced it has to be a positive outcome for hundreds of thousands of people each week. It’s a captive audience, granted, but to let this go on and worsen in the future is simply barbaric.\r\n\r\nPlease sign this petition and ask the government to take steps to immediately improve the service offered to all us customers using the Dartford Toll.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-08-13T15:14:50.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:19.522Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-08-14T09:24:24.000Z","closed_at":"2014-08-14T09:24:24.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-08-13T15:14:50.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":23479,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/23479.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Call for the Government to accept EU regulation of 'Buy to Let' Mortgages","background":null,"additional_details":"EU regulation would restrict 'Buy to Let' mortgage availability and force landlords who are unable to remortgage to sell up, generating lower house prices (therefore more affordable houses) for all those first time buyers who are currently renting.\r\n\r\nAt its heart, the EU draft Directive on Credit Agreements Relating to Residential Property says says buy-to-let mortgages should be regulated in the same way as residential mortgages. This would prevent lenders from taking anticipated rental income into account when deciding the amount of the loan.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2011-11-21T11:32:04.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:37.280Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-11-29T10:09:24.000Z","closed_at":"2012-11-29T10:09:24.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-11-21T11:32:04.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":53572,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/53572.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"To Reform Student Finance And High Rent In A Way That Is Fair To All Students","background":null,"additional_details":"Having been a student for two years I have experienced that student loans are not big enough if both your parents are earning. And I'm not meaning earning a lot, I'm meaning fairly low paid jobs.\r\n\r\nThis means that students with parents who are unemployed get more at University, even in bursary's meaning many struggle while their parents try to scrap some money together to help. I am asking for an even loan system where everyone receives a loan the same as the next rather than a means system that doesn't seem to work.\r\n\r\nI am also asking for a rent cap of 50% of the loan as it seems that at some University's 75% of the loan is being used as rent leaving students with pennies to live on.\r\n\r\nTherefore I ask for the Government to get rid of the means testing and to give everyone the same amount and for a rent cap. ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-08-07T02:06:11.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:18.810Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-08-12T15:44:51.000Z","closed_at":"2014-08-12T15:44:51.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-08-07T02:06:11.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":53713,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/53713.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Remove Race option from the 2021 census","background":null,"additional_details":"Race does not exist. By allowing a \"race\" category on the census, governments are agreeing that people, whatever their current situation and culture and beliefs, can be judged and categorised according to their skin colour.\r\n\r\nIf the govt wants to know where people are coming from, then ask their ancestrial national heritage.\r\nThe numerous additions to the race and ethnicity category of black british, asian british, black caribbean, black africa,, west indies, etc...says nothing of their culture or heritage, just as much as \"white other\" does as well. It only displays that the UK government is also struggling to categorise these people properly as well.\r\n\r\nPlease think about the ridiculousness of attemting to still categorise people according to race. It doesnt work, and it doesnt exist. We are all one: human.  ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-08-10T17:30:14.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:19.254Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-08-12T10:05:30.000Z","closed_at":"2014-08-12T10:05:30.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-08-10T17:30:14.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":53370,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/53370.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Public Inquiry into the deaths of 23 Chinese cockle-pickers who drowned in Morecambe Bay and illegal immigration in general.","background":null,"additional_details":"We, the undersigned, call on the government to hold a Public Inquiry into the drowning of 23 Chinese cockle-pickers in Morecambe Bay on 5th February 2004. These people were illegal immigrants who were exploited by greedy gangmasters who paid the cockle-pickers as litttle as £8 a day to dig out cockles. Over a year before this tragic event occurred, the activities of illegal Chinese immigrants had been reported by locals to local Labour MP Geraldine Smith. She wrote to the Home Office to inform them of this and to determine what action would be taken. The response by Labour's Junior Home Office Minister, Fiona Mactaggart, was that nothing would be done due to \"resource issues\" and that \"little useful purpose would have been served by sending officers to assist.\" What has been done to tackle illegal immigration since the tragedy in 2004?","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-08-01T18:35:11.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:18.117Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-08-05T09:04:56.000Z","closed_at":"2014-02-05T10:04:56.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-08-01T18:35:11.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":23434,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/23434.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Debate over the sale of Northern Rock","background":null,"additional_details":"Northern Rock has been sold at a cut price to a private investor at expense to the British taxpayer.\r\n\r\nThe taxpayer had no choice in contributing billions to the bailout of Northern rock and no choice on the sale or price and timing of that sale to private investors but now on top of that we learn of a secret deal, involving \"European authorities\" that ensured Northern Rock had to be sold by 2013!\r\n\r\nWhat was this secret deal, who exactly was it made with and why was it made and most of all why were the British taxpayers not informed about it?\r\nThese are very important issues and they relate directly to issues regarding insider trading (Who knew of this deal and who did not)\r\n\r\nEssentially the taxpayer was forced to buy a bad company and pay over the odds and then forced to sell this company at cut price.\r\nThis issue has much wider implications too so let's have it openly debated and get some answers!\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2011-11-20T20:56:39.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:37.144Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-11-21T08:22:30.000Z","closed_at":"2012-11-21T08:22:30.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-11-20T20:56:39.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":53436,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/53436.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Standard weekend opening hours for GPs","background":null,"additional_details":"With doctors' surgeries open during the standard working days and hours of most other workers across the country, it makes it extremely difficult for a visit to the GP to be made by many.\r\n\r\nForcing GPs to stay open over weekends allows people to create appointments, call up and drop in at potentially the only times they are able to do so.\r\n\r\nBritons' health is one of the most important things the government should be focusing on, hence limiting a GP surgery to basic hours on weekdays only is not enough.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-08-03T07:51:45.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:18.357Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-08-05T10:29:03.000Z","closed_at":"2013-11-05T11:29:03.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-08-03T07:51:45.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":53066,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/53066.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Keep politicians off UK bank notes","background":null,"additional_details":"While acknowledging the achievements of Winston Churchill I believe that using Churchill's image on the next £5 note sets a dangerous precedent. Churchill was not elected unanimously, neither was he universally loved. Like all politicians he was paid to do a job and did that to the best of his ability, but like all politicians his leadership attracted divided opinion. Britain has a long heritage of brilliant scientists, artists, musicians, entertainers, writers, explorers and social reformers, all of whom would be universally welcomed on to our national currency.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-07-24T19:01:22.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:17.040Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-07-25T13:29:22.000Z","closed_at":"2014-07-25T13:29:22.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-07-24T19:01:22.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":52877,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/52877.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"dangerous and aggressive dogs","background":null,"additional_details":"Please consult with the police and encourage each constabulary  to monitor  and  report  on  each and every reported incident  of dangerous and aggressive dogs,   when they cause  injury  to people or to other animals.\r\nThere should be a line item  in the crime figures    \"Dangerous dog attacks\"\r\n\r\nSome police officers currently  \"fob you off\"   when members of the public report  on  aggressive dogs making an attack  on the public highway.\r\nToo  many aggressive dogs  are being allowed  to roam the streets  and  some police  officers  seem  \"not bothered\"   when serious incidents are reported to them.\r\n\r\nPolice officers  need to be  trained  on the correct response  when attending  dog attack incidents.  ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-07-19T12:54:59.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:16.288Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-07-19T13:06:35.000Z","closed_at":"2014-07-19T13:06:35.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-07-19T12:54:59.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":52892,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/52892.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Declassify SOCA's list of Suspect Companies and Individuals","background":null,"additional_details":"The Serious Organised Crime Agency has classified the names of an undisclosed number blue chip companies, law firms and individuals, who are believed to have commissioned PIs to perform illegal activities.  These activities included the hacking of people's phones and computers with a means to gain commercially from the information on their competitors.  SOCA claims that the publishing of these names could \"substantially undermine the financial viability of major organisations\" but for that reason alone the accused, many of which SOCA's certain are guilty, will not answer fully for their actions.  Sign to reverse SOCA's efforts to politicise the legal system in this country.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-07-19T21:24:31.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:16.343Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-07-22T09:56:41.000Z","closed_at":"2014-07-22T09:56:41.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-07-19T21:24:31.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":52771,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/52771.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Say no to any aid to Syrian Terrorists/Rebels, promote peace","background":null,"additional_details":"Under no circumstances should any aid/assistance be given to the rebels/terrorists in Syria.\r\nCurrently, there is an armed uprising in the country. British principal dictates that we should disarm civilians and assist the Syria Government in so doing in order that a political opposition party if any may be formed and a democratic election held. If terrorists are disarmed then there will be no more people killed and no refugee problem.\r\nCurrently ordinary citizens are being used by terrorists as human shields and although clearly the fault of terrorists the Government are blamed for defending its people from same. Supplying arms or anything to the Terrorists will only serve to cause more deaths and prolong the terrorist struggle to overthrow the government by force. Promote democracy.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-07-16T12:37:22.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:15.940Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-07-17T08:35:00.000Z","closed_at":"2014-07-17T08:35:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-07-16T12:37:22.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":52633,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/52633.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"HMRC to pay Child Benefit to both parents relative to contact","background":null,"additional_details":"Currently, there can only be one recipient parent - even when care & costs are fully shared. Sharing it will...\r\n\r\n1. Enable both parents to spend/save the benefit on/for the child during contact time.\r\n2. Stop the current system whereby only the sole recipient parent is able to make a claim against the other using the CSA no matter what the other's earnings or contact levels. This can lead to a situation where even if contact is 50/50, the recipient parent can make a 'valid' CSA claim against the other who may earn less and receive no child benefit but still has to pay.\r\n\r\nThe system is needlessly & openly unjust, unequal and is being abused by malicious parents. Let's fix it.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-07-11T20:19:15.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:15.496Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-07-22T11:38:19.000Z","closed_at":"2014-07-22T11:38:19.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-07-11T20:19:15.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":52337,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/52337.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Reject proposals for migrant NHS charges","background":null,"additional_details":"On 3rd July 2013, plans were outlined to introduce mandatory charges of a minimum of £200 per annum to access all NHS services, for migrants from outside the European Economic Area who do not have indefinite leave to stay.\r\n\r\nThis would include migrants who have settled in the UK and make contributions to the NHS through taxes and National Insurance - this contribution should make these people fully eligible to receive treatment free at the point of use. The proposals aim to stop \"health tourism\", but will simply penalise legal migrant workers, and spouses of British citizens, whose earnings may not be sufficient to pay for treatment that their NI and income tax contributions should entitle them to.\r\n\r\nThe government should withdraw these plans, and make all those who pay income tax and National Insurance eligible to receive free treatment on the NHS.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-07-03T18:44:05.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:14.481Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-07-04T09:21:39.000Z","closed_at":"2013-10-04T09:21:39.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-07-03T18:44:05.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":72262,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/72262.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"DEMAND A STOP to the MADDNESS outside our SCHOOL","background":null,"additional_details":"This pettition is being made out of pure amazment that people still park oposite school entrances and for a change in the road rules concerning Black Street in the village of Martham.\r\nThese are the changes we need to see for the safety of all our children.\r\n1) People need to stopped from parking opposite both the ENTRANCE AND EXIT to Martham Primary School located  on\r\nBlack St, Martham\r\n2) During school pick up and drop off times Black Street itself needs to be turned into a one way road.\r\n3) Two Zebra crossing need to be placed aswell with one that leads from the churchyard path between white street and black street.\r\nWith the other being placed on the corner between Black street and Staithe Road.\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2014-11-21T10:34:01.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:30:24.058Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2014-11-24T14:08:27.000Z","closed_at":"2015-03-30T22:59:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2014-11-21T10:34:01.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":52062,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/52062.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Make council allow dogs in council flats.","background":null,"additional_details":"I want the government to make a law that councils must allow responsible owners to have a dog in their flat.\r\n\r\nI know that some people are irresponsible but lots of council tenants are not.\r\nIf you have a dog in a flat and you are found out you can be evicted. I say no! This is wrong!\r\nI think if tenants sign a agreement that they would clean up after their dog and make sure it doesn't cause nuisance it should be allowed to live in a flat.\r\nWhere I live there are dogs in flats and there is no mess and you never hear barking or howling.\r\nI think it's time that councils give people a chance.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-06-25T17:54:02.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:13.540Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-06-26T11:11:35.000Z","closed_at":"2014-06-26T11:11:35.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-06-25T17:54:02.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":51960,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/51960.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Alfred the Great For English Patron Saint","background":null,"additional_details":"With a large percentage of the English nation not knowing what date our current national day is, it is time for a change. The greatest Englishman ever (described by Winston Churchill) Saint Alfred the Great is the perfect choice for the replacement and to return pride back to the nation. So let us make October 26th Saint Alfred Day.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-06-22T16:42:29.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:13.241Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-06-24T07:31:04.000Z","closed_at":"2014-06-24T07:31:04.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-06-22T16:42:29.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":52105,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/52105.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"MP's Salary and Allowances Stopped for 7 days a Year","background":null,"additional_details":"In light of the fact that the Treasury Spending Round 2013\r\n\r\n-\"requires all unemployed claimants, and those earning less than the government expects them to, to wait seven days before becoming eligible for financial support\" -\r\n\r\nin order to curb spending we would like\r\n\r\n\"all MPs to lose seven days salary and allowances per annum\"\r\n\r\nas a way to curb spending to demonstrate that \"we're all in it together\"","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-06-26T23:55:15.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:13.677Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-06-28T09:29:19.000Z","closed_at":"2014-06-28T09:29:19.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-06-26T23:55:15.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":51817,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/51817.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Compulsory Food Labelling","background":null,"additional_details":"All food, sweets and drinks, including alcohol, sold in the UK, with no exceptions, should be subject to compulsory food labelling.  This should be clearly shown for the total product weight, and also per 100g,  so that consumers can understand exactly what they are buying.\r\n\r\nThe labelling should contain the following information as a minimum:\r\n\r\nEnergy\r\nProtein\r\nCarbohydrates\r\nSugars\r\nTotal Fat\r\nSaturates\r\nMono Unsaturates\r\nPoly Unsaturates\r\nFibre\r\nSodium\r\nTotal Salt\r\nAdditives\r\nColours\r\nPreservatives\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-06-19T07:18:43.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:12.788Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-06-20T08:56:51.000Z","closed_at":"2014-06-20T08:56:51.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-06-19T07:18:43.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":51797,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/51797.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Loud scooters","background":null,"additional_details":"Put a stop to scooters exhausts being modified so that they make excessive noise.\r\n\r\nThese scooters make so much noise it is hard to hear anything as they ride by and can also damage sensitive hearing. In my home I can not talk on the phone as they the riders pass by, they wake me at night and even drown out the TV and radio. They are louder than most car exhausts and only serve as some sort of 'street cred' between riders.\r\n\r\nI find the noise a constant distraction and annoyance that forces me to close windows on a warm day, this is not fair. ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-06-18T17:09:40.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:12.725Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-06-19T07:57:02.000Z","closed_at":"2014-06-19T07:57:02.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-06-18T17:09:40.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":23370,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/23370.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Make 'Member of Parliament' a voluntary position","background":null,"additional_details":"The government's 'Big Society' calls for more people to volunteer in their communities, and yet the salary of one member of parliament could pay at least six people's wages. What if politician was a voluntary position? I want the government to consider giving up their salaries, not everything else that goes alongside (pensions, reasonable expenses etc). Lets get 100,000 signatures to at least bring this idea into the public forum so it can be realistically considered.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2011-11-20T08:30:12.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:36.932Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-11-21T10:22:33.000Z","closed_at":"2012-11-21T10:22:33.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-11-20T08:30:12.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":51702,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/51702.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"HMRC should have responsible Gov Minister","background":null,"additional_details":"A Government Minister should be made responsible for HMRC. This would mean a new department with perhaps one Minister for personal tax and one for Company tax. This would ensure that the HMRC are answerable to a Minister or Ministers and in turn to the UK Public. At the moment they answer to no-one within Government and can make judgements with no scrutiny. UK Boder Agency has been brought back into Gov why not HMRC.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-06-15T17:18:40.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:12.420Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-06-17T08:51:40.000Z","closed_at":"2013-09-17T08:51:40.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-06-15T17:18:40.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":51742,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/51742.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Warnings on hair dye packaging must be made explicit and printed on the front of boxes","background":null,"additional_details":"European Commission found 36 hair dye chemicals ‘may not be safe for use’\r\n\r\nDyes contain chemicals that can cause serious allergic reactions, which in turn could prove fatal.\r\n\r\nSince 2011, two British women have died in cases linked to the dyes, which are used by millions each year\r\n\r\nSince November 2011, manufacturers have had to place warnings on the side of hair dye packs under European Union regulations.\r\nBut we believe the warnings are not prominent enough.\r\n\r\nThe new warning is on the side. It doesn't hit you in the face like a cigarette warning does.\r\n\r\nWe need to make the warnings explicit. Consumers are not as effectively protected as they should be\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nWe wish for the Government to take action so, that by requirement of law,  hair dye products must print these warnings explicitly on the front of the product box.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-06-17T09:20:48.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:12.552Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-06-17T14:30:50.000Z","closed_at":"2014-06-17T14:30:50.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-06-17T09:20:48.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":51557,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/51557.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"stop the banning of e-cigerettes and vaping products","background":null,"additional_details":"The UK Health regulator is looking to implement a ban on e-cigerettes.\r\n\r\nThe reasoning around this has ranged from unknown health risks through to concerns over children using e-cigerettes as a gateway into smoking.\r\n\r\nI would suggest that these are very separate issues and should be treated as such rather than a blanket ban which would effect a growing part of the UK economy with growth of 30% month on month and also providing a real alternative to smokers who have been unable to quit or who simply do not want to.\r\n\r\nIf there are concerns about the products being marketed to children - impose the same advertising bans that are in place for cigerettes.  Going further, insist that only basic branding can be used or restrict the colour and style to something less appealing to a child (ie not bright pink).\r\n\r\nI believe this ban is more about saving the governments tax revenue which on cigerettes amounts to over £6 per packet of 20 cigerettes!","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-06-12T08:38:48.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:11.934Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-06-12T11:07:31.000Z","closed_at":"2013-09-12T11:07:31.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-06-12T08:38:48.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":50936,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/50936.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Encourage companies or business to turn off their lights at night!","background":null,"additional_details":"In my opinion I consider it a waste when I know that some shops leave their lights on of a night time and even in the day time it happens too. The other day I was in an indoor shopping centre near me and they had lights on which was completely unncessary because it was in the middle of the daytime and already well lit.\r\n\r\nCompanies and businesses should be constantly encouraged to reduce energy use.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-05-28T14:28:30.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:09.746Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-05-29T14:59:02.000Z","closed_at":"2014-05-29T14:59:02.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-05-28T14:28:30.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":23322,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/23322.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Control lawnmower noise.","background":null,"additional_details":"Place a restriction on the maximum decibel level\r\nmade by lawnmowers.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2011-11-19T14:06:21.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:36.783Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-11-22T16:17:43.000Z","closed_at":"2012-11-22T16:17:43.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-11-19T14:06:21.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":23290,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/23290.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Make E-Petition debate votes legally binding if 1m+ signatures","background":null,"additional_details":"If more than 1 million citizens sign an on-line E-Petition on an issue not only should a debate and vote in the House of Commons be held but the Government should then be legal bound to hold a referendum of the entire population on the issue AND to then act in accordance with the outcome of that referendum.\r\nThis would properly reconnect Government with the people and would be true democracy in action because the people would then get what they want. For this reason this petition is unlikely to succeed regardless of the number of signatures it attracts.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2011-11-19T08:17:07.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:36.642Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-11-21T17:49:42.000Z","closed_at":"2012-11-21T17:49:42.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-11-19T08:17:07.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":50627,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/50627.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Posthumously award Drummer Lee Rigby the Victoria Cross","background":null,"additional_details":"Drumer Lee Rigby of the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers was brutally murdered in cold blood in Woolwich on the 22nd May 2013. He faced impossible odds of survival against determined and hysterical fanatics hellbent on carnage and mayhem. He fought their attack alone and unarmed.\r\n\r\nThe Prime Minister called him a \"brave soldier\" and said, \"The people who did this were trying to divide us. They should know something like this will only bring us together and make us stronger. This country will be absolutely resolute in its stand against violent extremism and terror. We will never give in to terror or terrorism in any of its forms.\"\r\n\r\nDrummer Rigby's death should not be in vain. He should be posthumously awarded the Victoria Cross for bravely facing such a brutal and fatal attack alone and unarmed. Such an award would be symbolic of his bravery against the odds and Britain's resolve against terrorism, which will never be broken.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-05-23T20:03:19.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:08.745Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-06-17T08:33:29.000Z","closed_at":"2014-06-17T08:33:29.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-05-23T20:03:19.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":23272,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/23272.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"RETENTION OF SCHOOL UNIFORM CLOTHING GRANTS","background":null,"additional_details":"That Government calls on Local Authorities who currently provide school uniform clothing grants to retain these grants for the poorest children within their communities.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2011-11-18T22:03:43.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:36.576Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-11-29T12:46:14.000Z","closed_at":"2012-11-29T12:46:14.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-11-18T22:03:43.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":50326,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/50326.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Ban the keeping of chickens in built-up areas","background":null,"additional_details":"The keeping of chickens in private gardens in built-up areas should be banned.  They create a noise nuisance, attract pests including rats, flies and foxes and they often smell.  This affects neigbouring properties that are in very close proximity.\r\n\r\nFoxes that are attracted by chickens also pose a threat to pets like rabbits and guinea pigs and create problems for people who have dogs and cats in their gardens.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-05-21T10:31:59.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:07.719Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-05-22T09:54:12.000Z","closed_at":"2014-05-22T09:54:12.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-05-21T10:31:59.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":50339,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/50339.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Call time on welfare state","background":null,"additional_details":"1. All benefits to be paid in voucher form and only used in conjunction with valid ID. Not for purchase of cigarettes, alcohol, new clothes or pet supplies.\r\n\r\n2. Long term (greater than 6 months) housing benefits claimants to be housed in local authority run housing dorms. Curfews applied and food and 2nd hand clothing supplied.\r\n\r\n3. Anyone on long term benefits will waive the right to those benefits should they have children.\r\n\r\n4. No free services or benefits for more than 2 children per household.\r\n\r\n5. Claimants given work placements, if not attended, benefits cease.\r\n\r\n6. Regular drug tests for all claimants.\r\n\r\n7. Passports surrendered for all claimants.\r\n\r\n8. Taxpayers to be put ahead of benefits claimants on NHS waiting lists.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-05-21T14:12:45.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:07.761Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-05-21T15:37:02.000Z","closed_at":"2014-05-21T15:37:02.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-05-21T14:12:45.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":23245,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/23245.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop funding Public Sector Pensions","background":null,"additional_details":"That public sector pensions be funded wholley by public sector workers in line with private sector  and the self employed who have to pay for their own pensions, stop the private sector having to fund public sector gold plated pensions, the only exception being our Armed Forces.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2011-11-18T18:01:16.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:36.482Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-11-22T09:40:04.000Z","closed_at":"2012-05-22T08:40:04.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-11-18T18:01:16.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":49838,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/49838.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"substantial increase in Road Fund Tax for 4x4 vehicles","background":null,"additional_details":"As these vehicles without any doubt cause more damage to our roads and surrounding verges than car classification vehicles, should they not have their Road Tax substantially increased? The governement are seeking ways to find funding for more esential services such as The NHS, Police, Education, etc. These totaly unneccessary monsters are by far under taxed in relation to the damage they cause, the amount of fuel they burn ( makers fuel consumption figures are NOT rated for urban use ) the damage they can and do cause  even low speed collisions (due to their gross weight and bump zone area )  is massive especially on the human body. The governement should seriously consider a Road Tax sliding scale of at least £1200, for the smaller classes and up to at least £3,500 per annnum for the largest BMW, Range Rover, Volvo, and Ford type gas gusslers, they shouls also be banned by weght classificattion form minor roads especially near schools and high density public areas.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2013-05-10T09:00:43.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:29:06.147Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2013-05-14T08:39:17.000Z","closed_at":"2014-05-14T08:39:17.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2013-05-10T09:00:43.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":23237,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/23237.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Letting grave yards remain undisturbed, so that people may rest in peace.","background":null,"additional_details":"To preserve the right for people's remains to be undisturbed after they have passed on.\r\n After people have paid for a plot of land that they wish to be buried in, they have the right, even after death, to remain in that piece of land.\r\n That the piece of land aquired by the desceased, should not be then sold on, after any period of time, to developers or third parties, for future development, as in the case of the nuovo cemetry in mile end road, London.\r\nThat Planning departments, do not have the right to reallocate conscecrated land, without proper and appropriate impartial advice and approval.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2011-11-18T16:58:46.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:36.450Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-12-01T11:07:45.000Z","closed_at":"2012-12-01T11:07:45.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-11-18T16:58:46.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":35105,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/35105.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Issue of food stamps and vouchers for childrens clothing instead of cash to those on benefits","background":null,"additional_details":"This will encourage people to seek work as they won't be able to purchase luxury items on benefit cash any longer.  It will also have a dramatic effect on fraudulent benefit claims.  The state should do no more than feed people and clothe their children, not pay for alcohol, tobacco, gambling and package holidays.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":5,"created_at":"2012-06-19T12:51:26.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:13.783Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-06-20T11:28:49.000Z","closed_at":"2013-06-20T11:28:49.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-06-19T12:51:26.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}}]}