{"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=434&parliament=2&state=all","first":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?state=all","last":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=1219&state=all","next":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=435&state=all","prev":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions.json?page=433&state=all"},"data":[{"type":"archived-petition","id":28691,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/28691.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Compulsory Reduced Systems for Supermarkets to Save Food","background":null,"additional_details":"Introduce legally enforceable compulsory systems that progressively reduces the price of food reaching its sell by date in  supermarkets in line with trading hours. This would ensure that all food items automatically receive rebate incentives to increase stock rotation of perishable consumables.\r\nCurrent voluntary labelling systems are proving timely, costly and inefficient. Although the technology to reduce perishable items at the 'point of sale' has been available since bar-codes were introduced. Some reduced items and reduced sections have also been shown to have negative social connotations causing some food to be wasted.\r\nAt present few supermarkets effectively use this system which has the potential to save time, money and food compared to other food reducing systems; ultimately enforcing efficient, ethical and sustainable consumption.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-01-30T20:16:40.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:53.169Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-01-31T15:53:52.000Z","closed_at":"2013-01-31T15:53:52.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-30T20:16:40.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":28645,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/28645.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop Rupert Murdoch's BBC robbery","background":null,"additional_details":"The BBC is being forced to hand over tens of millions of pounds every year to line Rupert Murdoch's pockets. Murdoch's cronies in government are determined to save this scheme -- but together we can stop this outrage. These unbelievable regulations cost our public broadcasters up to £100 million a year. Rather than being paid for their valuable content, they actually have to pay BSkyB to show their programmes even though they add huge value to the satellite platform -- accounting for 41% of all shows watched on BSkyB and vastly increasing customer retention. In the coming days, Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt will decide whether to renew this dreadful deal - I urge you to sign this petition to ask him to end the unfair rules that force the BBC to hand over tens of million of pounds every year to Rupert Murdoch’s BSkyB. These fees don't exist in other Western countries.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-01-30T09:30:26.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:53.026Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-29T15:12:27.000Z","closed_at":"2012-05-29T14:12:27.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-30T09:30:26.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":28739,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/28739.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Realistic airsoft guns for 16's and 17's.","background":null,"additional_details":"With members of the UKARA having to be over 18, and the legal age for anyone to play airsoft is 16+ it is highly unfair that school/college students in the UK should have to pay an extra £200-£300 for a realistic airsoft gun when they are 18 instead of the two tones currently available.\r\n\r\nI suggest that ages 16 and 17 should be able to join the UKARA, but they will require a parents signature, and have to play 4 times in over 2 months (Instead of 3 in over 2 months.) This should then grant them use of an airsoft gun. The parent guardian would have to purchase said gun, but the under 18's UKARA license  can be used to purchase realistic airsoft rifles.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-01-31T17:22:02.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:53.319Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-01T16:00:49.000Z","closed_at":"2012-11-01T16:00:49.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-31T17:22:02.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":28742,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/28742.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Trains should have adequate seating for 2nd class passengers","background":null,"additional_details":"Train companies appear to have freedom to dictate the amount of carriages a train has. I propose that the train companies should be obliged to provide adequate seating for the average number of 2nd class passengers on any given route. E.g. if enough 2nd class passengers take the 16:45 train from London Cannon street to Ramsgate to fill 10 cars, then SouthEastern Trains should be forced to provide 10 cars on that service at that time.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-01-31T18:15:36.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:53.330Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-01T09:48:29.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-01T09:48:29.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-01-31T18:15:36.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":28801,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/28801.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Bonus in public sector","background":null,"additional_details":"No person employed in the public sector should be paid a bonus on the basis that the general public expect all public employees to do their best to achieve what they are paid to do. Should they fall short of the expectation of the job their salary should be reduced.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-01T16:19:47.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:53.559Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-06T09:09:38.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-06T09:09:38.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-01T16:19:47.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30188,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30188.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Increase the school day by 1 hour","background":null,"additional_details":"By increasing the school hours from 9-3 on Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday to 9-4 Wednesday could be a free day and no work would be missed.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-22T20:49:09.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:57.931Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-23T10:22:08.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-23T10:22:08.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-22T20:49:09.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":28985,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/28985.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Do not downgrade the Engineering diploma at GCSE","background":null,"additional_details":"This send out the wrong signals to both foreign business who are looking for places to invest and home businesses.\r\nAre we serious about increasing the interest in engineering in the UK?\r\nThose who take this diploma may take engineering at college and university.\r\nAs well as Science and Maths, the country needs more engineers and techology students.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-04T13:17:40.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:54.205Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-06T14:00:45.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-06T14:00:45.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-04T13:17:40.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":29025,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/29025.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"The amount of signatures needed for a petition to pass should be lowered.","background":null,"additional_details":"100,000 is way too high. Do 100,000 people go on this website, and check through each new petition every day? I doubt it. This petition asks for the amount to be lowered to a more reasonable amount, like 10,000.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-05T12:24:48.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:54.317Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-06T09:34:55.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-06T09:34:55.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-05T12:24:48.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":29159,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/29159.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Raise the Personal Allowances to £12,000 for a single person, 15,000 for a single parent and £18,000 for couples with children","background":null,"additional_details":"The personal allowances are far too low and have not kept pace with inflation for many years.  They need to be substantially raised to make it worthwhle working. The budegt is due in April and we want the personal allowances raised at that time. If not this year, then next. The bottom 10% of tax payers raise less than £1 billion pounds of tax anyway. If Government revenues are reduced by this measure, we accept that it may need to make cuts elsewhere. ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-07T11:38:07.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:54.677Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-08T08:52:49.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-08T08:52:49.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-07T11:38:07.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":29230,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/29230.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Allow citizens access to Downing Street.","background":null,"additional_details":"Since the late 1980's a set of gates has barred public access to Downing Street. Since then a fundamental disconnect has built up between the public and the government. The gates across Downing Street are a symbol of this political malaise. We the signatories to this petition ask Her Majesty's Government to provide a form of limited access to Downing Street. The access should be subject to security checks, ticketing and be strictly time limited and only available during the summer parliamentary recess. A similar system currently works well for visits to Parliament.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-07T22:34:09.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:54.883Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-08T09:20:48.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-08T09:20:48.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-07T22:34:09.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":29249,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/29249.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Private vs Public use of NHSBT Donated Blood","background":null,"additional_details":"We agree that:\r\n\r\nIn the UK Blood is donated as an act of charity by individuals.\r\n\r\nDonated blood should be made available to different organisations at different costs.\r\n\r\nPrivate hospitals charge very large amounts for blood transfusions during operations, amounts far in excess of the basic costs for the blood itself.\r\n\r\nPrivate hospitals should pay the maximum the market can afford as they are profit making organisations whilst NHS hospitals should continue to receive blood at low cost.\r\n\r\nThe profit generated from this approach should be used to provide further funding to the wider NHS.\r\n\r\nThank you.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-08T09:27:13.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:54.932Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-09T08:12:05.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-09T08:12:05.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-08T09:27:13.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":29296,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/29296.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Between the highest and lowest wages in an enterprise (public or privte) a maximum span of 1:12 is to be specified.","background":null,"additional_details":"The wage and bonus excesses in the executive floors of private and public enterprises cannot be allowed and accepted anymore. We have to counteract this trend of the wage gap between lowest and highest incomes becoming ever bigger. Bonuses over £ 50,000.00 need to be subject to a special tax.\r\n\r\nThe governement needs to ensure, that no wages - including boni - of top executives exceed 12 times the lowest wage in any enterprise.\r\n\r\nA progressive tax system for any boni exceeding £ 50,000.00 needs to be introduced.\r\n\r\nBonuses need to be linked to sustainable growth. No boni to be paid, if an enterprise has not grown. The increase in boni payment is to be restricted to the increase in effective, bottom line growth or growth in shareholder payment. Furthermore boni need to be in relation to bottom line profit growth, not to turnover growth.\r\n\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-08T20:50:58.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:55.143Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-09T09:18:33.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-09T09:18:33.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-08T20:50:58.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":29319,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/29319.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop the Government destroying the UK solar industry with its revised FIT cuts.","background":null,"additional_details":"The government has once again announced its plans to reform the feed-in tariff incentives scheme for solar PV installations in the UK.\r\n\r\nMinisters have set out proposals that could see incentives for solar PV installations with less than 4kW of capacity cut by 35% to 13.6p/kWh. At this level a significant contraction is imminent and will ultimately squash what was once a huge growth sector.\r\n\r\nThe new proposals will be open for consultation until April 3, the government is proposing cuts to incentives for standard installations depending on the rate of installation between now and then.\r\n\r\nThis is once again an unacceptable compromise from the UK government that will see 1,000's of jobs vast numbers of SME's disappearing.\r\n\r\nThis must not be allowed to happen.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-09T13:02:52.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:55.221Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-10T09:46:21.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-10T09:46:21.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-09T13:02:52.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":29357,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/29357.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Bring back 100 Watt lightbulbs","background":null,"additional_details":"Please bring back 100 Watt light bulbs.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-09T19:32:02.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:55.338Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-13T12:27:14.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-13T12:27:14.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-09T19:32:02.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":29375,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/29375.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop Housing associations and local authorites using ground 8 for possession.","background":null,"additional_details":"End housing associations use of Ground 8 when seeking possession for rent arrears\r\nSome housing associations are continuing to choose to seek possession for rent arrears using the mandatory Ground 8 under the 1988 Housing Act. This prevents judges from using their discretionary powers to take into account any mitigating factors such as outstanding housing benefit problems.  It also prevents advisers from negotiating alternative solutions which might avoid outright possession, homelessness and unnecessary hardship for vulnerable people.\r\nCase Law Court of Appeal ruling (North British Housing Association v Matthews (2004) EWCA Civ1736) has demonstrated that housing associations do not necessarily have measures in place to ensure Ground 8 is only used as a\r\nlast resort as required by the Housing Corporation.\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-09T23:52:30.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:55.386Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-13T11:51:18.000Z","closed_at":"2012-08-13T10:51:18.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-09T23:52:30.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":29591,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/29591.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Reform to penalty fare process (Transport)","background":null,"additional_details":"The current system of Penalty Fares is the reverse of the normal \"innocent until proved guilty\" British justice system. This leads the way for the Train companies to entrap commuters into paying penalty fare where they are not guilty (eg faulty ticket barriers or incompetant staff). The Penalty Fare scheme should follow the traditional \"innocent until proven guilty\" mantra and this is what I propose. Even a £20 penalty fare, when incorrectly issued, can be unaffordable for some and is entirely inappropriate.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-13T16:43:31.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:56.009Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-15T09:13:24.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-15T09:13:24.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-13T16:43:31.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":29656,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/29656.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"organ retention card","background":null,"additional_details":"I wish to have my care and welfare as a priority no matter how close to death I may be. I wish to have such a card exist so that my wishes are known even if i were comatose so that no one thinks of me as a potential organ bank","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-14T13:52:15.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:56.210Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-16T08:57:52.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-16T08:57:52.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-14T13:52:15.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":29743,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/29743.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop Marches Supporting Terrorisim","background":null,"additional_details":"The aim of the petition is to stop marches in the UK that show open support to terrorism. Also marches that incite religious, cultural and sectarian hatred.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-15T15:39:53.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:56.468Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-22T13:58:53.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-22T13:58:53.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-15T15:39:53.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":29672,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/29672.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Demolish the rule that suggests that homeless people aren’t entitled to JCP because they don’t have an address.","background":null,"additional_details":"There are many unemployed people in Britain and this is leading to homelessness. The rule at the moment is to sign onto JSA, the person needs an address so that letters can go to the address given and you need to have a bank account for money to enter to the account holder. This is clearly unjust and immoral. This rule doesn’t look at different perspectives. The anecdote may be that a person who was well off got their own accommodation and a highly paid job, due to the recession became redundant and lost accommodation. Why shouldn’t they be entitled job seekers? Why does the rule undermine ones misfortune? I propose that this rule should no longer exist as it makes it harder for homeless people to get employed. Demolish the rule that suggests that homeless people aren’t entitled to JCP because they don’t have an address. ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-14T16:49:26.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:56.260Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-15T17:15:58.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-15T17:15:58.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-14T16:49:26.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":29714,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/29714.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Keep the NHS Bill","background":null,"additional_details":"Many of us live in areas of the country with poor performing hospitals, high mortality rates and poor aftercare.  The Bill will increase competition (this exists and was introduced by the last government) and all research indicates that this will improve our mortality rates which according to international comparisons is dreadful.  Removing tiers of administration will redirect funds to frontline services.  Further, local commissioning of services will be bettter as to will legislation to ensure Patients have a say.\r\n\r\nThe government should resist attempts to derail the Bill by those who seek to make political capital or the vested interests of those employed by the NHS and their unions.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-15T10:44:52.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:56.399Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-16T09:01:59.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-16T09:01:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-15T10:44:52.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":29730,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/29730.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"BAN LOGBOOK LOANS","background":null,"additional_details":"THESE TYPE OF LOANS NEED TO BE BANNED.\r\nTHEY ARE LOANS HELD AGAINST YOUR VEHICLE WITH VERY HIGH INTEREST AND THE LOAN COMPANIES PREY ON THE PEOPLE WHO CANT GET CREDIT ANYWHERE ELSE.\r\nLETS GET THEM BANNED FOR GOOD","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-15T13:51:00.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:56.437Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-16T10:12:16.000Z","closed_at":"2012-08-16T09:12:16.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-15T13:51:00.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":29787,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/29787.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Student loans for non-university HE courses","background":null,"additional_details":"Open up Student Loans to professional HE courses.\r\nFrom 2012 HEFCE funding has stopped on HE (Level 4 and above) professional courses studied at colleges. This has the potential of doubling the fees for students.\r\nEmployers value this courses and many will pay the fees for their employees but some may not be able to do so. People who wish to change their career will obviously not get the fees paid.\r\nThe courses are at the same academic level (and pass marks are at 50% instead of 40%) as university qualifications but only university students are elegible for Student Loans. This is unfair and will, ultimately. affect the competiveness of the UK.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-16T06:57:13.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:56.601Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-16T09:16:21.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-16T09:16:21.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-16T06:57:13.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":22381,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/22381.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Liars Loans Fraud and Complicity","background":null,"additional_details":"Why does this Gov't, the FSA, the BOE and Banks ignore the Liars Loans fraud, the largest financial fraud in UK history? Conservative estimate is 70 Billion pounds worth of fraud.\r\n\r\nThey appear complicit in helping fraudsters benefit from low interest rates whilst screwing the much larger group of Savers who outnumber borrowers 6-1.\r\n\r\nCoalition has reneged on it's election promise to help Savers.\r\n\r\nThe FSA, BOE and Gov't have already been informed of these issues on numerous occasions.\r\n\r\nThe Gov't must investigate this fraud, and punish those lenders, their agents and the applicants and return applicants' saved interest to Savers.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2011-11-11T10:07:17.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:33.557Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-11-14T08:14:44.000Z","closed_at":"2012-11-14T08:14:44.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-11-11T10:07:17.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":29966,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/29966.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Christianity","background":null,"additional_details":"Petition for the government to recognise the United Kingdom as a christian country. The majority people who have lived in the United Kingdom to the present day have been Christian since the 3rd centuary.\r\n\r\nThe government should also consider banning non christian religions as they are ending our nationality and heritage.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-19T19:35:14.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:57.200Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-23T14:29:19.000Z","closed_at":"2012-11-23T14:29:19.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-19T19:35:14.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30027,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30027.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Surrey Bus Services within M25","background":null,"additional_details":"All Surrey bus services within the M25 should be transfered to TFL ownership. Currently the Surrey bus services within the M25 are not subsidised, and are expensive / infrequent.\r\n\r\nCurrently there are many bus routes run by TFL that go far beyond the M25 boundary (81 to Slough, and 465 to Dorking being just two). This means people in places such as Walton, Weybridge and Chertsey are are at a disadvantage, because of having to pay far more to use the bus services - hence they are not being used. Increased public transport usage is surely a priority for the government - and this would be a good starting point for thousands of people in and around the surrey M25 boundary.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-20T16:17:41.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:57.382Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-21T09:37:35.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-21T09:37:35.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-20T16:17:41.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30061,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30061.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Prevent Learner Drivers from using motorways","background":null,"additional_details":"Roads Minister Mike Penning intends to change the current laws governing learner drivers to allow them to use the UK's motorways before they have passed their test.\r\n\r\nThe UK's motorways are already congested and dangerous enough without the additional high risks that large numbers of inexperienced drivers would bring.\r\n\r\nThis petition calls on the Government to reject this patently risky idea and prevent the minister from misusing delegated legislation to force through laws that affect and potentially may harm existing drivers without full debate in the House of Commons.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-21T00:10:09.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:57.490Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-21T09:37:09.000Z","closed_at":"2012-05-21T08:37:09.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-21T00:10:09.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":31094,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/31094.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Overseas recruitment for UK jobs should be banned","background":null,"additional_details":"Overseas recruitment for existing UK job vacancies should be banned, unless the prospective employer can clearly demonstrate that the position cannot be filled by a UK national, even if such an individual requires a short period of trainig (6 weeks or less).","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-03-08T20:31:45.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:00.930Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-03-09T08:50:03.000Z","closed_at":"2013-03-09T08:50:03.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-03-08T20:31:45.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30178,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30178.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"to force ALL builders to be fully qualified BEFORE they are allowed to start building works","background":null,"additional_details":"to STOP anyone to do ANY building work with out checks and  to have to get a qualification and a PERMIT from their local authority after they have done all checks ie check to see if they have done apprenticeships  and had completed a city and guilds course or NVQ & to make sure they have adequate  buildings insurance & to make checks on ALL of their building work while they hold the permit & to have to renew permits every five years & if there is more than five complaints with trading standards and ANY court orders by customers the permit can be revoked .This should cut down on the cowboy builders and any DIY person thinking they can blagg their way into running their own building company .IF you had an operation you take it for granted their qualified  so what difference is there when you instruct a builder you just assume they are qualified THIS IS NOT THE CASE WE HAVE TO STOP COWBOY BUILDERS  MAKING HOME OWNERS IN DANGER SO PLEASE SIGN THIS AS THIS HAS TO STOP ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-22T20:01:17.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:57.895Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-27T10:19:59.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-27T10:19:59.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-22T20:01:17.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30169,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30169.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Youth representative in the police force","background":null,"additional_details":"We want a youth representative in the police force to give advice and be consulted on issues which affect the youth. We want it to be made compulsory for every police force to have a youth commissioner under 18 who is to be consulted on decisions made that affect the youth. ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-22T18:49:26.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:57.872Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-29T13:54:10.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-28T13:54:10.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-22T18:49:26.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30237,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30237.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Change the law on protective award compensation and redundencies in enviroments with less than 20 employed","background":null,"additional_details":"Currently the law states that employers in the UK do not have to consultate with either employees and/or trade unions for making redundencies in \"working enviroments\" employing less than 20 people. We want to change this law after several tribunals have denied protective award compensation for people in these situations including Woolworths and Ethel Austins. There are many more instances like these and we feel this law needs changing. Sign and help us make a difference today.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-23T15:13:15.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:58.069Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-24T08:59:14.000Z","closed_at":"2012-08-24T07:59:14.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-23T15:13:15.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30310,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30310.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"unlicenced drivers and joy riders","background":null,"additional_details":"i would like to petition for a change in the law regarding unlicenced drivers,joy riders under aged drivers in fact any person caught driving a vehicle whilst being unlicenced.I would like to see an end to drivers on our roads who should not be there,and if they persist with this behaviour they should be refused a licence for life,on the grounds that they are not a fit and proper person to hold a licence,one strike and your out. I feel that this would eventually rid our roads of thoroughly bad,problem drivers.In turn when these persistant offenders realise they will not ever hold a driving licence they will have to think very hard about their future as when they get older they will not be able to take their famillies out for day trips or holidays,this will also help with our public transport thus giving more employment","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-24T17:28:29.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:58.318Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-27T10:03:18.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-27T10:03:18.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-24T17:28:29.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30233,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30233.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"disabled young adults to be given more dignity by being issued with incontinence pants not nappies","background":null,"additional_details":"disabled young adults and adults are not given the right to be issued with pull up incontinence pants - they have to wear nappies which is totally undignified the reason for this is cost - i believe everyone is entitled to be treated with dignity and nappies for disabled people is against their human rights.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-23T14:27:58.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:58.053Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-03-05T15:13:06.000Z","closed_at":"2013-03-05T15:13:06.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-23T14:27:58.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30274,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30274.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Stop placing important government contracts with overseas organisations","background":null,"additional_details":"It is time that the Government supported the remaining industries that we have in the UK by ensuring that where feasibly (i.e not in conflict with International Competition Law) possible, we focus our spending on military and major asset procurement towards UK based, UK registered and more importantly UK owned businesses.\r\nWe are seeing a rapid increase in the degeneration of skills in within Engineering and Technology which could be underpinned by sensible government spending.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-24T12:23:24.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:58.194Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-27T10:25:11.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-27T10:25:11.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-24T12:23:24.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30371,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30371.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"To prevent the wining and dining of civil servants","background":null,"additional_details":"To make it illegal for any organisation to wine and dine any government department or civil servant,  encouraging better decision making when considering proposals to government tenders.\r\n\r\nSo much money is wasted by bad decision-making particularly on IT projects, MOD contracts.\r\n\r\nA first step in UK subjects demanding efficiency improvements and making departments financially responsible for their losses.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-25T20:49:47.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:58.515Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-27T10:26:54.000Z","closed_at":"2013-02-27T10:26:54.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-25T20:49:47.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30362,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30362.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"COMMEMORATE MEMORY OF POLISH GENERALS SERVED IN POLISH ARMED FORCES UNDER BRITISH COMMAND","background":null,"additional_details":"Please commemorate memory Polish generals as Sosnkowski Maczek Sosabowski Rudnicki Sulik Kopanski by local councils in London by giving them name of streets and blue plaque as they served during WWII under British command In my opinion this is apropriate way to appreciate theirs fight  After war they have been abandoned forgotten by British and end as a common people or workers Some of them was blamed unjustified by faults of British command like gen Sosabowski in operation Market Garden some like gen Sosnkowski was discriminate for own views by British authority This must be revised and they must be at last theirs names clear All of them was good brave people loyal Allies Please remember not only Polish airman who saved UK but also this soldiers and theirs generals who fought on field and sea They fought just remind you in Monte Cassino like my ancestor  Tobruk Narvik Falaise Normandy Please remember them also","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-25T15:34:54.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:58.487Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-03-12T08:48:21.000Z","closed_at":"2013-03-12T08:48:21.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-25T15:34:54.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30491,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30491.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Sociology should be included in the list of ebacc subjects","background":null,"additional_details":"Sociology should be included in the list of subjects counted towards the 'ebacc' qualification. It is a very useful subject and teaches you about British society","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-28T14:13:11.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:58.891Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-03-01T14:28:08.000Z","closed_at":"2013-03-01T14:28:08.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-28T14:13:11.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30488,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30488.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Reduce fuel duty and stop choking the economy","background":null,"additional_details":"As the price of fuel continues to rise the Government solution is to continue to increase the rate of duty, a rate which is already beyond an acceptable level. While fuel prices and duty continue to rise people are inclined to make less journeys so the amount of revenue generated, albeit at a higher rate, must be in decline. The rate of duty must be reduced in line with European rates before the transport sector grinds to a halt.\r\nNo transport = no economy = european bailout.\r\nIt is not a sufficient government response to the debate to say they should have charged more duty already, fuel duty is not a bailout fund for the UK. ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-28T13:48:21.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:58.884Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-02-29T09:00:40.000Z","closed_at":"2012-05-29T08:00:40.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-28T13:48:21.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30471,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30471.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"To create a new Chartered Teacher title with the appropriate oversite body","background":null,"additional_details":"Call on the relevant minister of state to introduce legislation to create an oversight body on existing, new and student teaching practice and standards. This proposed chartered body should have the same ideals as any other chartered body: Solicitors Regulation Authority; The Institution of Engineering and Technology etc.; the same responsibilities concerning its profession in providing a check and balance on failing teachers, and the powers to bring disciplinary sanctions, if required; with the Privy Council being its last court of appeal.      ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-02-28T08:22:42.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:58.825Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-03-01T12:50:17.000Z","closed_at":"2013-03-01T12:50:17.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-02-28T08:22:42.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30610,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30610.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Protection for home educated children","background":null,"additional_details":"Parents currently have the right to deregister their children from school to home educate them. While many parents are responsible and provide an education, the local authority is currently powerless to ensure the child is receiving a suitable education that prepares them for society and suits their needs. This loophole in child protection, ignores the rights of the child to be educated; it cannot be assumed that everyone that deregisters their child has the skill, desire or motivation to provide a suitable education for their child. This petition is for a reform in the legislation on elective home education, to make it compulsory for the child to be registered as being home educated and to be regularly visited by the local authority to ensure the child is receiving an education and their needs are not being neglected.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-03-01T11:42:50.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:59.254Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-03-01T14:24:31.000Z","closed_at":"2013-03-01T14:24:31.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-03-01T11:42:50.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30618,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30618.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Gender equality by statute for the U.K parliament","background":null,"additional_details":"Gender equality by statute for the U.K parliament\r\nFor the national parliament as the instrument of our language, to be truly democratic and to represent the universality then it should reflect the experience of all of us. What is the objective of all women short lists ultimately if not to achieve this and when?\r\n\r\nThis petition proposes to;\r\n\r\nProvide gender equality in government by pairing each seat and prevent funding of political parties from sources other than the treasury.\r\n\r\nThe aim is to elevate parliament to the position of primacy and to end political apathy in the U.K and provide the institution of complete credibility for generations to come.\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-03-01T13:53:13.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:59.282Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-03-02T11:54:25.000Z","closed_at":"2013-03-02T11:54:25.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-03-01T13:53:13.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30682,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30682.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"To allow money deposited in a Curent Year's Cash ISA to be withdrawn and replaced during that year.","background":null,"additional_details":"To allow money deposited in a Current Year's Cash ISA to be withdrawn and replaced during that year This will encourage saving and avoid, during just the first year, the frustration of not being able to take advantage of the full Cash ISA Allowance in that first year.\r\nThe current rule just frustrates the Saver when he has an emergency and has to temporarily use his savings.\r\nIt appears quite an unnecessary rule and discriminates against persons who need to draw on their savings for a short period. The rule can still remain for the following years when it has a real meaningful purpose.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-03-02T14:41:12.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:59.483Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-03-05T07:51:24.000Z","closed_at":"2013-03-05T07:51:24.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-03-02T14:41:12.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30700,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30700.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Driving re-assessment test","background":null,"additional_details":"I would like to see all category A and B riders/drivers re-assessed every 7-10 years. This will be a 30 minute assessment on driving skills and attitude. Should the candidate fall below the required level, they will be invited to attend a training course before attempting the re-assessment again.\r\nIt will save lives, reduce accidents, reduce insurance premiums, create revenue and create jobs.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-03-02T20:18:21.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:59.548Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-03-05T08:51:18.000Z","closed_at":"2013-03-05T08:51:18.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-03-02T20:18:21.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30708,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30708.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"stop any involvement with argentina","background":null,"additional_details":"stop any trade & financial help with Argentina until they realize that the Falkland Islands are not theirs","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-03-02T22:36:31.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:59.576Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-03-05T09:46:22.000Z","closed_at":"2013-03-05T09:46:22.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-03-02T22:36:31.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":13587,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/13587.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Over Priced Housing","background":null,"additional_details":"Over the last 15 years we have stood back and watch the housing market get out of hand and the government as done nothing to stop it.\r\nThis is part of the cause of the economic state we are in.\r\nHouse prices are 60% over valued.\r\nBring in laws to stop estate agents over valuing properties..","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2011-08-18T20:19:02.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:04.171Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2011-12-16T09:01:30.000Z","closed_at":"2012-12-16T09:01:30.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2011-08-18T20:19:02.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30779,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30779.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Commemorate Memory of Polish generals served in Polish Armed Forces under British command in WWII","background":null,"additional_details":"Please give a names of streets and blue plaque in London particulary Polish generals as follows Anders  Sosabowski Sosnkowski Maczek Kopanski Sulik  After the war they cannot came back to Poland they  have been abandoned and forgotten by British Allie  some of them worked as a common workers Sosabowski for example in Acton  Maczek in Scotland Please give them this honour because they earned it   Please not only remember about Polish fighter pilots but also these who fought on field and sea in Polish Armed Forces under British command Please remember them today ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-03-04T13:11:27.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:59.823Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-04-13T08:24:57.000Z","closed_at":"2013-04-13T08:24:57.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-03-04T13:11:27.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30773,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30773.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Ban cookery on TV and bring back gardening","background":null,"additional_details":"We are looking at an obesety epidemic and are told we should take more excersize. So why are we encouraged to eat rather than excersize by TV programs.\r\n\r\nTV programs influence the actions of people greater than you may think. When programs like \"ground force\" were on the air, many people used to go into thier gardens and create. Now, when we are subjected to many hours of cooking programs, people just eat instead.\r\n\r\nThe deparment of health should put pressure on the TV companies to produce programs that show healthy things as fun and how anyone can get involved. Gardening is considered a mild excercise and benificial to health, unlike preparing and stuffing yourself with rich foods.\r\n\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-03-04T10:50:01.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:59.807Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-03-23T14:12:14.000Z","closed_at":"2013-03-23T14:12:14.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-03-04T10:50:01.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30827,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30827.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Allow infants to the olympics without the need for a 'seated' ticket","background":null,"additional_details":"Currently infants require a ticket to view olympic events. In many cases the infant was conceived after the olympic tickets went on sale so it was not possible to account for when originally ordering tickets.\r\n\r\nThis petition is for infants under the age of 1 to be allowed into events without the need to purchase a 'seated' ticket.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-03-05T13:24:35.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:27:59.975Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-03-26T14:46:32.000Z","closed_at":"2012-06-26T14:46:32.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-03-05T13:24:35.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30899,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30899.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"jobs","background":null,"additional_details":"remove back to work companies such as A4e and serco,the money used for these agencies should be used to create proper jobs. They are pointless and do not work.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-03-06T15:30:02.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:00.262Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-03-06T15:49:17.000Z","closed_at":"2013-03-06T15:49:17.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-03-06T15:30:02.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":30985,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/30985.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"RE shouldn't be compulsory.","background":null,"additional_details":"This is for my Citizenship GCSE and i think RE shouldn't be forced on kids that doesn't believe in any of that stuff.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-03-07T11:30:22.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:00.535Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-03-14T14:42:44.000Z","closed_at":"2013-03-14T14:42:44.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-03-07T11:30:22.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":31053,"links":{"self":"https://preview.epetitions.website/archived/petitions/31053.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2010-2015","government":"Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition","dissolution_at":"2015-03-30T23:59:59.000+01:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Introduce recycling bins into Oakham","background":null,"additional_details":"We would like to introduce a range of recycling bins into Oakham town centre. This would make Oakham a greener, more plesant place. We could set a trend for other small towns. The only problem with this is the cost of the project - but I feel that ultimately we gain enough for this not to be a problem. ","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":4,"created_at":"2012-03-08T09:32:55.000Z","updated_at":"2020-02-16T19:28:00.785Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2012-03-22T15:16:18.000Z","closed_at":"2013-03-22T15:16:18.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2012-03-08T09:32:55.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}}]}