This petition was submitted during the 2010-2015 parliament
Rejected petition Human Rights Act 1998 & the judiciary
More details
Pending a sensible resolution of the Human Rights Act 1998, e.g. by repealing the Act, by withdrawing from the European Union, by withdrawing from the Council of Europe or all three, require the judiciary to act on the law AS WRITTEN.
Thus, Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights as embodied in HRA 1998 Schedule 1 provides a right to respect for private and family life. It does not provide a right to a private and family life. If it is interpreted in the latter manner, I demand that HM Government provide me with a family.
All legal cases since inception of the Act to be reviewed to determine whether the law was correctly applied and all judgements to be revised accordingly. All judgements involving financial penalties, compensation, costs etc. to be revised to reflect the proper outcome. Where the Article was used to avoid deportation, the deportation should take place.
This petition was rejected
Why was this petition rejected?
There’s already a petition about this issue. We cannot accept a new petition when we already have one about a very similar issue.
You are more likely to get action on this issue if you sign and share a single petition.
We only reject petitions that don’t meet the petition standards.